Search

Biocompatibility testing using in vivo tests is often one of the final evaluations of new dental materials. To reduce the likelihood of failure at this late stage, predictive biocompatibility testing using in vitro methods is needed. In this study, we describe a sensitivity analysis of an oral irritation test by evaluating changes in the viability, using the MTT assay, of 3-D models with EpiOral constructs as a case study. Experiments that tested sources of variability in the assay led to recommendations regarding the storage of the constructs after arrival, pipetting procedure, use of MTT reagents from different vendors, use of transepithelial electrical resistance measurements, and statistical analyses. A statistical model was proposed to evaluate whether test substances yield a positive or negative result and the associated statistical confidence. Testing several test compounds such as the Y-4 polymer, which contains a known irritant, and dentally relevant substances such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at varying concentrations revealed statistically significant results as expected. Lastly, a software app was designed to support a multiwell culture plate layout design. Overall, the findings and suggestions documented here will support the further development and potential standardization of this assay system and may be useful for the development of other assays using 3-D constructs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

New approach methodologies (NAMs) are in vitro, in chemico, and in silico or computational approaches that can potentially be used to reduce animal testing. For NAMs that require laboratory experiments, it is critical that they provide consistent and reliable results. While guidance has been provided on improving the reproducibility of NAMs that require laboratory experiments, there is not yet an overarching technical framework that details how to add measurement quality features into a protocol. In this manuscript, we discuss such a framework and provide a step-by-step process describing how to refine a protocol using basic quality tools. The steps in this framework include 1) conceptual analysis of sources of technical variability in the assay, 2) within-laboratory evaluation of assay performance, 3) statistical data analysis, and 4) determination of method transferability (if needed). While each of these steps has discrete components, they are all inter-related, and insights from any step can influence the others. Following the steps in this framework can help reveal the advantages and limitations of different choices during the design of an assay such as which in-process control measurements to include and how many replicates to use for each control measurement and for each test substance. Overall, the use of this technical framework can support optimizing NAM reproducibility, thereby supporting meeting research and regulatory needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of in vitro assays to inform decision-making requires robust and reproducible results across studies, laboratories, and time. Experiments using positive control materials are an integral component of an assay procedure to demonstrate the extent to which the measurement system is performing as expected. This paper reviews ten characteristics that should be considered when selecting a positive control material for an in vitro assay: 1) the biological mechanism of action, 2) ease of preparation, 3) chemical purity, 4) verifiable physical properties, 5) stability, 6) ability to generate responses spanning the dynamic range of the assay, 7) technical or biological interference, 8) commercial availability, 9) user toxicity, and 10) disposability. Examples and a case study of the monocyte activation test are provided to demonstrate the application of these characteristics for identification and selection of potential positive control materials. Because specific positive control materials are often written into testing standards for in vitro assays, selection of the positive control material based on these characteristics can aid in ensuring the long-term relevance and usability of these standards. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Development of reliable cell-based nanotoxicology assays is important for evaluation of potentially hazardous engineered nanomaterials. Challenges to producing a reliable assay protocol include working with nanoparticle dispersions and living cell lines, and the potential for nano-related interference effects. Here we demonstrate the use of a 96-well plate design with several measurement controls and an interlaboratory comparison study involving five laboratories to characterize the robustness of a nanocytotoxicity MTS cell viability assay based on the A549 cell line. The consensus EC50 values were 22.1 mg/L (95% confidence intervals 16.9 mg/L to 27.2 mg/L) and 52.6 mg/L (44.1 mg/L to 62.6 mg/L) for positively charged polystyrene nanoparticles for the serum-free and serum conditions, respectively, and 49.7 μmol/L (47.5 μmol/L to 51.5 μmol/L) and 77.0 μmol/L (54.3 μmol/L to 99.4 μmol/L) for positive chemical control cadmium sulfate for the serum-free and serum conditions, respectively. Results from the measurement controls can be used to evaluate the sources of variability and their relative magnitudes within and between laboratories. This information revealed steps of the protocol that may need to be modified to improve the overall robustness and precision. The results suggest that protocol details such as cell line ID, media exchange, cell handling, and nanoparticle dispersion are critical to ensure protocol robustness and comparability of nanocytotoxicity assay results. The combination of system control measurements and interlaboratory comparison data yielded insights that would not have been available by either approach by itself. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Development of reliable cell-based nanotoxicology assays is important for evaluation of potentially hazardous engineered nanomaterials. Challenges to producing a reliable assay protocol include working with nanoparticle dispersions and living cell lines, and the potential for nano-related interference effects. Here we demonstrate the use of a 96-well plate design with several measurement controls and an interlaboratory comparison study involving five laboratories to characterize the robustness of a nanocytotoxicity MTS cell viability assay based on the A549 cell line. The consensus EC50 values were 22.1 mg/L (95% confidence intervals 16.9 mg/L to 27.2 mg/L) and 52.6 mg/L (44.1 mg/L to 62.6 mg/L) for positively charged polystyrene nanoparticles for the serum-free and serum conditions, respectively, and 49.7 μmol/L (47.5 μmol/L to 51.5 μmol/L) and 77.0 μmol/L (54.3 μmol/L to 99.4 μmol/L) for positive chemical control cadmium sulfate for the serum-free and serum conditions, respectively. Results from the measurement controls can be used to evaluate the sources of variability and their relative magnitudes within and between laboratories. This information revealed steps of the protocol that may need to be modified to improve the overall robustness and precision. The results suggest that protocol details such as cell line ID, media exchange, cell handling, and nanoparticle dispersion are critical to ensure protocol robustness and comparability of nanocytotoxicity assay results. The combination of system control measurements and interlaboratory comparison data yielded insights that would not have been available by either approach by itself.