Search

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Some of these patients have preexisting AF as well. The management of these patients is complex, especially after the procedure, when there is a sudden change in hemodynamics. There are no established guidelines about the management of the patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement with preexisting or new-onset AF. This review article discusses the management of these patients with rate and rhythm control strategies with medications. This article also highlights the role of newer oral anticoagulation medications and left atrial occlusion devices to prevent stroke after the procedure. We will also discuss new advances in the care of this patient population to prevent the occurrence of AF after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. In conclusion, this article is a synopsis of both pharmacologic and device interventions for the management of AF in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In older patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, an initial invasive strategy reduces cardiovascular events compared with an ischemia-guided approach; however its association with health status outcomes is unknown. Among patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction from 2 multicenter US acute myocardial infarction (AMI) registries, health status was assessed at baseline and at 1, 6, and 12 months after AMI using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). Routine invasive management was defined as coronary angiography within 72 hours of admission without a preceding stress test. Among 3,559 patients with NSTEMI, 2,455 (69.0%) were treated with routine invasive treatment, which was more common in younger patients. In propensity-adjusted analyses, invasive treatment was associated with higher SAQ physical limitation, angina frequency, and summary scores over the year after AMI; however, the differences were small (<5 points, all p <0.05). Although there was a trend toward worse health status in patients aged ≥85 years treated with an initial invasive treatment, the interaction between age and treatment for any health status measure (all p ≥0.09) was not significant, except for SF-12 physical component score (p = 0.02), where worse scores were observed with invasive treatment in patients 85 years or older. In conclusion, an initial invasive treatment for patients with NSTEMI is associated with a small benefit in health status of marginal clinical significance, mainly in younger patients. The oldest old group trended toward less health status benefit from a routine invasive strategy-results that will need to be confirmed in a larger study., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Stress testing is endorsed by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Appropriate Use Criteria to identify appropriate candidates for Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). However, the relation between stress test risk classification and health status after CTO PCI is not known. We studied 449 patients in the 12-center OPEN CTO registry who underwent stress testing before successful CTO PCI, comparing outcomes of patients with low-risk (LR) versus intermediate to high-risk (IHR) findings. Health status was assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency (SAQ AF), Quality of Life (SAQ QoL), and Summary Scores (SAQ SS). Stress tests were LR in 40 (8.9%) and IHR in 409 (91.1%) patients. There were greater improvements on the SAQ AF (LR vs IHR 14.2 ± 2.7 vs 23.3 ± 1.3 points, p <0.001) and SAQ SS (LR vs IHR 20.8 ± 2.3 vs 25.4 ± 1.1 points, p = 0.03) in patients with IHR findings, but there was no difference between groups on the SAQ QoL domain (LR vs IHR 24.8 ± 3.4 vs 27.3 ± 1.6 points, p = 0.42). We observed large health status improvements after CTO PCI in both the LR and IHR groups, with the greatest reduction in angina among those with IHR stress tests. Although patients with higher risk studies may experience greater reduction in angina symptoms, on average, patients with LR stress tests also experienced large improvements in symptoms after CTO PCI, suggesting patients with refractory symptoms should be considered appropriate candidates for CTO PCI regardless of stress test findings., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Early invasive management improves outcomes in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The association between preinfarct health status and the selecting patients for early invasive management is unknown. The Prospective Registry Evaluating outcomes after Myocardial Infarctions: Events and Recovery and Translational Research Investigating Underlying disparities in acute Myocardial infarction Patients' Health status are consecutive US multicenter registries, in which the associations between preinfarct angina frequency and quality of life (both assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire on admission) and the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score and referral to early invasive management (coronary angiography within 48 hours) were evaluated using Poisson regression, after adjusting for site, demographics, and clinical and psychosocial variables. Of 3,768 patients with NSTEMI, 2,182 (57.9%) patients were referred for early invasive treatment. Patients with excellent, good, or very good baseline angina-specific quality of life, respectively, were more likely to receive early angiography, even after adjustment, as compared with patients reporting poor baseline quality of life because of angina (62.1.0%, 60.9%, 59.6%, vs 51.2%; adjusted relative risk [RR] = 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04 to 1.16; RR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.27; RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.31, respectively). Finally, patients with a GRACE score in the highest risk decile (199.5 to <321.4) had significantly lower rates of early invasive treatment (42.7%) than patients in the lowest decile of risk (67.6%; adjusted RR for continuous GRACE score per SD [1 SD = 40 points], 0.96, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.99, p = 0.019). In conclusion, in this real-world NSTEMI cohort, patients with the highest mortality risk and worst health status were less likely to be referred for early invasive management. Further work is needed to understand the role of preinfarct health status and in-hospital treatment strategy., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)