Search

Background: Depression has been linked to poorer asthma control in asthmatic patients. Although the Japanese version of the Asthma Control Test (ACT-J) is frequently used as a simple, practical evaluation tool in clinical care settings in Japan, knowledge regarding its efficacy for assessing asthma control in asthmatic patients with depression is limited. Thus, we retrospectively investigated cut-off values of the ACT-J for well- controlled asthma, and explored depression's influence on the test with a questionnaire survey. Methods: Data were analyzed on 1,962 adult asthmatic patients who had completed both the ACT-J and the Japanese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (J-PHQ-9) in 2008 questionnaire survey conducted by the Niigata Asthma Treatment Study Group. Patients were classified into low (LD: J-PHQ-9 score of 0-4) or high depression (HD: J-PHQ-9 score of 5-27) groups. In both groups, the efficacy of the ACT-J was confirmed. We then compared the optimal cut-off points for uncontrolled asthma in both groups by performing a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, using the original classification referred to the GlNA classification as the "true" classification. Results: Cronbach's alpha in the LD and HD group was 0.808 and 0.740 respectively. In both groups, the subgroup with existence of work absenteeism or frequent attacks during the previous 12 months scored lower on the ACT-J. The area under the curve and optimal cut-off point for patients with LD and HD were 0.821 and 0.846, and 23 and 20 respectively. Conclusions: The efficacy of the ACT-J was confirmed in depressive patients with asthma. Because asthma control as evaluated with the ACT-J can be worse than actual control under depressive states, physicians should also pay attention to a patient's depressive state at evaluation. Further investigations focus on the association between the ACT-J and depression are required.

Background: Previous studies show that depression plays an important role in asthma. However, the association between asthma control and severity, and depression is inconclusive. Methods: To investigate the association between asthma control and severity, and depression, we assessed differences in asthma control and asthma severity between groups with various grades of depressive state as defined by the PHQ-9 score using data from the Japanese version of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (J-PHQ-9) and a questionnaire survey including the Asthma Control Test (ACT). Results: The ACT scores in the symptom-screen positive (SP) and major/other depressive disorder (MDD/ ODD) group were significantly lower than those in the symptom-screen negative (SN) and non-MDD/ODD groups, respectively. The rate of step1 and of step 3 and 4 in the SP group were significantly lower and higher than those in the SN group, respectively. When the SP group was divided into three, that is minimal, mild, and more than mild (MTM) depressive state subgroups, the ACT scores in the mild and MTM depressive state subgroups were significantly lower than those in the minimal depressive state subgroup. When the MTM subgroup was divided into moderate, moderate-severe and severe depressive state groups, however, there was no significant variation in ACT score and asthma severity among these three depressive state groups. Conclusions: This study is the first, large-scale investigation of the use of the J-PHQ-9 in asthma patients. Using the J-PHQ-9 and the questionnaire, there was a clear association between asthma control and severity, and depression. As the depression became more severe, the existence of other depression-associated factors unrelated to asthma control and severity might be assumed, although further investigation will be required.