Search

Author(s): Heuer, Hilary W; Wang, P; Rascovsky, K; Wolf, A; Appleby, B; Bove, J; Bordelon, Y; Brannelly, P; Brushaber, DE; Caso, C; Coppola, G; Dickerson, B; Dickinson, S; Domoto-Reilly, K; Faber, K; Ferrall, J; Fields, J; Fishman, A; Fong, J; Foroud, T; Forsberg, LK; Gearhart, D; Ghazanfari, B; Ghoshal, N; Goldman, J; Graff-Radford, J; Graff-Radford, N; Grant, I; Grossman, M; Haley, D; Hsiung, G-Y; Huey, E; Irwin, D; Jones, D; Kantarci, K; Karydas, A; Kaufer, D; Kerwin, D; Knopman, D; Kornak, J; Kramer, JH; Kraft, R; Kremers, WK; Kukull, W; Litvan, I; Ljubenkov, P; Mackenzie, IR; Maldonado, M; Manoochehri, M; McGinnis, S; McKinley, E; Mendez, MF; Miller, BL; Onyike, C; Pantelyat, A; Pearlman, R; Petrucelli, L; Potter, M; Rademakers, R; Ramos, EM; Rankin, KP; Roberson, ED; Rogalski, E; Sengdy, P; Shaw, L; Syrjanen, J; Tartaglia, MC; Tatton, N; Taylor, J; Toga, A; Trojanowski, J; Weintraub, S; Wong, B; Wszolek, Z; Boeve, BF; Rosen, HJ; Boxer, AL; ARTFL and LEFFTDS consortia | Abstract: IntroductionBehavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) may present sporadically or due to an autosomal dominant mutation. Characterization of both forms will improve understanding of the generalizability of assessments and treatments.MethodsA total of 135 sporadic (s-bvFTD; mean age 63.3 years; 34% female) and 99 familial (f-bvFTD; mean age 59.9; 48% female) bvFTD participants were identified. f-bvFTD cases included 43 with known or presumed chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72) gene expansions, 28 with known or presumed microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) mutations, 14 with known progranulin (GRN) mutations, and 14 with a strong family history of FTD but no identified mutation.ResultsParticipants with f-bvFTD were younger and had earlier age at onset. s-bvFTD had higher total Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) scores due to more frequent endorsement of depression and irritability.Discussionf-bvFTD and s-bvFTD cases are clinically similar, suggesting the generalizability of novel biomarkers, therapies, and clinical tools developed in either form to the other.

Introduction Behavior/Comportment/Personality (BEHAV) and Language (LANG) domains were added to the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR®) for improving evaluation of patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) (CDR® plus NACC FTLD). Methods We analyzed the CDR® plus NACC FTLD among participants from the baseline visit of the Advancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration/Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects Consortium. Results The CDR® plus NACC FTLD was able to detect early symptoms in the mildly impaired participants who were rated as CDR® sum of boxes (CDR®-SB) = 0. The CDR®-SB was not sensitive, particularly in participants with mild nonfluent/agrammatic primary progressive aphasia. Participants with familial and sporadic behavioral variant FTD exhibited similar CDR® plus NACC FTLD profiles except that language impairment was more frequent in participants with mild sporadic behavioral variant FTD. Adding the BEHAV and/or LANG domains to the CDR®-SB significantly enhanced discriminatory power in differentiating among the FTLD spectrum disorders. Discussion The BEHAV and LANG domains enable the CDR® plus NACC FTLD to capture early symptomatology of FTLD.

Introduction Some models of therapy for neurodegenerative diseases envision starting treatment before symptoms develop. Demonstrating that such treatments are effective requires accurate knowledge of when symptoms would have started without treatment. Familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration offers a unique opportunity to develop predictors of symptom onset. Methods We created dementia risk scores in 268 familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration family members by entering covariate-adjusted standardized estimates of brain atrophy into a logistic regression to classify asymptomatic versus demented participants. The score's predictive value was tested in a separate group who were followed up longitudinally (stable vs. converted to dementia) using Cox proportional regressions with dementia risk score as the predictor. Results Cross-validated logistic regression achieved good separation of asymptomatic versus demented (accuracy = 90%, SE = 0.06). Atrophy scores predicted conversion from asymptomatic or mildly/questionably symptomatic to dementia (HR = 1.51, 95% CI: [1.16,1.98]). Discussion Individualized quantification of baseline brain atrophy is a promising predictor of progression in asymptomatic familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration mutation carriers.