Search

Cardiac rehabilitation improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Recently there has been a growing interest in remote cardiac rehabilitation (RCR) programs. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of RCR compared with center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR). This is an observational study including patients after hospital admission for ACS. The study group included patients at low-to-moderate risk for cardiovascular complications who were referred for RCR. The control group included patients at similar risk who participated in CBCR. The primary end points were the improvement of at least 10% to 25% in exercise capacity after 6 months of cardiac rehabilitation. Included were 305 patients who completed 6 months of cardiac rehabilitation. Of them, 107 patients participated in RCR and 198 in CBCR. RCR patients were younger and more frequently males. Improvement of ≥10% in exercise capacity after 6 months was achieved more frequently in patients participating in RCR compared with CBCR (69.3% and 55% respectively, p = 0.03). A similar trend was observed for improvement of ≥25% in exercise capacity after 6 months (33.8% and 22.7% in RCR and CBCR, respectively, p = 0.05). While weight reduction and the increase in muscle mass were similar in the 2 groups, fat percent reduction was significantly greater in the RCR compared with the CBCR (2.5% and 1.4% respectively, p <0.005). We conclude that RCR program is an effective and safe option for low-risk patients after hospital admission for ACS. It enables optimizing the utilization of this important service for patients with coronary artery disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Frailty has been associated with poor outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). We aimed to assess the accuracy of the Eyeball test for frailty assessment in elderly patients with CVD. This is a prospective study including stable patients ≥75 years old who were followed-up in a cardiology clinic. Frailty assessment was performed separately through the Eyeball test and the Fried test in a blinded way. Cardiologists were asked to rate the frailty status of participants based on their routine clinical assessment and grade frailty on a Fried-type scale (1 to 5, with frailty defined as a score ≥3). Each patient then underwent formal frailty assessment using the Fried test. Included were 300 consecutive patients with a mean age of 81 ± 6 years. Frailty was diagnosed in 109 (36%) and 125 patients (41%) according to the Fried and Eyeball tests, respectively. The Eyeball test demonstrated 86% sensitivity and 82% specificity for the diagnosis of frailty. A receiver operating characteristics curve analysis demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.82 for the diagnosis of frailty. The Eyeball test demonstrated a very high negative predictive value of 90% and a modest positive predictive value of 73% for frailty assessment. Similar results were observed after subgroup analysis according to age and gender. In conclusion, the Eyeball test is an accurate method to rule out frailty in elderly patients with CVD. However, when frailty is suspected based on the Eyeball test, a formal tool such as the Fried test should be used to confirm the diagnosis., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased cardiovascular risk. The CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years, diabetes mellitus, previous stroke, vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, female gender) has been used to predict thromboembolic risk in patients with nonvalvular AF. We aimed to evaluate the association between the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score and the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and all-cause mortality in patients with AF treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The study was based on the Clalit Health Services database. Included were 21,129 patients with nonvalvular AF treated with DOACs. Patients were stratified into four groups according to the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score. 1-9 The primary end point was the occurrence of AMI and all-cause mortality. During 21,129 patient-years, there were 1,253 incidents (5.9%) of AMI. A higher CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was associated with a significantly increased risk of AMI (7.8, 14.9, 23.9, and 35.3 cases per 1,000 person-years, for patients with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of 1 to 2, 3 to 4, 5 to 6, and 7 to 9, respectively, p <0.001). Each 1-point increase in the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was associated with a 27% increased risk of AMI. A higher CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was also associated with a significantly increased ll-cause mortality rate (21.7, 60.2, 103.9, 162.6 cases per 1,000 person-years, for patients with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of 1 to 2, 3 to 4, 5 to 6, 7 to 9, respectively, p <0.001). All associations remained statistically significant after a multivariate analysis. In conclusion, among patients with nonvalvular AF treated with DOACs, the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was associated with increased risk of AMI and all-cause mortality., Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Despite advances in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), a subgroup of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are still managed medically by a conservative approach. We sought to characterize a contemporary, large-scale, real-world cohort of ACS patients treated conservatively via pharmacological management, without PCI. Data was gathered from the ACS Israeli Survey (ACSIS) between 2000 and 2016, encompassing all consecutive patients admitted to cardiology wards with an ACS diagnosis. Included were 3,543 conservatively managed patients with non-ST elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). Patients with ST elevation MI or those who underwent any coronary revascularization (PCI or bypass surgery) were excluded. Primary endpoints were 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and 1-year mortality. The study cohort was divided to 4 time-periods. Over 2 decades, medically managed NSTE-ACS patients remained of similar age (67 ± 13 years, p = 0.78), but had more atherosclerotic risk-factors and comorbidities. During time, patients were more often referred to diagnostic angiography and treated with statins, ACE-I/ARBs, and P2Y12 inhibitors (p < 0.001 for each). Over time, there were less in-hospital complications such as kidney injury and heart failure. The rate of 30-day MACE decreased (from 20.7% to 10.3%, earliest to latest period, p < 0.001). Compared with the earliest period, the latest period was associated with a reduction in 1-year mortality (14.7% to 11.6%; adjusted HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.90). In conclusion, Over 2 decades, in medically managed NSTE-ACS patients, short term prognosis has significantly improved while 1-year mortality demonstrated improvement only recently, likely due to incremental benefits of medical management., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score has been routinely used for risk stratification of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. We aimed to examine whether the addition of the CHA2DS2-VASc score to the GRACE score improves risk stratification. Included were patients with ACS who were divided into high (>140), intermediate (110< GRACE score ≤140) and low (<110) GRACE score. Each group was further divided into 3 subgroups categorized according to their CHA2DS2-VASc score: 0-1, 2-3, and ≥4. Management and Outcomes were compared for each GRACE score group and CHA2DS2-VASc score subgroups. Included 6,854 ACS patients, of them 3596 (52.5%) were classified as low risk, 1,937 (28.3%) were at intermediate risk and 1,321 (19.3%) were high-risk patients. In the intermediate risk group, patients with a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score more frequently underwent percutaneous coronary revascularization. For low risk patients, 30-day mortality rates were 0.8%, 1.5%, and 1.3% (p = 0.02), and 1-year all-cause mortality rates were 1.3%, 3%, and 2.6% (p = 0.002) for CHA2DS2-VASc score 0-1, 2-3, ≥4, respectively. For intermediate risk patients, 30-day mortality rates were 2.9%, 3.4%, and 3.8% (p = 0.8), and 1-year all-cause mortality rates were 6.4%, 7.8%, and 11.2% (p = 0.01) for CHA2DS2-VASc score 0-1, 2-3, ≥4, respectively. Among patients with a GRACE score <140, each 1 point increase in the CHA2DS2-VASc score was associated with a 57% increase in 1-year mortality rates. In conclusion, the addition of the CHA2DS2-VASc score to the GRACE risk score in ACS patients improves risk stratification of patients with low and intermediate risk., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Therefore, target low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level in patients with PAD is ≤70 mg/dl, similar to patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, despite their high cardiovascular risk, patients with PAD less frequently achieve LDL cholesterol goals compared to patients with CAD. We aimed to compare LDL cholesterol control in patients after first coronary or peripheral vascular intervention. Included were patients ≥18 years of age without a history of cardiovascular disease who underwent first coronary or peripheral vascular intervention from 2004 through 2010. Primary end points were percentage of patients who achieved the LDL cholesterol goal of <100 and <70 mg/dl. Of 9,138 patients available for analysis, 7,512 (82.2%) underwent first coronary revascularization and 1,626 (17.8%) underwent first peripheral revascularization. Patients after first coronary revascularization were treated more frequently with any statin and with highly potent statins. Furthermore, they more frequently achieved the LDL cholesterol goals compared to patients after first peripheral intervention. This was true for the LDL cholesterol goal of <100 mg/dl (65% and 46.7%, p <0.0001) and for the lower LDL cholesterol goal of <70 mg/dl (23.3% and 13.3%, p <0.0001). Differences in LDL cholesterol control between the 2 groups remained statistically significant after multivariate adjustment. In conclusion, lipid control in patients with PAD is poor and significantly inferior to that of patients with CAD even after the first vascular intervention., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Fasting glucose levels elevated beyond the normal range have been associated with increased cardiovascular risk. However, it is unknown whether this association exists for variations of fasting glucose within the normal range. The present study was conducted using the computerized database of the Sharon-Shomron District of Clalit Health Services. Included in the present study were subjects with fasting glucose levels within the normal range (< 100 mg/dl). We excluded patients with a history of cardiovascular disease or diabetes. The primary outcome was the incidence of coronary revascularization with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting. The 28,263 participants (age 53.7 ± 12.2 years) were divided into quartiles according to the fasting glucose level (75.4 ± 4.5, 83.6 ± 1.7, 88.9 ± 1.4, and 95.1 ± 2.2 mg/dl). During a mean follow-up of 5.9 ± 0.7 years, 424 subjects required coronary revascularization. A progressive increase was seen in the risk of coronary revascularization as the fasting glucose levels increased within the normal range (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.3, p > 0.001, between the fourth and first quartiles). However, this association lost its statistical significance after adjustments for the conventional coronary risk factors (hazard ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.62, p = 0.328). In conclusion, elevated fasting glucose levels within the normal range were associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. This association was caused by the greater prevalence of the other conventional risk factors and not by the glucose level itself., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)