Search

The efficacy and safety of nisoldipine-extended release (ER) and amlodipine were compared in a 6-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, titration-to-effect trial in patients with stage 1 to 2 systemic hypertension (90 to 109 mm Hg diastolic blood pressure [BP]) and chronic stable angina pectoris. After a 3-week placebo run-in period, patients (n = 120) were randomly assigned to active treatment with either nisoldipine-ER (20 to 40 mg) or amlodipine (5 to 10 mg) once daily, titrated as necessary after 2 weeks to achieve diastolic BP <90 mm Hg. After 6 weeks, the mean reduction in systolic/diastolic BP from baseline was 15/13 mm Hg with nisoldipine-ER and 13/11 mm Hg with amlodipine (p = NS/p = NS). Both drugs resulted in similar BP responder rates (diastolic BP <90 mm Hg in 87% of patients who received nisoldipine-ER and 78% of patients on amlodipine, p = NS) and anti-ischemic responder rates (increasing exercise time >20% in 20% and 27%, respectively [p = NS], and increasing exercise time >60 seconds in 32% and 29% of patients, respectively [p = NS]. Also, after 6 weeks of active therapy, there was a similar mean increase in total exercise duration (23 seconds in the nisoldipine-ER group and 21 seconds in the amlodipine group, p = NS). Neither drug increased heart rate and both decreased frequency of anginal episodes. Adverse events were infrequent, and typically were vasodilator-related effects (including headache and peripheral edema) that occurred with somewhat higher incidence in the nisoldipine-ER group. Thus, nisoldipine-ER and amlodipine provided comparable antihypertensive and anti-ischemic efficacy, and both were generally well tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The comparative antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan cilexetil and the calcium channel blocker amlodipine were evaluated in an 8-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, forced-titration study in 251 adult patients (45% women, 16% black) with mild hypertension (stage 1). Following a 4- to 5-week placebo run-in period, patients with sitting diastolic blood pressure (BP) of 90 to 99 mm Hg received candesartan cilexetil 16 mg (n = 123) or amlodipine 5 mg (n = 128) once daily. After 4 weeks of double-blind treatment, patients were uptitrated to candesartan cilexetil 32 mg or amlodipine 10 mg once daily. There were no significant differences between the candesartan cilexetil and amlodipine regimens for reducing BP; mean systolic BP/diastolic BP reductions were -15.2/-10.2 mm Hg versus -15.4/-11.3 mm Hg, respectively (p = 0.88/0.25). Overall, 79% of patients on candesartan cilexetil and 87% of those on amlodipine were controlled (diastolic BP <90 mm Hg). A total of 3.3% of patients on candesartan cilexetil discontinued treatment, compared with 9.4% of patients on amlodipine, including 2.4% versus 4.7% for adverse events and 0% versus 1.6% for peripheral edema, respectively. Peripheral edema, the prespecified primary tolerability end point, occurred with significantly greater frequency in patients on amlodipine (22.1%; mild 8.7%, moderate 11.8%, severe 1.6%) versus patients on candesartan cilexetil (8.9%; mild 8.1%, moderate 0.8%) (p = 0.005). Candesartan cilexetil and amlodipine are both highly effective in controlling BP in patients with mild hypertension. Candesartan cilexetil offers a significant tolerability advantage with respect to less risk of developing peripheral edema. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the potent angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan cilexetil were evaluated in 217 adult patients (68% men, 41% black) with severe systemic hypertension on background therapy with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in a 4-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients with sitting diastolic blood pressure (BP) > or =110 mm Hg during the placebo run-in received HCTZ 12.5 mg once daily for 1 week. Those with sitting diastolic BP >95 mm Hg after the HCTZ run-in were randomized (2:1) to receive candesartan cilexetil 8 mg once daily (n = 141) or placebo (n = 76), plus HCTZ 12.5 mg. After 1 week of double-blind treatment, patients with sitting diastolic BP > or =90 mm Hg were uptitrated to candesartan cilexetil 16 mg once daily or matching placebo, plus HCTZ 12.5 mg; 84% required uptitration. Primary efficacy measurement was a change in trough (24+/-3 hours after treatment) sitting diastolic BP from the end of the HCTZ run-in to double-blind week 4. Mean changes in systolic and diastolic BP were significantly greater with candesartan cilexetil than with placebo, -11.3/-9.1 mm Hg versus -4.1/-3.1 mm Hg, p <0.001/p <0.001, respectively. Patients with higher sitting diastolic BP at the end of the HCTZ run-in tended to have greater decreases in BP (p <0.05). Most patients (53%) receiving candesartan cilexetil were responders (diastolic BP <90 mm Hg or > or =10 mm Hg decrease) and 32% were controlled (diastolic BP <90 mm Hg). Tolerability and safety profiles were similar in the candesartan and placebo groups. In conclusion, candesartan cilexetil 8 to 16 mg once daily was an effective and well-tolerated therapy for lowering BP when added to HCTZ 12.5 mg in a diverse population of patients with severe systemic hypertension in the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The results of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, forced-dose titration study in a diverse population of hypertensive patients in the US indicate that candesartan cilexetil has clinically meaningful dose-related blood pressure-lowering effects and that maximum blood pressure reduction is achieved with doses of 16 and 32 mg given once daily. This study confirms that candesartan cilexetil is a highly effective antihypertensive agent with an excellent tolerability and safety profile, without dose-related adverse effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objectives of this double-blind, multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled study were to evaluate the dose-related efficacy, tolerability, and safety of candesartan cilexetil, a potent, AT1 selective, long-acting angiotensin II receptor blocker, in 365 adult patients with systemic hypertension and mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (BP) of 95 to 114 mm Hg. Patients received either placebo or candesartan cilexetil 2, 4, 8, 16, or 32 mg once daily for 8 weeks. All doses of candesartan cilexetil reduced trough (24 hours after treatment) sitting diastolic and systolic BP significantly compared with placebo (p < 0.005). A significant (p < or = 0.0001) dose response was evident, with greater decreases in BP at higher doses. Mean changes in BP were -10.7/-7.8 mm Hg and -12.6/-10.2 mm Hg in the 16- and 32-mg groups, respectively, versus -0.3/-2.6 mm Hg in the placebo group. The 16- and 32-mg doses were consistently significantly superior to placebo in antihypertensive effect with regard to all BP measurements, including peak (6 hours after treatment), trough, sitting, and standing measurements of diastolic and systolic BP. Responder rates (trough sitting diastolic BP < 90 or > or = 10 mm Hg BP decrease) were 54% and 64% for the 16- and 32-mg groups, respectively. Tolerability and safety profiles were similar to placebo at all doses. In conclusion, candesartan cilexetil administered once daily effectively reduces BP in a dose-related manner while maintaining safety and tolerability; doses of 16 and 32 mg are most effective for treatment of hypertension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Electrocardiographic measures can facilitate the identification of patients at risk of death after acute coronary syndromes. This study evaluates a new risk metric, morphologic variability (MV), which measures beat-to-beat variability in the shape of the entire heart beat signal. This metric is analogous to heart rate variability (HRV) approaches, which focus on beat-to-beat changes in the heart rate. MV was calculated using a dynamic time-warping technique in 764 patients from the DISPERSE2 (TIMI 33) trial for whom 24-hour continuous electrocardiograph was recorded within 48 hours of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. The patients were evaluated during a 90-day follow-up for the end point of death. Patients with high MV showed an increased risk of death during follow-up (hazard ratio 8.46; p <0.001). The relationship between high MV and death could be observed even after adjusting for baseline clinical characteristics and HRV measures (adjusted hazard ratio 6.91; p = 0.001). Moreover, the correlation between MV and HRV was low (R < or =0.25). These findings were consistent among several subgroups, including patients under the age of 65 and those with no history of diabetes or hyperlipidemia. In conclusion, our results suggest that increased variation in the entire heart beat morphology is associated with a considerably elevated risk of death and may provide information complementary to the analysis of heart rate.

Eighteen open chest dogs anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium were studied to determine the role of early cycle premature ventricular beats in the initiation of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation during the initial 30 minutes of acute myocardial ischemia. The coupling interval and prematurity index (R-R'/R-R) of every premature beta after a sinus beat were determined during both the "immediate" (2 to 12 minutes) and "delayed" (13 to 30 minutes) phases of ventricular arrhythmias that follow acute coronary ligation. During the immediate phase, characterized by marked fractionation of local electrograms and delayed intramyocardial conduction, early cycle beats were infrequent (8 percent of extrasystoles) and initiated only 3 (4 percent) of 75 episodes of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. However, during the delayed phase, characterized by less fractionation and more uniform conduction, early cycle beats were both more frequent (24 percent of extrasystoles, p less than 0.001) and more successful (20 [34 percent] of 59 episodes, p less than 0.001) in initiating ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Thus, the underlying electrophysiologic derangements appeared to be of primary importance in determining both the frequency and relative malignancy of early cycle beats during acute myocardial ischemia.

Simultaneous hemodynamic and echocardiographic recordings were used to demonstrate mechanical atrial alternans during programmed atrioventricular (A-V) pacing in five open chest dogs. Each animal was studied in two stages, first with the A-V conduction system intact (phase I) and later after the experimental induction of complete A-V block (phase II). Atrial alternans was demonstrated during rapid atrial stimulation at cycle lengths ranging from 250 to 120 ms. During phase I, rapid atrial pacing resulted in complex combinations of variable A-V conduction disturbances with superimposed atrial and ventricular alternans. During phase II, atrial alternans could be observed during a programmed prolonged pause in ventricular activity. It is anticipated that this method will facilitate recognition of atrial alternans in various clinical situations and shed further light on its possible hemodynamic significance.

The potential application of diagnostic ultrasound to understanding of the hemodynamic effects of various rhythm and conduction disturbances has not been fully explored. To investigate the change in cardiac function associated with various atrioventricular (A-V) sequencing intervals during cardiac pacing, simultaneous M mode and two dimensional echocardigraphic and hemodynamic studies were performed in 23 dogs. One to one A-V and ventriculoatrial (V-A) sequential pacing at cycle lengths of 400 and 300 ms revealed a stepwise reduction in left ventricular pressure and cardiac output as the A-V interval was changed from +100 to -100 ms. These reductions in cardiac hemodynamics were associated with decreases in left ventricular and increases in left atrial dimensions determined with echocardiography. Mitral valve excursion and the duration of valve opening remained constant over the entire range of A-V intervals. There was angiographic evidence of retrograde blood flow from the left atrium into the pulmonary venous system at an A-V interval of -50 and -100 ms, but no evidence of mitral regurgitation. Thus, correlative echocardiographic and hemodynamic studies can suggest multiple pathophysiologic mechanisms contributing to the decrements in cardiac function observed during tachyarrhythmias with intact A-V conduction as well as those occurring consequent to A-V nodal Wenckebach cycles.

The safety and efficacy of bepridil plus propranolol therapy were investigated in a placebo-controlled, parallel-design, double-blind trial in 56 patients who were not responding to propranolol alone. Patients entering the study were receiving an average propranolol dosage of 131 mg/day (range 20 to 240). For the first 2 weeks of the study they were given placebo in addition to their propranolol dose, and then were randomized to receive continued placebo plus propranolol or bepridil plus propranolol therapy. The bepridil dosage was adjusted over the 8 weeks of active treatment to an average of 273 mg/day (range 200 to 400). The double-blind treatment period was followed by a 3-week washout period during which all patients received propranolol and placebo. The effects of treatment on the frequency of angina attacks, nitroglycerin consumption, exercise performance (treadmill-modified Bruce protocol) and Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) were assessed. Propranolol and bepridil plasma levels also were obtained. Improved antianginal efficacy and reduced nitroglycerin consumption were noted when bepridil was added to propranolol (p less than 0.01). During 8 weeks of combination treatment, exercise tolerance increased 1.0 +/- 1.2 minutes from a baseline of 7.3 +/- 2.2 with bepridil plus propranolol compared with an increase of 0.02 +/- 1.3 minutes from a baseline of 7.6 +/- 2.9 with placebo plus propranolol (p less than 0.01). With bepridil plus propranolol, there were also increases in exercise time to onset of angina (p less than 0.04), exercise time to 1-mm electrocardiographic ST-segment depression (p less than 0.06) and total work (p less than 0.03) compared with placebo plus propranolol therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Dilevalol is a new antihypertensive agent that is both a vasodilator, through its beta 2-agonist action, and a nonselective beta antagonist. Two multicenter, double-blind studies were performed: study 1 compared dilevalol administered once-daily with either dilevalol or propranolol every 12 hours; study 2 compared dilevalol administered once daily with placebo. Both studies had a placebo run-in period to establish that the baseline supine diastolic blood pressures were consistent in the mild to moderate severity range (95 to 115 mm Hg) at 2 consecutive visits for study 1 and in the mild severity range (95 to 105 mm Hg) in study 2. Patients then were randomized to the double-blind titration phase, during which doses were titrated over a 9-week period to achieve a supine diastolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg and a decrease from baseline of greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg. Patients were then maintained on a fixed dose for 2 months (study 1) or for 1 month (study 2). Dilevalol given once daily was as effective in reducing supine diastolic blood pressure as dilevalol every 12 hours and propranolol every 12 hours (study 1) and was superior to placebo (p less than 0.001) (study 2). In both studies, dilevalol given once daily was effective and well tolerated. The side-effect profile of dilevalol was similar to that of placebo and different from that of propranolol. Treatment with dilevalol resulted in significantly less fatigue (p less than 0.05), bradycardia (less than 50 beats/minute) and mental depression than with propranolol, but significantly (p less than 0.05) more diarrhea/loose stools.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The refractory periods of the atrioventricular (AV) node appear dependent on the pattern of AV nodal input. In 21 superfused AV rabbit heart preparations stimulated from each of the 2 principal input regions, crista terminalis or atrial septum, the effect of changing the site of stimulation of the AV nodal refractoriness and the relative effect of verapamil on AV nodal refractoriness was determined. In 6 of 21 preparations the functional AV refractory curve became discontinuous only when stimulation was applied at the atrial septum and suggested dual AV nodal pathways (dual pathways group). In the 15 other preparations no interruption of the curve occurred with either crista terminalis or atrial septal stimulation (normal conduction group). In the normal conduction group, the difference in the effective refractory period of the AV node obtained by crista terminalis vs atrial septal stimulation was not significant (154 +/- 25 vs 150 +/- 28 ms). However, the functional refractory period was significantly longer with crista terminalis vs atrial septal stimulation (232 +/- 19 vs 239 +/- 19 ms, p less than 0.001). After verapamil administration, the effective and functional refractory periods during crista terminalis vs atrial septal stimulation were prolonged to 270 +/- 49 vs 285 +/- 55 ms (p less than 0.01) and 335 +/- 43 vs 351 +/- 41 ms (p less than 0.001), respectively. Thus, the difference in refractory periods associated with changing the stimulation site was exaggerated with verapamil.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The effects of esmolol, an ultrashort-acting beta blocker, and verapamil were compared in controlling ventricular response in 45 patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, in a randomized, parallel, open-label study. Patients with either new onset (less than 48 hours, n = 31) or old onset (greater than 48 hours, n = 14) of atrial fibrillation or flutter with rapid ventricular rate were stratified to receive esmolol (n = 21) or verapamil (n = 24). Drug efficacy was measured by ventricular rate reduction and conversion to sinus rhythm. The heart rate declined with esmolol from 139 to 100 beats/min (p less than 0.001) and with verapamil from 142 to 97 beats/min (p less than 0.001). Fifty percent of esmolol-treated patients with new onset of arrhythmias converted to sinus rhythm, whereas only 12% of those who received verapamil converted (p less than 0.03). Mild hypotension was observed in both treatment groups. Esmolol compares favorably with verapamil with respect to both efficacy and safety in acutely decreasing ventricular response during atrial fibrillation or flutter. Moreover, conversion to sinus rhythm is significantly more likely with esmolol.

The components of the reentrant circuit were evaluated in 26 patients in whom sustained ventricular tachycardia could be reproducibly initiated or terminated, or both. Observations suggesting that the proximal His-Purkinje system was not a requisite component included (1) lack of requirement for retrograde His-Purkinje delay or bundle branck reentry, or both, for initiation of the tachycardia: (2) anterograde depolarization of the His bundle during ventricular tachycardial without alteration of the QRS configuration or cycle length; and (3) the presence of random retrograde His potentials during the tachycardia. Evidence that the reentrant circuit was localized to a small area of the ventricles included (1) the ability to capture large segments of the ventricles transiently or continuously with occurrence of intermittent or continuous supraventricular capture either spontaneously or with atrial pacing without effect on the tachycardia. These findings suggest that the reentrant circuit must be small, electrocardiographically silent and relatively protected.

Two hundred patients underogoing coronary bypass graft surgery were studied to determine the frequency and significance fo new fascicular conduction distrubances. The follow-up period ranged from 13 to 39 months. New disturbances developed in 39 patients (20 percent). Isolated right bundle branch block (6 percent) and left anterior hemiblock (6 percent) were the most common disturbances. Righ bundle branch block was usually transient and was not associated with further complications in the follow-up period. However, patients with either transient or persistent left bundle branch block or left anterior hemiblock, or both, had (1) increased later mortality compared with patients without new fascicular conduction disturbances (5 of 26 versus 11 of 161; P less than 0.02), and (2) increased late myocardial infarction (2 of 26 versus 2 of 161; P less than 0.05). New left fascicular conduction disturbances after coronary surgery identified a subset of patients with more extensive ischemic heart disease, suggesting that these patients require close follow-up care.

Polymorphous ventricular tachycardia may occur in the setting of either a normal or a prolonged Q-T interval. Torsade de pointes is a form of polymorphous ventricular tachycardia in which the polarity of the QRS complex exhibits phasic alterations in both axis and rate. Traditionally, torsade de pointes has been described in association with a variety of congenital and acquired (including drug and metabolic) causes of Q-T prolongation. The distinction between torsade de pointes and those polymorphous ventricular tachycardias occurring in patients with a normal Q-T interval has important therapeutic implications. The former requires strict avoidance of all drugs that may potentially further delay repolarization, including class I antiarrhythmic agents; immediately, the initiation of cardiac pacing is often necessary for control of arrhythmia, and on a long-term basis, sympathetic nervous blockade is often efficacious. In contrast, the polymorphous ventricular tachycardias with a normal Q-T interval usually respond to conventional therapy, including administration of class I antiarrhythmic agents. Thus, the management of polymorphous ventricular tachycardia should be based on the presence of absence of associated repolarization rather than on the morphologic features of the tachycardia. Unfortunately, recent advances in basic and clinical electrophysiology have not yet elucidated the pathophysiologic basis for these arrhythmias, although this is an area of active investigative interest.