Search

Objectives The 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been criticized for failing to stratify patients. We aimed to reassess and modify the tumor staging criteria for HCC. Methods Three independent study cohorts were collected and analyzed. Results The initial cohort consists of 103 patients with HCC. By Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the 8th edition failed to distinguish between T1b and T2. Only tumor size and large vessel invasion, but not small vessel invasion or other histopathologic parameters, predicted HCC survival. We modified the T staging criteria by eliminating small vessel invasion while emphasizing tumor size in the middle categories (T2 and T3), which achieved more even distribution of cases and significantly improved risk stratifications (P Conclusions Our study showed that tumor size, but not small vessel invasion, predicts survival in patients with HCC. We suggest incorporating our modified T staging criteria in future AJCC revisions.

ObjectivesPlasma cell–rich rejection (PCCR), also known as “plasma cell hepatitis” or “de novo autoimmune hepatitis,” is a cause of allograft dysfunction occurring post–liver transplantation (LT). Patients often develop allograft failure and may require repeat LT. PCRR may fall within the spectrum of different histologies associated with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which is associated with donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and positive complement component C4 (C4d) immunostaining. We sought to analyze the histologic and clinical outcomes of patients having biopsy-proven PCRR as well as to examine its C4d staining and DSA profiles.MethodsWe identified patients having PCRR between 2000 and 2020 using the electronic pathology database at our institution. We included patients who underwent at least one follow-up liver biopsy after establishing the PCRR diagnosis to assess future histologic progression and outcomes. Mean fluorescence intensity for at least one single DSA of 2,000 or higher was considered positive. Histologic diagnosis of PCRR was independently made by an experienced liver pathologist.ResultsA total of 35 patients were included in the study. Hepatitis C virus was the most common etiology for LT (59.5%). Mean ± SD age at LT was 49.0 ± 12.7 years. Forty percent of patients developed PCRR within 2 years of LT. Most patients (68.5%) had negative outcomes, with progression from PCRR to cirrhosis or chronic ductopenic rejection (CDR). Patients who had hepatitis C virus were more likely to develop cirrhosis rather than CDR following the PCRR diagnosis (P = .01). Twenty-three (65.7%) patients had at least one prior episode of T-cell–mediated rejection before being diagnosed with PCRR. DSAs were positive in 16 of 19 patients assessed, and C4d immunostaining was positive in 9 of 10 patients.ConclusionsDevelopment of PCRR negatively affects liver allograft outcomes and patient survival after LT. The presence of DSA and C4d in PCRR patients supports it to be within the histologic spectrum of AMR.

Objectives Amiodarone-induced liver injury (AILI) is histopathologically similar to alcoholic steatohepatitis (ASH). We sought to elucidate their histologic differences and develop a scoring system to differentiate these two entities. Methods A cohort of 17 AILI and 17 ASH cases was included in the initial study. Cases from three different institutions were included for further validation. Results Macrovesicular steatosis was usually below 10% of the liver parenchyma in AILI. Hepatocyte ballooning degeneration was more common in ASH than in AILI. “Balloon-like” hepatocyte was more common in AILI than in ASH. Lobular neutrophilic inflammation, satellitosis, and cholestasis were more common in ASH. Mallory-Denk bodies and pericellular fibrosis in AILI were mainly located in zone 1 compared with a panacinar or zone 3 distribution in ASH. A scoring system was developed in which points were assigned to different histologic features; a total sum of less than 5 suggests AILI, more than 5 is ASH, and 5 is equivocal. This scoring system was then evaluated on a test cohort comprising 14 AILI cases, in which 13 cases were correctly assigned with a score less than 5. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosing AILI in the test cohort were 92.9%, 91.7%, and 92.3%, respectively. Conclusions This scoring system can aid pathologists to differentiate AILI from ASH.

Introduction/Objective Variable histologic findings that may be seen in porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) liver biopsies are subject to high interobserver variability, requiring correlation with clinical history of portal hypertension (traditionally interpreted as non-cirrhotic portal hypertension NCPH). We investigated which histologic features are reproducible in PSVD biopsies. Methods Archived liver biopsies (n=38) from patients with NCPH (n=14) and without NCPH (n=21) were reviewed. Static H&E images of lobules (L, x100, NCPH=27, non-NCPH=23) and portal tracts (P, x200, NCPH=23, non- NCPH=27) were distributed among 9 gastrointestinal pathologists blinded to clinical history. Each pathologist answered multiple choice questions based on the presence (Q2) or absence (Q1) of portal hypertension clinically. The choice selected by 6 pathologists or more was considered consensus answer for the image. The interpretation of the image was considered reproducible when consensus was reached on both Q1 and Q2. Results The interpretations of 27 (54%; 17L, 10P) images from NCPH and 21 (42%; 10L, 11P) from non-NCPH were reproducible. In NCPH, the interpretations of normal (n=10, 4L, 6P), sinusoidal dilatation (n=7), and increased parenchymal draining vessels (n=3) were reproducible, while there was no consensus on the diagnoses of nodular regeneration and increased number of portal vessels. In non-NCPH, the interpretations of normal (n=8, 2L, 6P), sinusoidal dilatation (n=6), and paraportal shunting vessel(s) (n=4) were reproducible, whereas no consensus was reached on the diagnoses of nodular regeneration, incomplete fibrous septa, and increased number of portal vessels. Conclusion Histologic assessment of normal L and P as well as sinusoidal dilatation appears to be reproducible independent of clinical history. The findings of increased parenchymal draining vessels in NCPH group and paraportal shunting vessels in non-NCPH group may be consistently diagnosed to a certain extent. The assessment for nodular regeneration without reticulin stain, incomplete fibrous septa, or increased number of portal vessels appears to be unreliable.