Search

In a multiethnic cohort of 388 patients admitted with symptomatic peripheral artery disease, atrial fibrillation was associated with emergency admission and increased mortality. Despite a greater prevalence of hypertension and diabetes in Afro-Caribbeans and diabetes in Indo-Asians, no significant differences were found in atrial fibrillation prevalence or mortality among different ethnic groups. Patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease and atrial fibrillation should be regarded as “high risk” and managed with optimal medical therapy, including appropriate thromboprophylaxis and close follow-up. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We report a double-blind, multicenter, multinational, placebo-controlled, and well-controlled trial to prove that the sustained-release (SR) formulation of propafenone is superior to placebo in preventing symptoms of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). A total of 594 patients were enrolled in the qualifying period of the study and 293 patients were randomized at 53 centers. There were significant increases in the arrhythmia-free periods from day 5 of randomization to the first recurrence of symptomatic atrial arrhythmia in the propafenone SR 325 mg twice daily (p = 0.004) and propafenone SR 425 mg twice daily (p = 0.003) treatment groups compared with placebo. The median arrhythmia-free time was 9 days in the placebo group, 35 days in the propafenone SR 325 mg twice daily group, and 44 days in the propafenone SR 425 mg twice daily group. There was a significant reduction in average heart rate during the first recurrence of symptomatic arrhythmia after day 5 in the low-dose propafenone group compared with placebo. The median treatment failure time from day 5 (arrhythmia recurrence, adverse events, and withdrawals) was prolonged from 8 days in the placebo group to 19 days in the propafenone SR 325 mg twice daily group (p = 0.002) and to 24 days in the propafenone SR 425 mg twice daily group (p = 0.006). The percentage of patients with ≥1 serious adverse event was similar in the propafenone SR treatment groups (propafenone SR 325 mg twice daily, 10.0%; propafenone SR 425 mg twice daily, 11.2%) but lower in the placebo group (1.1%). In conclusion, the SR formulation of propafenone is superior to placebo, well-tolerated, and prevents symptoms of paroxysmal AF. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We sought to assess the performance of existing bleeding risk scores, such as the Hypertension, Abnormal Renal/Liver Function, Stroke, Bleeding History or Predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/Alcohol Concomitantly (HAS-BLED) score or the Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index (OBRI), in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in sinus rhythm (SR) treated with warfarin or aspirin. We calculated HAS-BLED and OBRI risk scores for 2,305 patients with HFrEF in SR enrolled in the Warfarin versus Aspirin in Reduced Cardiac Ejection Fraction trial. Proportional hazards models were used to test whether each score predicted major bleeding, and comparison of different risk scores was performed using Harell C-statistic and net reclassification improvement index. For the warfarin arm, both scores predicted bleeding risk, with OBRI having significantly greater C-statistic (0.72 vs 0.61; p = 0.03) compared to HAS-BLED, although the net reclassification improvement for comparing OBRI to HAS-BLED was not significant (0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.18 to 0.37). Performance of the OBRI and HAS-BLED risk scores was similar for the aspirin arm. For participants with OBRI scores of 0 to 1, warfarin compared with aspirin reduced ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.98, p = 0.042) without significantly increasing major bleeding (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.30, p = 0.51). For those with OBRI score of =2, there was a trend for reduced ischemic stroke with warfarin compared to aspirin (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.15, p = 0.12), but major bleeding was increased (HR 4.04, 95% CI 1.99 to 8.22, p <0.001). In conclusion, existing bleeding risk scores can identify bleeding risk in patients with HFrEF in SR and could be tested for potentially identifying patients with a favorable risk/benefit profile for antithrombotic therapy with warfarin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the co existence of Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure in a patient because of several risk factors including hypertension, increasing age and valvular heart disease. Topics discussed include use of a 2-dimensional echocardiogram, role of heart failure in impacting anticoagulation of blood in patients and heart failure can prove to be fatal in therapeutic treatment.

The hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function, stroke, bleeding history or predisposition, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, and drugs/alcohol (HAS-BLED); anticoagulation and risk factors in atrial fibrillation (ATRIA); modified Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index (mOBRI); and reduction of atherothrombosis for continued health (REACH) schemes are validated bleeding risk-prediction tools, but their predictive performance in patients with AF receiving multiple antithrombotic drugs after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. We sought to compare the predictive performance of bleeding risk-estimation tools in a cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing PCI. Management of patients with AF undergoing coronary artery stenting is a multicenter European prospective registry enrolling patients with AF undergoing PCI. We calculated HAS-BLED, ATRIA, mOBRI, and REACH bleeding risk-prediction scores and assessed the rate of bleeding complications as defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium at 12 months follow-up in 929 consecutive patients undergoing PCI. Increasing age, femoral access site, and previous peptic ulcer were independent determinants of bleeding. Low bleeding risk scores as determined by HAS-BLED 0 to 2, ATRIA 0 to 3, mOBRI 0, and REACH 0 to 10 were detected in 23.7%, 73.0%, 7.8%, and 5.7% of patients of the cohort, respectively. No significant differences were detected in the rates of any bleeding or major bleeding events for low versus intermediate/high scores with each risk-prediction tool. In conclusion, the performance of ATRIA, HAS-BLED, mOBRI, and REACH scores in predicting bleeding complications in this high-risk patient subset was useless. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Thrombocytopenia is often regarded as a risk factor for bleeding complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The risk of mild to moderate baseline and acquired thrombocytopenia on bleeding and thrombotic or thromboembolic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulation therapy undergoing PCI, however, remains largely unknown. Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation undergoing Coronary Artery Stenting is a multicenter European prospective registry enrolling patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI. We assessed the rate of bleeding complications as defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium and a composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) including all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack or stroke, stent thrombosis, systemic arterial embolism, or revascularization; and a composite of any harmful event (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium and MACCE) at 12-month follow-up in 861 consecutive patients undergoing PCI. Patients were divided into those with mild to moderate baseline thrombocytopenia (platelet count <150 × 109/L; n = 99) and control group (platelet count >150 × 109/L; n = 762). At hospital discharge, thrombocytopenia had no effect on prescribed antithrombotic treatment, and triple therapy (vitamin K antagonist + aspirin + clopidogrel) was the most common combination in both patient groups (69% vs 73%, p = 0.40). No differences in all-cause mortality (12% vs 11%, p = 0.79), MACCE (23% vs 22%, p = 0.87), or bleeding complications (23% vs 19%, p = 0.26) were detected. Acquired in-hospital thrombocytopenia occurred in 9.7% of patients, and it was associated with similar risk of adverse outcomes compared with control group. In conclusion, mild to moderate baseline thrombocytopenia does not seem to have a clinically significant effect on bleeding or thrombotic or thromboembolic complications after PCI in these frail patients receiving multiple antithrombotic drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Renal dysfunction is highly prevalent among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and confers an increased risk of thrombotic and bleeding complications. We evaluated the effect of renal function on prognosis in anticoagulated patients with AF and assessed the changes in renal function during a long-term follow-up period. We recruited 978 consecutive stable anti-coagulated patients with AF from our outpatient anticoagulation clinic (international normalized ratio 2.0 to 3.0 within the previous 6 months). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation at inclusion and 2 years of follow-up. Adverse events were recorded during follow-up (throm-botic/vascular events, major bleeding episodes, and mortality). Longitudinal changes in renal function were analyzed in 886 patients (90.6%). At baseline, the median eGFR using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation was 70.24 ml/min/1.73 m2 (interquartile range 46.79 to 72.52). During follow-up, a low eGFR was associated with thrombotic/vascular events, with every 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 eGFR decrease (hazard ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11 to 1.83, p = 0.006), bleeding (hazard ratio 1.44, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.94, p = 0.015), and mortality (hazard ratio 1.47, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.91, p = 0.004). After excluding patients with a baseline eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2, the mean eGFR in our cohort decreased >10 ml/min/1.73 m2 in 181 patients (21%) during the follow-up period. The variables asso-ciated with severe renal impairment during follow-up were heart failure (odds ratio 3.58,95% CI 1.36 to 9.42, p = 0.010), basal eGFR (odds ratio 6.34,95% CI 2.44 to 16.50, p <0.001), and CHADS2 (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age >75 years, Diabetes mellitus, and previous Stroke or transient ischemic attack [doubled]) score (odds ratio 1.63, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.23, p = 0.003). In conclusion, the presence of impaired renal function was closely related to thrombotic/vascular events, bleeding, and mortality in anticoagulated patients with AF. During follow-up, 1/5 of the patients had significant impairment in renal function. Impor-tantly, normal or mild renal dysfunction at baseline did not exclude the subsequent devel-opment of severe renal dysfunction during the follow-up period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Excessive atrial fibrosis is involved in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF), but little is known of left ventricular (LV) fibrotic status in patients with AF. In the present study, we investigated the presence of abnormal LV fibrosis in AF, its effect on cardiac function, a possible association with arterial stiffness (i.e., systemic cardiovascular fibrosis), and the parameters of endothelial activation, dysfunction, and damage. We also studied whether LV fibrosis could be linked to the future risk of AF onset. In a cross-sectional study, the severity of LV fibrosis was assessed by echocardiographic acoustic densitometry in patients with permanent AF (n [ 49), patients with paroxysmal AF (n [ 44), AF-free "disease controls" (n [ 42) and "healthy controls" (n [ 48). Arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity), plasma markers of endothelial activation (E-selectin), endothelial damage/dysfunction (von Willebrand factors), and microvascular endothelial function (laser Doppler flowmetry) were quantified. In a longitudinal study, 93 patients with pacemakers (22 with AF) were followed up for ‡1 year to assess the predictive value of LV fibrosis for the development of new-onset AF. More severe LV fibrosis was present in both paroxysmal and permanent AF than in the AF-free controls (p <0.001), with more LV fibrosis in permanent than in paroxysmal AF (p [ 0.002). The severity of LV fibrosis in AF wais independently associated with diastolic dysfunction (p [ 0.03), but not with LV contractility, arterial stiffness, or endothelial damage/dysfunction. In conclusion, LV fibrosis might contribute to LV diastolic dysfunction and the high prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in subjects with AF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Warfarin decreases risk of stroke for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) dependent on percent time in the therapeutic range (TTR) with an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2 to 3. We hypothesized that gender differences in ischemic stroke risk are related to TTR. From the AFFIRM database of 4,060 patients with AF, we determined the incidence of ischemic stroke by gender. We evaluated the INR at time of ischemic stroke and calculated TTR. We determined the relation between gender and ischemic stroke by TTR. Women had CHADS2 Scores (3.7 ± 1.3 vs 2.5 ± 1.3, p <0.0001) and more ischemic strokes than men (5% vs 3%, odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 2.26, p = 0.002). Mean INR near time of ischemic stroke was 2 for women and men; median values were subtherapeutic (1.7 and 1.8, respectively). Women spent more time outside the therapeutic range (40 ± 0.7% vs 37 ± 0.5%, p = 0.0001), with more time below the therapeutic range (29 ± 0.7% vs 26 ± 0.5%, p = 0.0002). A higher TTR protected against ischemic stroke for women but not for men. Women who had a comparably high TTR (=66%) still had more ischemic strokes (p = 0.009). A fitted Cox proportional hazard regression model showed that gender, TTR <46% versus >80%, age, and previous stroke were significantly related to stroke incidence. In conclusion, women in AFFIRM were at greater risk of ischemic stroke than men, in part related to differences in TTR. Women with AF may benefit from more aggressive or novel anticoagulation to decrease their risk of stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Increasing evidence points toward a prothrombotic state in hypertension and atherosclerosis, conditions associated with thrombosis-related complications, such as myocardial infarction and stroke. We hypothesized that this increased risk of thrombogenesis may be related to endothelial damage/dysfunction and abnormal angiogenesis, and thus, an increased risk of future cardiovascular disease. Thrombogenesis, endothelial damage/dysfunction, and angiogenesis can be assessed by measurement of tissue factor (TF), von Willebrand Factor (vWF), flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), respectively. To test this hypothesis, we measured TF, vWF, FMD, and VEGF in 76 patients with systemic hypertension (71 men; mean age 64; mean blood pressure 167/72 mm Hg), considered additional risk factors such as diabetes, and related them to the patient's 10-year cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk score using the Framingham equation. Patients were compared with 48 healthy normotensive controls. In these patients, the effects of 6 months of intensified blood pressure and (where appropriate) lipid-lowering treatment were investigated. In our patients, TF, VEGF, and vWF levels were higher, but FMD was lower (all p <0.001) compared with the controls. All markers correlated with each other and with both cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk scores (all p <0.001). After intensified blood pressure and hypercholesterolemia treatment, total cholesterol, blood pressure, TF, VEGF, and vWF levels all decreased, whereas FMD increased (all p <0.001). Thus, in subjects with hypertension and other risk factors, endothelial damage/dysfunction (and thus, atherogenesis), thrombogenesis, and angiogenesis are abnormal, correlate with overall cardiovascular risk, and importantly, can be related to each other in a "Birmingham Vascular Triangle." Furthermore, these processes are beneficially affected by intensive blood pressure and lipid treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report a double-blind, multicenter, multinational, placebo-controlled, and well-controlled trial to prove that the sustained-release (SR) formulation of propafenone is superior to placebo in preventing symptoms of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). A total of 594 patients were enrolled in the qualifying period of the study and 293 patients were randomized at 53 centers. There were significant increases in the arrhythmia-free periods from day 5 of randomization to the first recurrence of symptomatic atrial arrhythmia in the propafenone SR 325 mg twice daily (p = 0.004) and propafenone SR 425 mg twice daily (p = 0.003) treatment groups compared with placebo. The median arrhythmia-free time was 9 days in the placebo group, 35 days in the propafenone SR 325 mg twice daily group, and 44 days in the propafenone SR 425 mg twice daily group. There was a significant reduction in average heart rate during the first recurrence of symptomatic arrhythmia after day 5 in the low-dose propafenone group compared with placebo. The median treatment failure time from day 5 (arrhythmia recurrence, adverse events, and withdrawals) was prolonged from 8 days in the placebo group to 19 days in the propafenone SR 325 mg twice daily group (p = 0.002) and to 24 days in the propafenone SR 425 mg twice daily group (p = 0.006). The percentage of patients with >/=1 serious adverse event was similar in the propafenone SR treatment groups (propafenone SR 325 mg twice daily, 10.0%; propafenone SR 425 mg twice daily, 11.2%) but lower in the placebo group (1.1%). In conclusion, the SR formulation of propafenone is superior to placebo, well-tolerated, and prevents symptoms of paroxysmal AF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]