This randomized study evaluates survivors of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) not associated with a Q-wave acute myocardial infarction who are deemed to be at a high risk of recurrence of VF. it compares the outcome of treatment with empirically administered amiodarone with the outcome of treatment with other antiarrhythmic agents guided by electrophysiologic testing or Holter recording, or both. The goal of therapy guided by electrophysiologic testing is to suppress inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VF. Holter recording is used as the primary means of adjusting therapy only if patients are noninducible at the baseline electrophysiologic study. Patients are stratified according to cardiac diagnosis, ejection fraction, and whether they had previously received an antiarrhythmic agent that failed to suppress their arrhythmias. The primary end point of the study is total cardiac mortality. The first patient was enrolled in a pilot study on April 26, 1984. By October 1988, 142 patients had been enrolled in the full study and, as of May 1990, 199 patients have been enrolled. Compliance with therapy has been good, with no patients lost to follow-up and 8% of patients, equal in both drug groups, crossing over to alternate therapy. Baseline clinical characteristics remain similar in amiodarone and conventional drug groups. Pulmonary toxicity with amiodarone is 7% at 1 year, with no patients dying of pulmonary toxicity. in the first 142 patients, the overall 1-year cardiac mortality was 19%, with a 17% arrhythmic mortality (either VF or presumed arrhythmic death). Because of this relatively high mortality, even with aggressive evaluation, treatment and follow-up, the investigators concluded that all patients who were participants in the study should also have an automatic defibrillator implanted when possible. Enrollment will continue until March 31, 1991, with follow-up for an additional year thereafter. This study should provide data about the relative efficacy of empirically administered amiodarone compared with other antiarrhythmic agents guided by electrophysiologic study and Holter monitoring. (Am J Cardiol 1991;67:578-584), Under normal circumstances, the heart muscle has synchronized, rhythmic contractions while pumping blood to the body. Under a variety of conditions, this contractile pattern is disrupted; the resulting cessation of pumping is known as cardiac arrest, and is fatal if not reversed immediately. Patients who recover from an out-of-hospital episode of cardiac arrest are at high risk for recurrence of this condition. Frequently the episode of cardiac arrest results from an occurrence of ventricular fibrillation (VF; desynchronized, ineffectual contraction of individual heart muscle fibers), and recurrence of VF is common as well. It is assumed, but not proven, that administration of antiarrhythmic drugs will prevent another episode of VF. Because antiarrhythmic medication is almost universally administered to patients following VF, it has not been possible to compare drug therapy with placebo control. Amiodarone is a commonly prescribed, long-acting antiarrhythmic; the high rate of side effects makes it desirable to know if amiodarone is superior to other drugs of this class. To evaluate its usefulness, 199 patients have enrolled to date in the Cardiac Arrest in Seattle: Conventional Versus Amiodarone Drug Evaluation (CASCADE) study after suffering an episode of out-of-hospital VF. The goal of this ongoing study is to assess the outcome of treatment with amiodarone and the outcome of treatment with other antiarrhythmic drugs (conventional therapy). Drug dosages are titrated to prevent either physician-inducible bouts of VF, or in cases where VF can not be experimentally induced, spontaneous bouts of arrythmia as determined by ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. Thus far, baseline clinical data remain similar in amiodarone and conventional therapy groups. Pulmonary toxicity has occurred in about seven percent of the amiodarone patients; no patients have died of this complication. In the first 142 patients, overall one-year cardiac mortality was 19 percent, with 17 percent dying from VF or presumed arrythmia. Because of the high mortality rate even with closely monitored drug therapy, the investigators recommend that all participants in the study have an automatic defibrillator implanted when possible. (Consumer Summary produced by Reliance Medical Information, Inc.)