1. Comparison of the effects of alternate-day aspirin 81 mg and daily aspirin 162 mg on in-hospital cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction: An open-label, controlled, randomized clinical trial
- Author
-
Muneyasu J.S. Saito, Hajime Kataoka, Hiromitsu Tanaka, Hisao Ogawa, Takeshi Motomiya, Yoshiaki Masuda, Hirofumi Yasue, Kinji Ishikawa, Shunichi J.S. Miyazaki, Tetsu J.S. Yamaguchi, and Ryuichi Hattori
- Subjects
Aspirin ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Infarction ,medicine.disease ,law.invention ,Surgery ,Regimen ,Pharmacotherapy ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Anesthesia ,medicine ,Myocardial infarction ,Open label ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Background It has been well-established that aspirin therapy reduces the risk of vascular events in the acute phase of evolving acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the adequate dose of aspirin for AMI has not yet been determined. Methods To compare alternate-day aspirin 81 mg and daily aspirin 162 mg on the effects of in-hospital cardiovascular events after AMI, we performed a multicenter, open-label, controlled, randomized clinical trial. The aspirin regimen was started immediately, with 162 mg on the first and second day, and randomly allocated to alternate-day aspirin 81 mg and 162 mg aspirin daily after the third day and continued in the hospital. Three hundred sixty-five patents with AMI were allocated to alternate-day aspirin 81 mg and 386 patients with AMI to daily aspirin 162 mg. Results The observation period was 29.9 ± 0.6 days. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 treatment groups in age, sex, hours from onset to admission. Killip classification, number of thrombolytic therapies, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and other drugs (nitrates, calcium antagonists, β-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors). There were also no differences between the 2 groups in the incidence of refractory angina to drug therapy, reinfarction, cerebral vascular accidents, and occurrence of side effects. However, cardiac death occurred in 9 patients in the daily aspir n 162 mg group but in none of those in the alternate-day aspir n 81 mg group (P = .0037). On the other hand, fatal cereb-al infarction occurred in 2 patients in the alternate-day 81 mg aspirin group but in none of those in the daily aspirin 162 mg group. Conclusions We conclude that this study, although underpowered to show meaningful differences in outcome, did not show any difference in in-hospital cardiovascular events with alternate-doy aspirin 81 mg compared with daily aspirin 162 mg.
- Published
- 2000
- Full Text
- View/download PDF