Search

Sixteen patients with type I atrial flutter underwent an attempt at radiofrequency catheter ablation (8 women, 8 men, mean age 53 +/- 11 years). The primary criterion used to identify sites for radiofrequency energy delivery was the identification of a fractionated electrogram. Radiofrequency energy was delivered for 20 to 30 seconds. Radiofrequency catheter ablation was acutely successful in 13 patients and unsuccessful in 3. During a mean follow-up of 10 +/- 4 months, 9 of 13 patients with a successful acute result (69%) remained free of recurrent atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation. The ability to induce nonclinical types of atrial flutter was associated with an unsuccessful outcome. A greater proportion of electrograms recorded at successful sites demonstrated electrogram stability compared with unsuccessful ablation sites. None of the electrograms recorded at successful ablation sites were fractionated or had a double potential. This study demonstrates that radiofrequency catheter ablation of type I atrial flutter can be achieved safely.

Radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular (AV) junction may be performed using either a right- or left-sided approach. This study prospectively compared the left-sided approach with persistent attempts from the right side in patients in whom initial radiofrequency applications on the right side were unsuccessful. Twenty-one of 54 patients did not have complete AV block induced after 3 right-sided radiofrequency applications. These 21 patients were randomly assigned to undergo either the left-sided approach (n = 10) or to undergo additional attempts from the right side (n = 11). The right-sided approach was performed by positioning the ablation catheter to record the largest possible atrial and His bundle electrograms. The left-sided approach was performed by positioning the ablation catheter along the left ventricular septum, where a His bundle potential was recorded. If either approach was not successful after an additional 17 radiofrequency applications, the alternative approach was then used. The AV junction was successfully ablated in all 10 patients randomized to the left-sided approach, but in only 6 of 11 patients randomized to persistent right-sided attempts (p < 0.05). The 5 patients in whom the AV junction was not successfully ablated using the right-sided approach underwent the left-sided approach and had a successful outcome after a mean of 1.2 +/- 0.4 radiofrequency applications. The left-sided approach required significantly fewer radiofrequency applications after randomization than the right-sided approach (3 +/- 3.4 vs 11 +/- 7.6, p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The results of radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients without structural heart disease are reported. Particular attention was focused on the relation between efficacy and the site of origin of the VT. Eighteen consecutive patients (5 women and 13 men; mean age 41 +/- 13 years) with idiopathic VT underwent catheter ablation using radiofrequency energy. Sites for radiofrequency energy delivery were selected on the basis of pace mapping. A follow-up electrophysiologic test was performed 1 to 3 months after the ablation procedure. Twenty VTs were induced. Radiofrequency catheter ablation was successful in eliminating all 10 VTs originating from the right ventricular outflow tract, and 5 of 10 from other sites in the left or right ventricle. There were no complications. The duration of ablation sessions was shorter, the frequency of identifying a site resulting in an identical pace map was higher, and the efficacy of catheter ablation was greater for VTs originating from the right ventricular outflow tract than for those from other locations. The results of this study demonstrate that radiofrequency catheter ablation of idiopathic VT is safe and effective. The efficacy of the procedure is dependent on the site of origin of the VT, with the efficacy being greater for VTs originating from the outflow tract of the right ventricle than for those from other locations.

Measurement of coronary artery stenosis is an invaluable tool in the study of coronary artery disease. Clinical trials and even day-to-day decision making should ideally be based on accurate and reproducible quantitative methods. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) using digital angiographic techniques has been shown to fulfill these requirements. Yet many laboratories have abandoned visual analysis in favor of the intermediate quantitative approach involving hand-held calipers. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the relation between QCA and the commonly used caliper measurements. Percent stenosis was assessed in 155 lesions using 3 techniques: QCA, caliper measures from a 35-mm cine viewer (cine) and caliper measures from a video display (CRT). Good overall correlation was noted among the 3 different techniques (r greater than or equal to 0.72). Both of the caliper methods underestimated QCA for stenosis greater than or equal to 75% (p less than or equal to 0.001) and overestimated stenosis less than 75% (p less than 0.05). Reproducibility assessed in 52 lesions by independent observers showed QCA to be superior (r = 0.95) to either of the caliper measurements (cine: r = 0.63; CRT: r = 0.73). Therefore, the commonly used caliper method is not an adequate substitute for QCA because overestimation of noncritical stenoses and underestimation of severe stenoses may occur and the measurements have poor reproducibility. These factors definitely preclude its use in rigorous clinical trials. Moreover, since they do not appear to overcome known deficiencies of visual analysis, caliper measurements for day-to-day clinical use must also be seriously questioned.