The diagnosis of unstable angina encompasses a broad spectrum of patients with myocardial ischemia, varying widely in cause, prognosis and responsiveness to therapy. A new clinical classification of unstable angina is based on the following 2 components: severity, and the clinical setting in which unstable angina develops. The hypothesis that this clinical classification correlates with the underlying coronary artery anatomy was tested. In 238 consecutive patients, an unstable angina score ranging from 2 to 6 was determined by adding the scores for severity (1 = unstable angina without pain at rest; 2 = pain at rest >48 hours before angiography; and 3 = pain at rest [less than or equal to]48 hours before angiographic evaluation) and the clinical setting of unstable angina (1 = unstable angina secondary to a noncardiac condition; 2 = primary unstable angina; and 3 = early postinfarction unstable angina). Fifty concurrently studied consecutive patients with stable angina were assigned a score of 0. Patients with unstable angina averaged 63 [+ or -] 11 years of age, and 165 were men (69%). Pain at rest occurred in 202 of 238 patients (85%), and angiography was performed [less than or equal to]48 hours in 139 of these patients (69%). Among patients with unstable angina, S (2%) had secondary unstable angina, 143 (60%) had primary unstable angina, and 90 (38%) had postinfarction unstable angina. Multivariable regression analysis identified the unstable angina score as the most important predictor of intracoronary thrombus (p = 0.011) and lesion complexity (p = 0.004) in the ischemia-related artery. The new clinical classification of unstable angina correlates with the underlying angiographic anatomy, and may thus aid in decisions regarding diagnostic procedures and provide a useful basis for comparing the response to therapy among patients with unstable angina. (Am J Cardiol 1993;72:544-550) The diagnosis of unstable angina is applied to several different conditions, each producing severe myocardial ischemia but manifesting a broad spectrum of severity, clinical presentations, angiographic findings and prognoses. The severity ranges from the abrupt intensification of chronic stable angina, or the onset of severe or frequent exercise-induced angina without pain at rest, to frequent episodes of angina at rest. Angiographic findings in unstable angina vary from an absence of serious coronary arterial obstruction[1-4] to high-grade stenoses sometimes containing nonocclusive thrombi.[2,3,1-8] The results of treatment of unstable angina range from complete resolution to refractory ischemia, myocardial infarction or death.[9-12] To help the clinician in dealing with this complex syndrome, a clinical classification was developed that considers both the severity of the condition (specifically, the occurrence and timing of pain at rest) and the clinical circumstances in which the unstable angina occurs.[13] This classification is being used increasingly in clinical studies.[14-17] The present study tests the hypothesis that this classification correlates with the underlying coronary artery morphology. A secondary aim was to describe the differences in coronary artery morphology between stable and unstable angina. METHODS Unstable angina: From January 1 to July 31, 1990, 1,169 patients underwent diagnostic coronary arteriography at the Brigham and Women's Hospital. Of these patients, 277 (24%) had unstable angina. Thirty-nine of these patients were excluded from this analysis for the following reasons: 11 had angiograms that were not available or suitable for analysis, 8 had prior coronary artery bypass surgery, 4 had charts pertaining to the hospital admission for unstable angina that were not available, and 16 could not be accurately classified from the available hospital records. Complete hospital records and suitable coronary arteriograms were available for 238 of 277 patients (86%). In this classification, the severity of unstable angina is expressed as follows: class 1, no pain at rest; class II, pain at rest with last episode >48 hours; and class III, pain at rest with last episode [less than or equal to]48 hours. The clinical circumstances in which unstable angina develops is expressed as follows: type A, unstable angina secondary to a noncoronary condition such as anemia (secondary unstable angina); type B, primary unstable angina; and type C, early ( Stable angina: Fifty consecutive patients with chronic stable angina who underwent cardiac catheterization during the same time period were also studied. These patients were identified as having had no change in their anginal pattern for [greater than or equal to]3 months before catheterization and by not fulfilling the clinical definition of unstable angina, as defined previously.[13] Most of these patients were referred for angiography because of severe but stable symptoms or a markedly abnormal exercise treadmill test, or were considered for coronary revascularization, or a combination. Coronary angiography: Cardiac catheterization was performed from the brachial or femoral approach using standard catheters and techniques. Coronary arteriograms were reviewed by an experienced angiographer unaware of the patients' clinical classifications. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed in the ischemia-related artery. In patients with 1-vessel disease, the diseased artery was considered the ischemia-related vessel, whereas in those with multivessel disease, a correlation between electrocardiographic changes during angina and coronary anatomy was used to identify the ischemia-related artery.[18] If there were no electrocardiographic changes, the vessel with thrombus was identified as the ischemia-related vessel. If no thrombus was apparent, the ischemia-related artery was determined to be the one containing the most complex stenosis (see later). Quantitative measurements of minimal lesion diameter and percent diameter stenosis were obtained using electronic calipers (Mitutoyo, Tokyo) in magnified, end-diastolic frames. Repeated measurements with the caliper system showed no evidence of bias related to vessel size; intraobserver estimation of stenosis severity (n = 20) showed a coefficient of variation of 10%.[19] Coronary artery flow was classified according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) criteria.[20] The extent of collateral formation was scored according to Rentrop as follows: grade 3, brisk flow that fills the target artery completely; 2, partial filling of the target artery; and 1, barely detectable filling of collateral channels without apparent spillover of contrast into the target artery.[21] Coronary morphology: The complexity of coronary lesions was scored according to a classification modified from that described by Ambrose et al[22]: (1) A simple stenosis was classified as any luminal narrowing with 50% reduction in vessel diameter, causing a symmetric or asymmetric stenosis with smooth or slightly irregular borders (1 point). (2) A complex stenosis was defined as an asymmetric luminal narrowing of 50% reduction in diameter with overhanging edges or irregular borders, including lesion ulceration or severe diffuse irregularities (2 points). (3) Intracoronary thrombus was detected angiographically by an intracoronary filling defect, usually globular in shape, surrounded by contrast on [greater than or equal to]3 sides, proximal or distal to a stenosis with or without contrast staining (3 points). (4) Total occlusion (4 points). Statistical analysis: The unstable angina score was based on the clinical classification previously presented,[13] and was calculated from the added scores for severity (unstable angina without pain at rest [class I] = 1; pain at rest >48 hours before angiography [class II] = 2; and pain at rest within 48 hours [class III] = 3) and clinical circumstances (unstable angina secondary to a medical condition such as anemia [type A] = 1; primary unstable angina [type B] = 2; and unstable angina within 2 weeks of myocardial infarction [type C] = 3). The score for patients with stable angina was by definition 0, whereas that for those with unstable angina ranged from 2 to 6 (Table I). [TABULAR DATA I OMITTED] Baseline comparisons among the groups of patients were obtained with 1-way analysis of variance for continuous variables and with chi-square analysis for categoric variables.[23] Separate analyses were performed to determine whether the unstable angina score was predictive of intracoronary thrombus and lesion complexity. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the correlation between the unstable angina score, age, sex, ST-segment change, diabetes, systemic hypertension, tobacco use or hypercholesterolemia and the presence of intracoronary thrombus. Variables associated with a p value RESULTS Clinical characteristics: Fifteen percent of patients had new onset of severe angina or accelerated angina without pain at rest (i.e., class I in the clinical classification).[13] Pain at rest was reported by 202 of 238 patients (85%) with unstable angina. More than 48 hours had elapsed between the most recent episode of pain at rest and coronary arteriography in 63 patients (class II, 26%) and Of 238 patients with unstable angina, only 5 (2%) had secondary unstable angina (type A). In these 5 patients, chronic stable angina had been intensified by anemia (n = 2), fever (n = 1), new-onset atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response (n = 1), and acute anaphylactic reaction (n = 1). One hundred forty-three patients (60%) had primary unstable angina (type B), and 90 (38%) had early postmyocardial infarction unstable angina (type C). The average age of patients with unstable angina was 63 years; 69% were men. There were no significant differences among the 3 unstable angina classes and types with respect to coronary risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, tobacco use and hypercholesterolemia (Table II). [TABULAR DATA II OMITTED] Of 238 patients with unstable angina, the ischemia-related artery was the left anterior descending coronary artery in 40%, the right in 36%, the circumflex in 17%, and the left main in 3%. This distribution did not differ in patients with stable versus unstable angina, nor was it affected by the class or type of unstable angina, or the unstable angina score (Table III). [TABULAR DATA III OMITTED] Angiographic morphology: Patients with unstable angina had a higher incidence of thrombus (p = 0.01) and complex lesions (p = 0.004) than did those with chronic stable angina. Minimal lesion diameter and percent stenosis showed no differences among patients with the 3 classes and types of unstable angina (Table III). The incidence of intracoronary thrombus varied widely (Figure 1), ranging from 0% in patients with secondary unstable angina (type A) to 20% in those with postinfarction unstable angina (type C). The incidence of intracoronary thrombus was 17% in patients with unstable angina without pain at rest (class I), 13% in those with pain at rest >48 hours before angiographic evaluation (class 11), and 17% in those with pain at rest A lesion with complex morphology, with either evidence of ulceration or an abrupt face to an eccentric lesion,[22] was observed in 12% of patients with stable angina, and in a higher proportion (32%) of all those with unstable angina (p = 0.004) (Table III). With use of the composite score for lesion complexity (Figure 2), we observed that patients with unstable angina had a higher lesion complexity score than did those with stable angina (average 2.1 [+ or -] 1.3 vs 1.8 [+ or -] 1.3; p = 0.011). The probability of discovering thrombus-containing plaques, complex stenoses or total occlusions was high (61 %) for patients with unstable angina scores >3. Left ventricular ejection fraction: Ejection fraction was measured by left ventriculography at the time of cardiac catheterization in 30 of 50 patients with stable angina and in 150 of 238 with unstable angina (Table III). The mean ejection fraction tended to be higher in patients with stable than with unstable angina (68 [+ or -] 11% vs 64 [+ or -] 16%; p = 0.097). The mean ejection fraction did not differ significantly among patients in the 3 classes of unstable angina; however, it was higher in those with unstable angina without recent infarction (type B, 66 [+ or -] 14%) than in those with postinfarction angina (type C, 59 [+ or -] 16%; p = 0.003). Logistic regression analysis for intracoronary thrombus: The unstable angina score was found to be a powerful predictor of intracoronary thrombus by both univariable and multivariable analysis (Figure 3). For each incremental increase in score, the odds of intracoronary thrombus increased by 1.37 (95% confidence interval 1.08, 1.75; p = 0.006). Patients with pain at rest (classes II and III) were more likely to have intracoronary thrombus than were those with no pain at rest (class 1, OR 1.49 [1.04, 2.13]; p = 0.031 by univariable analysis). Increasing age showed an increased odds of intracoronary thrombus (OR 1.05 [1.01, 1.09] per additional year; p = 0.019), but other risk factors were not significantly associated with an increased incidence of intracoronary thrombus by logistic regression analysis. Linear regression analysis for lesion complexity: Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of lesion complexity. The model included continuous variables such as age, percent stenosis, minimal lumen diameter and lesion length, as well as discrete quantitative variables such as TIMI flow grade, extent of collateral formation, and unstable angina score (Table IV). Angiographic variables including minimal lumen diameter and TIMI flow measurements were inversely related to lesion complexity (p DISCUSSION The diagnosis of unstable angina is made in a heterogeneous group of patients with widely varying severities, clinical presentations and angiographic findings. It was the principal objective of this study to determine whether the severity and clinical presentation, as reflected in a recently developed classification[13] and a score derived therefrom, could be used to predict angiographic findings. Most patients referred to our cardiac catheterization laboratory with unstable angina had pain at rest. In particular, patients with pain at rest in the 48 hours before angiography (class III) predominated over those with new onset of severe or accelerated angina on effort without pain at rest (class I), with an intermediate number with pain at rest, but no episode within 48 hours. In regard to presentation, most patients had experienced severe myocardial ischemia in the absence of a noncardiac precipitating event such as fever or anemia (i.e., they had primary unstable angina [type B] or developed unstable angina within 2 weeks of the onset of acute myocardial infarction [type C]). The relatively small proportion of patients with unstable angina precipitated by a noncardiac condition (2%) (i.e., with secondary unstable angina [type A]) should not be interpreted to reflect the infrequency of this type of unstable angina; it probably reflects referral patterns to the cardiac catheterization laboratory. To assess the complexity of the angiographic lesions, we used a modification of the classification by Ambrose et al[22] in which simple stenosis, complex morphology without and with thrombus, and total occlusion are considered as progressively more complex in the spectrum of severity of atherosclerotic plaques. This classification enables standardization and comparison with other studies. However, 1 potential limitation of the present study was the use of angiography to determine the presence of intracoronary thrombus. Although angiographic assessment of thrombus is less sensitive than is angioscopic assessment,[2] the 2 techniques have not been compared in a broad range of patients with unstable angina, such as those in this study. Angioscopic observations in unstable angina have focused on a highly selected group of patients, such as those referred for bypass surgery,[7] and have excluded [greater than or equal to]20% of patients, because of technical difficulties.[8] The reported incidence of intracoronary thrombus varied widely in previous angiographic studies of unstable angina. This variability may be secondary to differences in: (1) the selection of patients, (2) the timing of angiography in regard to the occurrence of pain at rest,[26] and (3) the angiographic criteria for thrombus. In most patients in the present study, angiography was performed within 48 hours of the most recent episode of pain at rest, and a relation between acuity and the incidence of intracoronary thrombus was observed. Various angiographic definitions have been proposed for intracoronary thrombus.[5,22] We used the presence of filling defects that are surrounded by contrast medium on [greater than or equal to]3 sides in nonoccluded vessels. With the use of this rigorous definition, we observed that the probability of intracoronary thrombus ranged from 0 to 22%, depending on the unstable angina score. Previous studies that reported a higher incidence of intracoronary thrombi included some totally occluded vessels as containing thrombi,[2,5,6] whereas others have excluded totally occluded vessels.[4] We included totally occluded vessels in the assessment of lesion complexity, but did not consider such vessels to be thrombus-containing, thereby probably underestimating the incidence of the latter. In this series, the combination of intracoronary thrombus in nonoccluded vessels and total occlusion was found to occur in 32 and 44% of primary (type B) and postinfarction (type C) unstable angina, respectively. These percentages are in good agreement with the range of values reported in recent angiographic studies.[2,3,5,6] We observed that in comparison with a reference group of patients with chronic stable angina, those with unstable angina had a higher frequency of complex lesions and angiographically apparent thrombus. However, the principal finding of this study is that among patients with unstable angina, there was a significant correlation between the clinical findings, as reflected in the clinical classification (and the unstable angina score derived therefrom), and the angiographic findings. Patients with unstable angina considered as a group were more likely than those with chronic, stable angina to have complex, thrombus-associated lesions. The model accounts for only 31% of variability in the lesion complexity, and this suggests that other mechanisms, such as the severity of the underlying stenosis, and the progressive impairment endothelial vasoactive function that occurs with atherosclerosis, may also have a role.[27,28] The probability of discovering thrombus-containing plaques, complex stenoses or total occlusions was low in patients with stable angina or in those with unstable angina whose scores were 2 or 3. Since complications of unstable angina, such as progression to myocardial infarction, and the need for urgent revascularization because of ischemia refractory to medical therapy, are related to the underlying angiographic anatomy,[2] it can be deduced that patients with scores [less than or equal to]3 are less likely to have a complication of unstable angina than are those with higher scores. It would be desirable to evaluate this finding in a prospective study based on a broad cross section of patients with unstable angina rather than limit it to a group referred to a cardiac catheterization laboratory, such as that in the present study. The finding of reduced ejection fractions in patients with higher unstable angina scores is probably due to prior myocardial infarction, and this finding has potentially important prognostic information additive to underlying coronary morphology. Acknowledgment: We are grateful to Elliott Antman, MD, John D. Rutherford, MD, and Thomas J. Ryan, Jr., MD, for critical review of the manuscript. [1.] Bosch X, Theroux P, Waters D, Pelletier GB, Roy D. Early postinfarction ischemia: clinical, angiographic, and prognostic significance. Circulation 1987;75: 988-995. [2.] Williams AE, Freeman MR, Chisholm RJ, Patt NL, Armstrong PW. Angiographic morphology in unstable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1988;62:1024-1027. [3.] Freeman MR, Williams AE, Chisholm RJ, Armstrong PW. Intracoronary thrombus and complex morphology in unstable angina. Relation of timing of angiography arid in-hospital cardiac events. Circulation 1989;80:17-23. [4.] Bugiardini R, Pozzati A, Borghi A, Morgagni GL, Ottani F, Muzi A, Puddu P. Angiographic morphology in unstable angina and its relation to transient myocardial ischemia and hospital outcome. Am J Cardiol 1901;67: [5.] Gotoh K, Mihamino T, Katoh O, Hamano Y, Fukui S, Hori M, Kusuoka H, Mishima M, Inoue M, Kamada T. The role of intracoronary thrombus in unstable angina: angiographic assessment and thrombolytic therapy during ongoing anginal attacks. Circulation 1988;77:526-534. [6.] Rehr R, DiSciascio G, Vetrovec F, Cowley M. Angiographic morphology of coronary artery stenoses in prolonged rest angina: evidence of intracoronary thrombus. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14:1429-1437. [7.] Sherman CT, Litvack F, Grundfest W, Lee M, Hickey A, Chaux A, Kass R, Blanche C, Matloff J, Morgenstern L, Ganz W, Swan HJC, Forrester J. Coronary angioscopy in patients with unstable angina pectoris. N Engl J Med 1986;315: 913-919. [8.] Mizuno K, Satomura K, Miyamoto A, Arakawa K, Shibuya T, Arai T, Kurita A, Nakamura H, Ambrose JA. Angioscopic evaluation of coronary-artery thrombi in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 1992;326:287-291. [9.] Gold HK, Johns JA, Leinbach RC, Yasuda T, Grossbard E, Zusman R, Collen D. A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Circulation 1987;75: 1192-1199. [10.] de Zwaan C, Bar FW, Janssen JHA, de Swart HB, Vermeer F, Wellens HJJ. Effects of thrombolytic therapy on unstable angina: clinical and angiographic results. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12:301-309. [11.] Topol EJ, Nicklas JM, Kander NH, Walton JA, Ellis SG, Gorman L, Pitt B. Coronary revascularization after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for unstable angina pectoris: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Cardiol 1988;62:368-371. [12.] Theroux P, Ouimet H, McCans J, Latour JG, Joly P, Levy G, Pelletier E, Juneau M, Stasiak J, deGuise P, Pelletier G, Rinzler D, Waters D. Aspirin, heparin, or both to treat acute unstable angina. N Engl J Med 1988;319:1105-1111. [13.] Braunwald E. Unstable angina. A classification. Circulation 1989;80:410,AI4. [14.] Seggeweiss H, Fassbender D, Gleichmann U, Mannebach H, Vogt J, Minami K. Perkutane transluminale Koronarangioplastie (PTCA) bei instabiler Angina pectoris: Ergebnisse und Komplikationen unter Beruecksichtigung einer neuen Klassifikation. Z Kardiol 1991;80:423-430. [15.] de Feyter P, Serruys P, Brand M, Hugenholtz P. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for unstable angina. Am J Cardiol 1991;68:125B-135B. [16.] Renkin J, Wijns W, Ladha Z, Col J. Reversal of segmental hypokinesis by coronary angioplasty in patients with unstable angina, persistent T wave inversion, and left anterior descending artery stenosis. Additional evidence for myocardial stunning in humans. Circulation 1990;82:913-921. [17.] Hamm CW, Ravkilde J, Gerhardt W, Jorgensen P, Peheim E, Ljungdahl L, Goldmann B, Katus HA. The prognostic value of serum troponin T in unstable angina. N Engl J Med 1992;327:146-150. [18.] Fuchs RM, Achuff SC, Grunwald L, Yin FC, Griffith LS. Electrocardiographic localization of coronary artery narrowings: studies during myocardial ischemia and infarction in patients with one-vessel disease. Circulation 1982;66:1168-1176. [19.] Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310. [20.] TIMI Study Group. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. TIMI Study Group. N Engl J Med 1985;312:932-936. [21.] Rentrop KP, Cohen M, Blanke H, Phillips RA. Changes in collateral channel filling immediately after controlled coronary artery occlusion by an angioplasty balloon in human subjects. Circulation 1989;80:1166-1175. [22.] Ambrose JA, Winters SL, Stern A, Eng A, Teichholz LE, Gorlin R, Fuster V. Angiographic morphology and the pathogenesis of unstable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5:609-616. [23.] Zar JH. Analysis of Variance. In: Zar JH, ed. Biostatistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984:162-252. [24.] Glantz SA, Slinker BK. Regression with a qualitative dependent variable. In: Glantz SA, Slinker BK, eds. Primer of Applied Regression and Analysis of Variance. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990:512-568. [25.] Zar JH. Multiple regression and correlation. In: Zar JH, ed. Biostatistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984:328-360. [26.] Capone G, Wolf NM, Meyer B, Meister SG. Frequency of intracoronary filling defects by angiography in angina pectoris at rest. Am J Cardiol 1985;56:403-406. [27.] Lassila R, Badimon JJ, Vallabhajosula S, Badimon L. Dynamic monitoring of platelet deposition on severely damaged vessel wall in flowing blood: effects of different stenosis on thrombus growth. Atherosclerosis 1990;10:306-315. [28.] Zeiher AM, Drexler H, Wollschlager H, Just H. Modulation of coronary vasomotor tone in humans: progressive endothelial dysfunction with different early stages of coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation 1991;83:391-401. From the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Manuscript received November 30, 1992; revised manuscript received and accepted May 10, 1993. Address for reprints: John A. Bittl, MD, Brigham and Woman's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.