1. Automatic measurement of corrected QT interval in Holter recordings: Comparison of its dynamic behavior in patients after myocardial infarction with and without life-threatening arrhythmias
- Author
-
Vicens Martí, Antonio Bayés de Luna, Xavier Viñolas, Eduard Homs, Josep Guindo, Roberto Elosua, Pablo Laguna, and Pere Caminal
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Myocardial Infarction ,Ventricular tachycardia ,Risk Assessment ,QT interval ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Risk Factors ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,In patient ,cardiovascular diseases ,Myocardial infarction ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Electrocardiography in myocardial infarction ,Arrhythmias, Cardiac ,Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ,Middle Aged ,Prognosis ,medicine.disease ,Death, Sudden, Cardiac ,Case-Control Studies ,Anesthesia ,Ambulatory ,Electrocardiography, Ambulatory ,Tachycardia, Ventricular ,cardiovascular system ,Cardiology ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Complication ,business ,Electrocardiography ,Algorithms - Abstract
This study was designed to determine the value of automatic corrected QT-interval measurement in Holter tapes in patients after myocardial infarction as a marker of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. We compared the corrected QT interval, automatically measured in 24-hour Holter recordings, in two groups of patients after myocardial infarction: group I was composed of 14 patients admitted consecutively to our hospital for documented sustained ventricular tachycardia or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Group II consisted of 28 patients with previous myocardial infarction with characteristics similar to those of group I, but without malignant ventricular arrhythmias in the follow-up. The global mean 24-hour corrected QT interval was longer in group I (425 +/- 20 msec) than in those patients after myocardial infarction without arrhythmias (group II) (405 +/- 17 msec; p0.01). Furthermore, a significant proportion of patients of group I (seven of 14) exhibited more peaks of corrected QT longer than 500 msec compared with patients of group II (two of 28; p0.005). A circadian rhythm of corrected QT peaks was observed in group I, having a significantly higher incidence from 11 PM to 11 AM (p0.05). We conclude that automatic corrected QT-interval measurement on Holter electrocardiogram is now available and feasible. Our results suggest that this is a marker for risk assessment of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Large-scale trials are needed to confirm these results and to determine the predictive value of this technique for risk stratification.
- Published
- 1997