Search

More evidence is required with respect to the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in contemporary clinical practice. This prospective observational registry-based study compared the outcomes of 6,647 patients with multivessel disease who underwent PCI with second-generation DES (n = 3,858) or CABG (n = 2,789) between January 2006 and June 2018 and for whom follow-up data were available for at least 2 to 13 years (median 4.8). The primary outcome was a composite of death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, or stroke. Baseline differences were adjusted using propensity scores and inverse probability weighting. In the overall cohort, there were no significant between-group differences in the adjusted risks for the primary composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR] for PCI vs CABG 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86 to 1.25, p = 0.73) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.20, p = 0.68). This relative treatment effect on the primary outcome was similar in patients with diabetes (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.46, p = 0.25) and without diabetes (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.22, p = 0.67) (p for interaction = 0.24). The adjusted risk of the primary outcome was significantly greater after PCI than after CABG in patients with left main involvement (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.90, p = 0.044), but not in those without left main involvement (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.16, p = 0.56) (p = 0.03 for interaction). In this prospective real-world long-term registry, we observed that the risk for the primary composite of death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, or stroke was similar between PCI with contemporary DES and CABG., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr. Duk-Woo Park reports grants from Daiichi-Sankyo, ChongKunDang Pharm, and Daewoong Pharm; personal fees from Edwards; grants and personal fees from Abbott Vascular; and personal fees from Medtronic, all outside the submitted work. Dr. Seung-Jung Park reports grants and personal fees from Abbott Vascular; grants from Daiichi-Sankyo, ChongKunDang Pharm, and Daewoong Pharm; and grants and personal fees from Edwards, all outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Gender differences have been recognized in several aspects of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, evidence for gender differences in long-term outcomes after left main coronary artery (LMCA) revascularization is limited. We sought to evaluate the impact of gender on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for unprotected LMCA disease. We evaluated 4,320 patients with LMCA disease who underwent CABG (n = 1,456) or PCI (n = 2,864) from the Interventional Research Incorporation Society-Left MAIN Revascularization registry. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. Among 4,320 patients, 968 (22.4%) were females and 3,352 (77.6%) were males. Compared to males, females were older, had a higher prevalence of hypertension and insulin-requiring diabetes, more frequently presented with acute coronary syndrome, but had less extensive CAD and less frequent left main bifurcation involvement. The adjusted risk for the primary outcome was not different after PCI or CABG in females and males (hazard ratio [HR] 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-1.63 and HR 0.97; 95% CI: 0.80-1.19, respectively); there was no significant interaction between gender and the revascularization strategy (P for interaction = 0.775). In multivariable analysis, gender did not appear to be an independent predictor for the primary outcome. In revascularization for LMCA disease, females and males had a comparable primary composite outcome of death, MI, or stroke with either CABG or PCI without a significant interaction of gender with the revascularization strategy., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immediate improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is common; however, data on the pattern and prognostic value of this improvement are limited. To evaluate the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of immediate improvement in LVEF, we studied 694 consecutive patient who had underwent successful TAVI for severe aortic stenosis (AS) between March 2010 and December 2019. We defined immediate improvement of LVEF as an absolute increase of ≥5% in LVEF at post-procedure echocardiogram. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular event (MACCE), defined as a composite of death from cardiovascular cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or rehospitalization from cardiovascular cause. Among them, 160 patients showed immediate improvement in LVEF. The independent predictors of immediate LVEF improvement were absence of hypertension and baseline significant aortic regurgitation, and greater baseline LV mass index. Immediate improvement in LVEF was significantly associated with a lower risk of MACCE (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.81; p = 0.01). In conclusion, approximately one-fourth of patients with severe AS who underwent TAVI showed immediate improvement in LVEF during index hospitalization. Immediate LVEF recovery was associated with a lower risk of MACCE during follow-up., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)