Search

This article is a report of work carried out during visits to Australia, Britain, Norway, and Russia for the purpose of becoming acquainted with the various processes of setting occupational exposure standards in those countries. The article reviews the processes by which occupational exposure standards are developed from country to country, examines the role of the occupational hygiene discipline in their development and implementation, and reflects on the complex philosophical and practical issues that surround them and the prospects for international harmonization.

In preparation for filter efficiency tests and sampler comparison studies, methods of biological aerosol generation, sampling, and filter recovery were modified from previous studies. Methods described include (1) techniques for generating aerosols that reduced nuisance particles to negligible levels and increased the cell culturability of Mycobacterium abscessus by 30%, (2) sampling techniques that lowered the detectable range of biological particle size from 0.65 to 0.45 micron and reduced the sampling flow from the chamber from 28.3 to 1.5 L/min, and (3) development of methods to remove culturable organisms from respirator filter media. These methods were developed for filter challenge tests with M. abscessus and were applied to two other bacteria. They may also have application to a wider variety of organisms and bioaerosol assessments.

Personal cascade impactors are widely used in occupational aerosol exposure assessment. Appropriate algorithms must be used to determine the total particle size distribution from masses collected on the stages of the cascade impactor. Such algorithms should be regarded as integral components of the measurement system. When evaluating algorithms for reconstruction of size distributions from cascade impactor data, the eventual use of the size distribution must be considered. So, from an industrial hygiene perspective, an appropriate basis for comparison of given measurement systems is the accurate retrieval of the inhalable, thoracic, and respirable aerosol fractions as described by the new, internationally accepted, particle size-selective sampling conventions (which are expected to form the basis of future aerosol standards). This article compares two inversion routines in terms of their abilities to retrieve these aerosol mass fractions relative to the masses that would have been obtained using an ideal sampler that perfectly followed the sampling convention. The routines were used to invert measurements made with the Institute of Occupational Medicine personal inhalable dust spectrometer, a miniature cascade impactor that aspirates the inhalable aerosol fraction, and the results are presented graphically as contours of equal mass bias. The simplest algorithm, based on the a priori assumption of lognormality, appears to provide the best results.

Several recent studies have compared worker personal aerosol exposures as measured by the current method with those obtained by a new approach based on collecting the inhalable fraction, intended to represent all the particles that are capable of entering through the nose and/or mouth during breathing. The present study investigated this relationship for a metal machining facility where aerosols were generated from severely refined, nonaqueous ("straight") cutting oils used during the lathe working of metal rod stock. Workers (n = 23) wore two personal aerosol samplers simulataneously, one of the 37-mm type (for "total" aerosol exposure, E37) and the other of the Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM) type (for inhalable aerosol exposure, EIOM). The data were analyzed by weighted least squares linear regression to determine the coefficient S in the relation EIOM = S.E37. It was found that S = 2.96 +/- 0.60. This ratio-in which exposure to inhalable aerosol was greater than to "total" aerosol-is consistent with previous observations in other industries. The relative coarsenss of the oil mist aerosol, as estimated by cascade impactor measurements, probably explains the difference between the sampling methods. The collection of large "splash" droplets, may also contribute. Future occupational aerosol standards for metalworking fluids will be based on the new, health-related criteria, and exposures will be assessed on the basis of the inhalable fraction. Results of studies like that described here will enable assessment of the impact on future workplace aerosol exposure assessments of introducing new standards.

It has been proposed that future occupational aerosol exposure standards be based on particle size-selective sampling criteria that more accurately reflect worker exposure. In relation to methods currently used for determining individual workers' lead exposures, the widely used 37-mm, closed-face, plastic sampling cassette is known from laboratory wind tunnel studies to undersample significantly compared with estimations of aerosol actually inhaled, especially for large particles. The present study investigated the degree to which this is borne out in field sampling by using side-by-side sampling in selected work sites in a primary lead smelter. Exposures to "total" airborne lead and cadmium as measured using the 37-mm sampler (E37) were compared with exposure measurements using the institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM) personal inhalable aerosol sampler (EIOM). There were 166 good sample pairs for lead and 55 for cadmium. The ratio (reflecting the fractional undersampling of the 37-mm sampler, as represented by the ratio EIOM/E37) was consistently greater than unity, by factors obtained by regression analysis ranging (for different parts of the plant) from 1.39 to 2.14 for lead and 1.29 to 2.12 for cadmium. The factor tended to be greater for parts of the plant characterized by coarser aerosol, consistent with the physical sampling characteristics of the two instruments. This research is important (1) in assessing the impact of implementation of new standards for lead- and cadmium-containing aerosols in the primary lead production industry, and (2) in the development of new occupational exposure limits based on the inhalable aerosol fraction.

The performances of new "total" aerosol samplers for use in workplaces are required to match the inhalability criteria as contained in the latest recommendations of the International Standards Organization (ISO) and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). In the past, practical evaluations have been carried out under idealized conditions in wind tunnels, and there is now the need to extend these to more realistic workplace conditions. This paper describes a new test system that was designed and built for this purpose. It consisted of a life-size mannequin mounted on a trolley so that it can be taken to and wheeled around in workplaces. The mannequin itself incorporated a robotic arm so that, under joystick control, it can be made to simulate a range of worker movements, orientations, and attitudes. An electronically controlled, compact breathing machine provided a range of typical breathing parameters for the mannequin. The pump also provided air movement for a number of personal samplers that were mounted on the torso of the mannequin and tested in that position. Sampler performance should be assessed by comparing directly the aerosol collected by the sampler with that inhaled by the mannequin (and collected on filters inside the head).

This paper describes the development and laboratory testing of a new static dust sampler for airborne total dust in workplaces. Particular attention is paid to designing the sampling head and entry consistent with the concept of inspirability which in turn defines a biologically-relevant aspiration efficiency. The sampling head has a small cylindrical body and a transverse entry slot with thin protruding lips forming an integral part of a weighable capsule containing a 37 mm filter which collects all of the sampled dust (without introducing errors due to external particle blow-off or internal wall losses). A battery-powered sampling pump provides both air suction at 3 L/min and rigid mounting for the sampling head. The sampling head is rotated continuously through 360 degrees at approximately 1.5 rpm by a simple electric drive, connected to the stationary pump through a rotating seal. Wind tunnel testing of the instrument showed it to display an entry efficiency very close to the inspirability curve of Vincent and Armbruster (now recommended by the ACGIH Technical Committee on Air Sampling Procedures for defining inspirable particulate matter (IPM] for particles of aerodynamic diameter up to 90 micron and for windspeeds in the range of one to three m/sec.