Search

Background: Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Caused by Japanese Cedar Pollinosis (SAR-JCP) is a most common allergic rhinitis, affecting about 40% in Japan, but the influence from SAR-JCP upon asthma is controversial. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of coexistence of SAR-JCP upon control status of asthma using SACRA (Self-Assessment of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Questionnaire). Methods: The design was prospective, single-center, observational study. Asthmatic patients were classified into 3 groups, patients without rhinitis, those with perennial rhinitis or those with SAR-JCP from the results of SACRA. The control status of asthma were evaluated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in SACRA and Asthma Control Test (ACT) score. They were evaluated twice, from September to January (nonpollen-season) and February to April (pollen-season) and compared. Results: 451 patients were enrolled and 325 cases (72%) were diagnosed as having comorbidity of rhinitis, among which 173 with only perennial rhinitis, while 152 with SAR-JCP. There was no significant difference in asthma control level measured by VAS and ACT score among 3 groups during nonpollen-season. The asthma control level measured by VAS (1.91–2.95) and ACT score (22.7–21.6) got worse during pollen-season among patients with SAR-JCP, even though 84% received treatment for rhinitis. Although it differed according to criteria, asthma control during pollen-season was impaired in 18–38% asthmatic patients with SAR-JCP. Conclusion: It is possible to minimize the influence of AR on asthma control by obtaining an accurate diagnosis and providing sufficient treatment for rhinitis.

Background: The clinical usefulness of fixed-dose maintenance therapy with salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC) and budesonide/formoterol combination inhaler (BUD/FM) has been established, though evidence of the long-term anti-inflammatory effects of these 2 inhalers are limited. Methods: Patients with moderate persistent adult asthma who had received SFC 50/250 μg bid with well-control status were recruited. After switching to 8-week therapy with fixed-dose BUD/FM 4 puffs (640/18 μg) (phase-1), patients chose either SFC or BUD/FM. FeNO and ACT score were evaluated every 8 weeks until the end of the 52-week treatment period for both treatment groups (phase-2). Results: In total, 103 patients were examined: BUD/FM was chosen by 34 patients (BUD/FM group), while SFC was chosen by 23 (SFC group). Thirty-six received SFC consistently from the beginning of the study (control). Patients in the BUD/FM and SFC groups showed significant improvements in ACT scores and FeNO levels in phase-1; these beneficial effects persisted for 52 weeks in the BUD/FM group. On the other hand, in the SFC group, although the FeNO level decreased from 54.3 ± 26.4 ppb to 41.9 ± 18.3 ppb in phase-1, it increased to 54.5 ± 26.2 ppb, a level similar to the baseline prior to the beginning of BUD/FM therapy, at 8 weeks in phase-2, and remained at 50-odd ppb thereafter. Conclusions: These results suggest that maintenance therapy with fixed-dose BUD/FM is a useful treatment option exerting an airway anti-inflammatory effect for a period as long as 1 year, even for asthmatics who could not accomplish total control with SFC.

Background: In cases using a budesonide/formoterol combination inhaler, many patients are started on fixed-dose treatment at 640/18 μg (4 puffs) daily, but there are no guidelines yet regarding the step-down method when control has been maintained. Methods: Patients with moderate asthma treated with either budesonide 400 μg and salmeterol 100 μg (GINA step3 group) or salmeterol/fluticasone 250 at 2 puffs (GINA step4 group) were enrolled and started on therapy of budesonide/formoterol 4 puffs. Thereafter, step-down to 2 puffs was performed if either of the following criteria was met at 8-week intervals: fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)≤28 ppb plus asthma control test (ACT) score≥22, or ACT score≥24 at 3 consecutive visits regardless of FeNO level. Thereafter, changes in ACT score, the number of acute exacerbations and reliever use, and FeNO level were monitored through 48th week. Results: Fifty-one patients, 27 in step3 group and 24 in step4 group, underwent step-down. ACT scores and the number of reliever use remained stable in both groups even after step-down. In contrast, FeNO levels increased gradually in step4 group, whereas in the step3 group they increased immediately after step-down. Step-down was considered to be safely performed because the numbers of reliever use and those of moderate or more severe exacerbations during the 48-week period has not changed significantly compared to before step-down. Conclusions: If complete control of asthma, not only of clinical symptoms but also airway inflammation, is achieved by 3-6 months of fixed-dose budesonide/formoterol 4 puffs/day, it should be possible to safely perform step-down to 2 puffs/day.

We report on a case in which five consecutive exacerbations of asthma were monitored by following serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels. The serum ECP level correlated well with each exacerbation and tended to increase even before the exacerbations of asthma became apparent. This case shows that serum levels of ECP can be useful markers of disease activity and may also be predictive markers for acute exacerbation.