1. Examination of sources of diagnostic error leading to cervical cone biopsies with no evidence of dysplasia.
- Author
-
Carrigg A, Teschendorf C, Amaro D, Weidner N, Tipps A, Shabaik A, Peterson MR, Lin GY, and Hasteh F
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biomarkers, Tumor analysis, Biopsy, Conization, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16 biosynthesis, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Precancerous Conditions metabolism, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms metabolism, Young Adult, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia metabolism, Cervix Uteri surgery, Diagnostic Errors statistics & numerical data, Precancerous Conditions diagnosis, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms diagnosis, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia diagnosis
- Abstract
At our institution, 17% of cervical conization specimens are reported as negative for dysplasia or malignancy. To identify sources of error, we reviewed 53 negative conization specimens and their prior and follow-up cytology, biopsy, and endocervical curettage specimens. Examination of deeper-level sections and p16 immunostaining were performed on all conization specimens and selected biopsy specimens. Dysplasia was detected in 26% (14/53) of conization specimens. Twenty-eight percent (15/53) of cones were truly negative, and the presurgical material had been overcalled as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). Forty-five percent (24/53) of cones were truly negative and HSIL was confirmed in the presurgical material. Of these, 11% (6/53) showed subsequent evidence of residual dysplasia and 26% (14/53) were negative on further follow-up. Deeper-level sections, p16 immunostains, and consensus review may help identify squamous dysplasia in conization specimens and may prevent the overdiagnosis of HSIL on cervical biopsies.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF