1. Clinical meaningfulness of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive subscale change in relation to goal attainment in patients on cholinesterase inhibitors
- Author
-
Rachel Schindler, Kenneth Rockwood, Susan E. Howlett, Deborah Hoffman, and Arnold Mitnitski
- Subjects
Male ,Canada ,Epidemiology ,Severity of Illness Index ,behavioral disciplines and activities ,Goal Attainment Scaling ,Odds ,03 medical and health sciences ,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience ,0302 clinical medicine ,Double-Blind Method ,Piperidines ,Developmental Neuroscience ,Alzheimer Disease ,Activities of Daily Living ,Outcome Assessment, Health Care ,mental disorders ,medicine ,Galantamine ,Humans ,Multicenter Studies as Topic ,Dementia ,Donepezil ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Clinical Trials as Topic ,Health Policy ,fungi ,Cognition ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,Clinical trial ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Indans ,Female ,Cholinesterase Inhibitors ,Neurology (clinical) ,Geriatrics and Gerontology ,Cognition Disorders ,Psychology ,Goals ,human activities ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,medicine.drug ,Clinical psychology - Abstract
Introduction The clinical meaningfulness of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) subscale change is disputed. We compared 2- to 4-point ADAS-Cog changes with changes in Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) and everyday function across initial ADAS-Cog scores and treatment responses. Methods This exploratory analysis evaluated mild-moderate Alzheimer's disease patients treated with donepezil (12 months) or galantamine (8 months). Clinical meaningfulness was defined as concomitant ADAS-Cog and GAS changes of ±3 points and/or functional improvement. Results Patients with ≥3-point ADAS-Cog improvement significantly improved on GAS but not on standard tests of everyday function. ADAS-Cog "no change" (≤±3 points) was seen with mean GAS improvement. Initial ADAS-Cog improvement made endpoint improvement (ADAS-Cog 3 points and GAS 1 point) more likely (odds ratio = 6.9; 95% confidence interval=2.5–19.5). In contrast, initial deterioration made endpoint improvement unlikely (0.33; 0.14–0.64). Discussion ADAS-Cog improvement and no change were each associated with GAS improvement. Initial ADAS-Cog worsening was unlikely to result in later improvement. Clinical trial registration number ISRCTN26167328.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF