Search

Combination therapy with benazepril 40 mg and amlodipine 10 mg (B+A) has been shown to be more effective than benazepril 40 mg and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg (B+H) in reducing cardiovascular (CV) events in high-risk patients with stage 2 hypertension with similar blood pressure reductions. In the present post hoc analysis, we evaluated whether B+A is more effective than B+H for reducing CV events in patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) at baseline in a subgroup analysis of the Avoiding Cardiovascular events through COMbination therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) study. The main trial randomized 11,506 patients. Of those, 5,744 received B+A and 5,762 received B+H. Of the 11,506 patients, 5,314 (46%) were classified as having CAD at baseline. The mean patient follow-up period was 35.7 months for the B+A group and 35.6 months for the B+H group. The primary end point was the interval to the first event of composite CV morbidity and mortality. At baseline, significant differences were present between the 5,314 with CAD and the 6,192 without CAD. The patients with CAD had a lower systolic blood pressure and heart rate, a lower incidence of diabetes, and greater incidence of dyslipidemia. However, no baseline differences were found between the randomized B+A and B+H groups. In the patients with CAD, an 18% reduction occurred in the hazard ratio for CV events (primary end point) with B+A versus B+H (p = 0.0016). In a prespecified secondary analysis of the composite end point, including only CV death, myocardial infarction, and stroke, the hazard ratio in the patients with CAD was reduced by 25% (p = 0.0033) in the B+A group compared with the B+H group. B+A was more effective than B+H at comparable blood pressure reductions for reducing CV events in patients, regardless of the presence of CAD. In conclusion, our findings suggest that the combination of B+A should be preferentially used for older patients with high-risk, stage 2 hypertension., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The associations of a history of hypertension with subsequent outcomes after acute myocardial infarction have not been examined in propensity-matched studies. Of the 6,632 patients with acute myocardial infarctions and left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (EPHESUS), 4,407 had histories of hypertension. Propensity scores for a history of hypertension, estimated for each patient using 64 baseline characteristics, were used to match 1,990 pairs of patients with and without hypertension. Matched Cox regression models were used to estimate associations between hypertension and outcomes during a mean of 16 months of follow-up. Heart failure (HF) hospitalization occurred in 11.9% and 8.8% of patients, respectively, with and without hypertension (hazard ratio [HR] for hypertension vs no hypertension 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10 to 1.68, p = 0.004). The association between a history of hypertension and HF hospitalization was significant only in patients without previous HF (n = 3,495, HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.84, p = 0.001), but not in those with previous HF (n = 485, HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.62, p = 0.688, p for interaction = 0.179). A history of hypertension was not associated with all-cause mortality (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.22, p = 0.790) or cardiovascular hospitalization (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.27, p = 0.339). In conclusion, a history of hypertension was associated with subsequent HF hospitalization after acute myocardial infarction, especially in patients without histories of HF, suggesting that hypertension increased the risk for hospitalization with incident HF but did not affect hospitalization for worsening HF symptoms in those with prevalent HF.

Angiotensin receptor blockers have been hypothesized to have synergistic effects with statins. We evaluated the effects of valsartan alone or combined with simvastatin on blood pressure (BP) and indexes of inflammation and oxidant stress in hypertensive patients with hyperlipidemia. In this double-blind trial, 404 patients were randomized to 12 weeks valsartan 160 mg (V) or valsartan 160 mg plus simvastatin 20 mg (V/S20) or 80 mg (V/S80). Twenty-four-hour mean ambulatory BP and biochemical marker measurements were recorded at baseline and study end. There were no statistically significant between-treatment differences for least-square mean reductions from baseline in systolic BP (V, -9.22; V/S20, -9.25; V/S80, -9.58 mm Hg; p <0.0001 for all within-treatment changes vs baseline). Plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein decreased with the combinations but not with V alone (least-square mean median change from baseline, -0.16, -0.20, -0.70 mg/L; p = 0.0001 for V/S80 vs baseline; p = 0.045 for V/S20 vs baseline; p = 0.0023 for V/S80 vs V/S20; p = 0.0045 for V/S80 vs V). Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 was reduced by V, with no evidence for additional lowering with V/S combinations. In conclusion, addition of simvastatin to valsartan did not incrementally lower BP. However, V/S80 was superior to V and V/S20 in reducing high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

The article focuses on a study on impact of angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARBs) on hypertension and heart failure treatment. Topics discussed include angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors' impact on renin-angiotensin system, angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptors activation by ARBs, bradykinin degradation regulated by angiotensin II and ARBs, blood pressure-lowering effect associated with ARBs and the ACE inhibitor Enalapril and angiotensin II effect blocked by the AT1 receptor.