Search

Three patients with advanced systemic sclerosis and recurrent or incessant monomorphic ventricular tachycardia underwent cardiac electrophysiologic studies. Biventricular transcatheter mapping showed findings most compatible with a reentrant mechanism, which was effectively treated with transcatheter ablation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current guidelines have indicated an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for patients with severe idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, for both primary and secondary prevention. Compared to coronary artery disease, the overall benefit has been smaller. A more refined risk assessment, using the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and prevention mode (primary/secondary), is still needed to guide ICD implantation. Patients included in 2 large ICD registers were analyzed regarding the appropriate therapies and improvement of LVEF, overall and in subgroups of prevention mode and LVEF <20% versus >20%. Overall, 349 patients were included; 70% were men, the mean age was 54 years, and the mean follow-up was 33 months. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was used in 57%, and secondary prevention was present in 30%. ICD therapies were delivered to 33% of the patients, in most for ventricular tachycardia. Patients receiving an ICD for secondary prevention and non-CRT were more likely to have arrhythmic events (both p <0.05). The cumulative event rates at 5 years were 53% for secondary and 33% for primary prevention (p <0.001). Depending on the prevention mode and LVEF status (<20% vs >20%), the event rates ranged from 30% to 76%. The mean LVEF improved by 10%, independently of the stimulation mode (CRT 22% to 31%, non-CRT 26% to 35%; p <0.0001). A persistent improvement to >35% was seen in only 25% of CRT patients but in 45% of non-CRT patients (p = 0.004). In conclusion, the results from the present study have demonstrated that in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, the potential for LVEF improvement is considerable and that the rate of ICD interventions strongly depends on the prevention mode and LVEF. These findings could be the basis for additional risk stratification tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Little is known about the effect of revascularization in patients > or =75 years of age with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) for whom periprocedural risk and overall mortality are increased. Therefore, we examined the 301 patients of the Trial of Invasive versus Medical therapy in the Elderly with symptomatic CAD (TIME) with special regard to diabetic status. Patients were randomized to an invasive versus optimized medical strategy. The median follow-up was 4.1 years (range 0.1 to 6.9). Patients with DM (n = 69) had a greater incidence of hypertension (73% vs 58%, p = 0.03), > or =2 risk factors (93% vs 46%, p <0.01), previous heart failure (22% vs 12%, p = 0.04), and previous myocardial infarction (59% vs 43%, p = 0.02), and a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (48% vs 54%, p = 0.02) than did patients without DM. Mortality was greater in patients with DM than in those without DM (41% vs 25%, p = 0.01; adjusted hazard ratio 1.86, p = 0.01). Revascularization improved the overall survival rate from 61% (no revascularization) to 79% (p <0.01; adjusted hazard ratio 1.68, p = 0.03), an effect similarly observed in patients with and without DM. The event-free survival rate was 11% in nonrevascularized patients with DM compared with 40% in nonrevascularized patients without DM and 41% and 53% in revascularized patients with and without DM, respectively (p <0.01). Angina severity and antianginal drug use were similar for patients with and without DM, but those with DM performed worse in daily activities and physical functioning. In conclusion, elderly diabetic patients with chronic angina have a worse outcome than those with DM but benefit similarly from revascularization regarding symptom relief and long-term outcome. However, physical functioning related to daily activities is reduced in those with DM and may need special attention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Little is known about the effect of revascularization in patients ≥75 years of age with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) for whom periprocedural risk and overall mortality are increased. Therefore, we examined the 301 patients of the Trial of Invasive versus Medical therapy in the Elderly with symptomatic CAD (TIME) with special regard to diabetic status. Patients were randomized to an invasive versus optimized medical strategy. The median follow-up was 4.1 years (range 0.1 to 6.9). Patients with DM (n = 69) had a greater incidence of hypertension (73% vs 58%, p = 0.03), ≥2 risk factors (93% vs 46%, p &#60;0.01), previous heart failure (22% vs 12%, p = 0.04), and previous myocardial infarction (59% vs 43%, p = 0.02), and a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (48% vs 54%, p = 0.02) than did patients without DM. Mortality was greater in patients with DM than in those without DM (41% vs 25%, p = 0.01; adjusted hazard ratio 1.86, p = 0.01). Revascularization improved the overall survival rate from 61% (no revascularization) to 79% (p &#60;0.01; adjusted hazard ratio 1.68, p = 0.03), an effect similarly observed in patients with and without DM. The event-free survival rate was 11% in nonrevascularized patients with DM compared with 40% in nonrevascularized patients without DM and 41% and 53% in revascularized patients with and without DM, respectively (p &#60;0.01). Angina severity and antianginal drug use were similar for patients with and without DM, but those with DM performed worse in daily activities and physical functioning. In conclusion, elderly diabetic patients with chronic angina have a worse outcome than those with DM but benefit similarly from revascularization regarding symptom relief and long-term outcome. However, physical functioning related to daily activities is reduced in those with DM and may need special attention. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]