Acute renal failure after contrast media injection has been recognized for at least 35 years but the exact mechanism responsible for the renal injury remains an enigma. The clinical characteristics of contrast-induced nephropathy (CAN) are well-known although more recently the nonoliguric presentation has occurred at an increased frequency--in 70 to 90% of cases. For nonoliguric presentation of CAN, one can expect an asymptomatic increase in serum creatinine, the mean peak occurring at 4.2 days. If oliguric, the fractional excretion of sodium will be A popular scheme has been proposed to describe the possible sequence by which ischemia or nephrotoxins, or both, induce acute renal failure. In particular, a vascular mechanism (i.e., ischemia), is an appealing explanation for CAN since acute changes in renal hemodynamics after contrast media injection have been confirmed by several animal experiments. Unlike other vascular beds in which contrast media induce acute vasoconstriction followed by vasodilatation, the initial effect on the renal circulation is acute vasodilation, followed by progressive vasoconstriction, increasing renal vascular resistance and a concomitant decrease in both renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate. The intensity of the vasoconstrictive phase is reduced by either simultaneous volume repletion or pretreatment with a high-salt diet. However, these renal hemodynamic changes are short-lived, with complete return to normal within 1 to 2 hours after the procedure. Since clinically significant CAN involves continued deterioration of renal function for 3 to 10 days after the procedure, a more severe experimental renal insult is needed to mimic the clinical state. Examination of patients at risk for CAN (i.e., chronic renal insufficiency, diabetic nephropathy, congestive heart failure and hypertension) reveals that preexisting renal ischemia is a common association. Under these circumstances, renal ischemia will include stimulation of both endogenous vasoconstrictors (angiotensin II, norepinephrine and vasopressin) and vasodilator substances (prostaglandin [I.sub.2] [[PGI.sub.2]] and prostaglandin [E.sub.2] [[PGE.sub.2]]. A disturbance of this balanced vasoconstrictor/vasodilator action on renal circulation will cause acute deterioration of renal function. Animal experiments suggest that contrast agents act in a manner similar to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents by selectively inhibiting the vasodilation caused by prostaglandins and inducing renal dysfunction. Circulating angiotensin II causes both renal vasoconstriction, principally in the efferent arterioles, and de novo synthesis of vasodilator prostaglandins. In the unstimulated state, circulating angiotensin II induces a balanced state between constriction and dilatation resulting in normal renal vascular resistance. When renin release is stimulated, the associated increase in angiotensin II results in increased vasoconstrictive and vasodilatory actions, with the final effect on renal vascular resistance being either unchanged or modestly increased. However, selective interference with the prostaglandin limb of the stimulation causes a reduction in renal blood flow, and the possibility of a reduction in glomerular filtration rate. From animal studies one of the effects of contrast media is to interfere with [PGI.sub.2] production, thus resembling nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs with regard to the pathophysiologic process leading to acute renal failure. (Am J Cardiol 1990;66:18F-22F), Renal (kidney) failure is an uncommon but potentially fatal complication of the injection of contrast agents for the visualization of blood vessels by X-ray. Although the association between contrast agents and renal failure has been recognized for almost four decades, the precise mechanisms remains unclear. While the first cases to be noted involved oliguria, or reduced urine production, it is now recognized that perhaps as many as 90 percent of the cases of renal toxicity are asymptomatic and may be detected as an increase in the levels of creatinine in the blood. Fortunately, most such patients will recover, and fewer than 10 percent will require dialysis. The function of the kidney may be conveniently thought of as two contributing processes, the filtration of the blood, which relies on adequate perfusion of the kidney, and the resorption and secretion processes of the kidney tubules, which reclaim water and important ions and nutrients. The use of contrast media may affect both these processes. Most of the body's blood vessels react to the injection of contrast agents with an acute constriction followed by prolonged relaxation. However, the blood vessels of the kidneys seem to respond in the opposite manner; an initial dilation is followed by a progressive constriction. This, of course, reduces the flow of blood through the kidneys and thus the glomerular filtration. These effects are only important for a few hours, however, while contrast-associated nephropathy involves continued deterioration for 3 to 10 days. The ischemia resulting from inadequate blood flow may also cause tubule damage. Experiments with animals, however, have indicated that the progressive kidney dysfunction may result from upsetting the normal working of the renin-angiotensin system, which moderates blood pressure. In the normally functioning kidney, the vasoconstricting effects of angiotensin II are balanced by prostaglandins. The authors suggest that the contrast media interfere with the production of prostaglandins, and therefore the action of the angiotensin II proceeds unopposed. According to this hypothesis, the nephropathy caused by contrast media would be directly comparable to that caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. (Consumer Summary produced by Reliance Medical Information, Inc.)