Search

Purpose: The role of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in managing cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is evolving. This meta-analysis seeks to explore the influence of SGLT2i on the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) following catheter ablation (CA) in individuals with T2DM qualitatively and quantitatively. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in electronic databases. Studies meeting predefined criteria were included. Individual patient data (IPD) were used from reconstructed time-to-event data to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals for AF recurrence. IPD meta-analysis was followed by a direct meta-analysis to assess the risk of AF recurrence. Results: A total of five studies [one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and four cohort studies] were included in this study, and five studies were included in the qualitative analysis, while four studies comprising 1043 patients with T2DM were included in the quantitative analysis. The pooled Kaplan–Meier curve based on reconstructed data showed a significantly lower risk of AF recurrence in the SGLT2i group compared with all antidiabetic drugs (log-rank P = 0.00011) and dipeptidyl-peptidase IV inhibitors (DPP4i) (log-rank P = 0.01). Cox regression analysis showed consistent results. Direct meta-analysis showed that SGLT2i, compared with all antidiabetic medications (HR 0.57, 95% CI [0.44, 0.73], I2) and DPP4i (HR 0.41, 95% CI [0.24, 0.70], I2), was associated with a lower risk of AF recurrence. Conclusions: SGLT2i are associated with a reduced risk of AF recurrence after CA in patients with T2DM. These results suggest that SGLT2i is promising in improving clinical outcomes for this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dexmedetomidine has been shown to have antiarrhythmic effects by exhibiting sympatholytic properties and activating the vagus nerve in preclinical studies. Results from clinical trials of dexmedetomidine on atrial fibrillation (AF) following adult cardiac surgery are controversial. Materials and methods: We searched EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the antiarrhythmic effect of dexmedetomidine versus placebo or other anesthetic drugs in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of AF. The secondary outcomes were ventricular arrhythmias [ventricular fibrillation (VF), ventricular tachycardia (VT)], mechanical ventilation (MV) duration, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and hospital length of stay, and all-cause mortality. Results: Thirteen trials with a total of 1684 study patients were selected. Compared with controls, dexmedetomidine significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative AF [odds ratio (OR) 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58–0.97; P = 0.03] and VT (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.11–0.48; P < 0.0001). No significant difference for the incidence of VF existed (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.21–3.03; P = 0.74). There was no significant difference between groups in MV duration [weighted mean difference (WMD) − 0.10; 95% CI − 0.42 to 0.21; P = 0.52], postoperative ICU stay (WMD − 0.49; 95% CI − 2.64 to 1.66; P = 0.65), hospital stay (WMD − 0.01; 95% CI − 0.16 to 0.13; P = 0.88) and mortality (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.15–2.37; P = 0.46). Conclusions: Perioperative administration of dexmedetomidine in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery reduced the incidence of postoperative AF and VT. But there was no significant difference in incidence of VF, MV duration, ICU stay, hospital stay and mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure (HF) and a reduced ejection fraction. The efficacy of MRAs for AF prevention in patients with HF and a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unclear. Objectives: We performed a secondary analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled trial to determine the efficacy of spironolactone in reducing new-onset AF and recurrence of AF in 2733 patients with symptomatic HFpEF. Methods: Patients with and without prevalent AF at baseline were included, and those with permanent AF were excluded. Patients were randomized 1:1 to spironolactone or placebo. The risk of new-onset AF or the recurrence of AF was quantified using hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: At baseline, 2228 (64.7%) patients had no history of AF (spironolactone, n = 1111; placebo, n = 1117), whereas 505 (18.4%) patients had prevalent AF (spironolactone, n = 260; placebo, n = 245). During a median follow-up of 3.1 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.0–4.9), the incidence of new-onset AF was similar in both treatment arms: spironolactone 5.2% (n = 58) versus placebo 4.4% (n = 49); p = 0.41. The risk of new-onset AF was similar in both treatment arms: HR 1.19; 95% CI 0.81–1.74; p = 0.38. AF recurrence was also similar in both treatment arms during a median follow-up of 3.3 years (IQR 1.9–4.7): spironolactone 11.5% (n = 30) versus placebo 11.8% (n = 29); p = 1.00. The risk of recurrence of AF did not differ per treatment arm: HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.57–1.58; p = 0.83. Conclusion: Spironolactone does not reduce the risk of new-onset AF or AF recurrence in patients with HFpEF. This is in contrast to results in cohorts of patients with HF and a reduced ejection fraction. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT00094302 (TOPCAT). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Several studies have compared the cost effectiveness of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin using results from clinical trials evaluating NOACs. However, the time in therapeutic range (TTR) of warfarin groups ranged across clinical trials, and all were below the therapeutic goal of 70%. We compared the cost effectiveness of edoxaban 60 mg, apixaban 5 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, dabigatran 110 mg, rivaroxaban 20 mg, and well-managed warfarin with a TTR of 70% in preventing stroke among patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk of bleeding.Methods: For the six treatments, we used a Markov state-transition model to quantify lifetime costs in $US and effectiveness in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). We simulated relative risk ratios of clinical events with each NOAC versus warfarin with a TTR of 70% using published regression models that predict how the incidence of thrombotic or hemorrhagic events changes for each unit change in TTR. We re-ran our analysis for two other estimates of TTR: 65 and 75%.Results: Treatment with edoxaban 60 mg cost $US127,520/QALY gained compared with warfarin with a TTR of 70% and cost $US41,860/QALY gained compared with warfarin with a TTR of 65%. However, warfarin with a TTR of 75% was more effective and less expensive than all NOACs. For three levels of TTR, apixaban 5 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, dabigatran 110 mg, and rivaroxaban 20 mg were dominated strategies.Conclusions: The comparative cost effectiveness of edoxaban and warfarin is highly sensitive to TTR. At the $US100,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, our results suggest that warfarin is the most cost-effective treatment for patients who can achieve a TTR of 70%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication of cardiothoracic surgery (CTS). Existing evidence about the potential protective role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]) for post-CTS AF has been limited and conflicting. In this singleblind, open-label, randomized prospective pilot study, we evaluated the potential protective role of irbesartan (an ARB) in post-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) AF. Methods: A total of 100 consecutive patients undergoing CABG were randomly assigned to irbesartan (n = 50) versus no irbesartan (n = 50) for 5 days prior to the scheduled surgery. Data were collected for imaging studies, laboratory values, and peri-operative details. Patients were monitored post-operatively for in-hospital AF episodes. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of irbesartan on the incidence of post-CABG AF. Results:Atotal of 14 patients developedAFduring their post-operative hospital stay. The incidence ofAFin patients who received irbesartan was 6% (n = 3) compared with 22% (n = 11) in patients who did not receive irbesartan (p = 0.021). Univariate logistic regression analysis identified irbesartan and age as statistically significant variables. An adjusted multivariate logistic model identified irbesartan as an important protective factor against development of post-CABG AF (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04, 0.94; p = 0.04). Increasing age (adjusted OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01, 1.17; p = 0.03) was also identified as an independent risk factor for development of post-CABG AF. Conclusion: Pretreatment with irbesartan tends to have a significant protective effect against the occurrence of AF during the post-operative period in patients undergoing CABG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent arrhythmia found in clinical practice. The majority of patients With AF are still candidates for antiarrhythmic drug treatment, not only for acute reversion to sinus rhythm but also for long-term treatment to prevent recurrences of AF. Currently available antiarrhythmic drugs, however, are unable to provide complete efficacy in all patients, and present problematic risks of proarrhythmia. The progressively increasing prevalence of AF supports the need to develop improved therapeutic approaches for the clinical management of arrhythmia. Accordingly, new treatment techniques aimed at suppressing the origin of the arrhythmogenic foci have been developed in the last decade. However, ablative treatments are only available for selected patients. Because of these factors, and also because primary prevention of AF should be our goal, the introduction of non-antiarrhythmic agents that could prevent both new-onset AF and recurrences of AF may eventually improve patient outcomes and reduce the incidence of this epidemic disease. The potential clinical value of these non-antiarrhythmic options is currently under active investigation. There is now clinical and experimental evidence that many drugs may have beneficial effects in preventing AF through several possible mechanisms. Non-antiarrhythmic drugs, such as ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), corticosteroids, and N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids may have a positive effect in patients with AF or in preventing AF in patients at risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]