Search

Background: The most recognizable phenotype of severe asthma comprises people who are blood eosinophil and FeNO-high, driven by type-2 (T2) cytokine biology which responds to targeted biological therapies. However, in many people with severe asthma, these T2 biomarkers are suppressed but poorly controlled asthma persists. The mechanisms driving asthma in the absence of T2 biology are poorly understood. Objectives: To explore airway pathology in T2 biomarker-high and -low severe asthma. Methods: T2 biomarker-high severe asthma (T2-high, n=17) was compared to biomarker-intermediate (T2-intermediate, n=21) and biomarker-low (T2-low, n=20) severe asthma, and healthy controls (n=28). Bronchoscopy samples were processed for immunohistochemistry, and sputum for cytokines, PGD2 and LTE4 measurements. Results: Tissue eosinophil, neutrophil and mast cell counts were similar across severe asthma phenotypes and not increased when compared to healthy controls. In contrast, the remodeling features of airway smooth muscle mass and MUC5AC expression were increased in all asthma groups compared to health, but similar across asthma subgroups. Submucosal glands were increased in T2-intermediate and T2-low asthma. In spite of similar tissue cellular inflammation, sputum IL-4, IL-5, and CCL26 were increased in T2-high versus T2-low asthma, and several further T2-associated cytokines, PGD2 and LTE4, were increased in T2-high and T2-intermediate asthma compared to healthy controls. Conclusions: Eosinophilic tissue inflammation within proximal airways is suppressed in T2 biomarker-high and T2-low severe asthma, but inflammatory and structural cell activation is present, with sputum T2-associated cytokines highest in T2 biomarker-high patients. Airway remodeling persists, and may be important for residual disease expression beyond eosinophilic exacerbations.

Background Whether the clinical or pathophysiologic significance of the “treatable trait” high blood eosinophil count in COPD is the same as for asthma remains controversial. We sought to determine the relationship between the blood eosinophil count, clinical characteristics and gene expression from bronchial brushings in COPD and asthma. Methods Subjects were recruited into a COPD (emphysema versus airway disease [EvA]) or asthma cohort (Unbiased BIOmarkers in PREDiction of respiratory disease outcomes, U‐BIOPRED). We determined gene expression using RNAseq in EvA (n = 283) and Affymetrix microarrays in U‐BIOPRED (n = 85). We ran linear regression analysis of the bronchial brushings transcriptional signal versus blood eosinophil counts as well as differential expression using a blood eosinophil > 200 cells/μL as a cut‐off. The false discovery rate was controlled at 1% (with continuous values) and 5% (with dichotomized values). Results There were no differences in age, gender, lung function, exercise capacity and quantitative computed tomography between eosinophilic versus noneosinophilic COPD cases. Total serum IgE was increased in eosinophilic asthma and COPD. In EvA, there were 12 genes with a statistically significant positive association with the linear blood eosinophil count, whereas in U‐BIOPRED, 1197 genes showed significant associations (266 positive and 931 negative). The transcriptome showed little overlap between genes and pathways associated with blood eosinophil counts in asthma versus COPD. Only CST1 was common to eosinophilic asthma and COPD and was replicated in independent cohorts. Conclusion Despite shared “treatable traits” between asthma and COPD, the molecular mechanisms underlying these clinical entities are predominately different., In a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) cohort (EvA, n = 283), 12 genes, whereas in asthma cohort (UBIOPRED, n = 85), 1197 genes in bronchial epithelial brushes were correlated with a blood eosinophil count. The gene CST1 was common to eosinophilic asthma and COPD and was replicated in independent cohorts. Despite shared “treatable traits” between asthma and COPD, the molecular mechanisms underlying these clinical entities are predominately different.