Search

The purpose of this article is to assess the performance of a contrast reaction management checklist for optimal management of a contrast reaction scenario created using a high-fidelity hands-on simulation.A safety checklist was designed that presented the five adverse events that most commonly occur after administration of IV contrast medium as well as their step-by-step management. Forty-three radiology residents were randomized into two groups, a checklist group (n = 22) and a control group (n = 21), as stratified by postgraduate year. Participants took written tests involving multiple-choice questions 2 months before and immediately after participating in the high-fidelity simulation scenario, which was videotaped and independently evaluated by three graders.Both groups had similar scores on the multiple-choice question tests taken before and after participation in the simulation (p = 0.35 and p = 0.62, respectively). In the simulation, the checklist group scored significantly higher than the control group with regard to their overall management of a severe contrast reaction (85.1% vs 64.8%; p = 0.001), including individual scores for first-line treatment of bronchospasm (97.0% vs 91.3%; p = 0.035) and use of the correct route of administration and dose of epinephrine (77.3% vs 45.2%; p = 0.021).A standardized contrast reaction management checklist can reduce the number of treatment errors that occur during a simulated severe contrast reaction, particularly with regard to proper administration of epinephrine and treatment of bronchospasm. Such a checklist could be used by radiologists, technologists, and nurses to improve patient safety as a result of improved contrast reaction management and teamwork skills.

OBJECTIVE. Although some research and publication practices are clearly unethical, including fraud and plagiarism, other areas of research and publication, such as informed consent and conflicts of interest, fall into grayer areas. CONCLUSION. The purposes of this article are, therefore, to review a variety of relevant ethical issues in radiology-related journalism, peer review, and research; to review the radiology literature to date that has addressed these issues; and to present position statements and potential solutions to these problems.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to familiarize radiologists with uncommon presentations of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with an emphasis on the CT spectrum of atypical appearances. CONCLUSION. HCC is the fifth most common neoplasm worldwide and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. In many cases, HCC can be confidently diagnosed with noninvasive imaging. However, there are numerous unusual appearances of HCC with which the radiologist must be familiar.

OBJECTIVE. Hepatic malignancy is a common and lethal disease, whether due to a primary tumor or metastasis. There are numerous treatment options available depending on the stage of the disease and medical condition of the patient, including systemic chemotherapy, transcatheter embolization, thermal ablation, and surgical resection. In a subset of patients with liver malignancy, surgical resection can offer the best chance of long-term survival and potentially even cure. This article reviews the major indications and contraindications for resection, basic surgical techniques and terminology, key clinical and imaging preoperative workup, and pertinent interventional oncology procedures in the management of hepatic malignancy. CONCLUSION. Diagnostic and interventional radiology plays an important role in the assessment and treatment of malignant hepatic lesions. Radiologists should be familiar with how surgeons select, work up, and treat candidates for liver resection to provide the most clinically valuable ...

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to review the most common data analysis methods encountered in radiology-based studies. Initially, description of variable types and their corresponding summary measures are provided; subsequent discussion focuses on comparison of these summary measures between groups, with a particular emphasis on regression analysis. CONCLUSION. Knowledge of statistical applications is critical for radiologists to accurately evaluate the current literature and to conduct scientifically rigorous studies. Misapplication of statistical methods can lead to inappropriate conclusions and clinical recommendations.

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively determine whether the ratio of fetal lung-to-liver signal intensities at single-shot fast spin-echo MRI is associated with fetal gestational age.All fetal MRI examinations over a 4-year period were reviewed. All MRI examinations were performed with a 1.5-T magnet for indications other than lung maturity. Only examinations performed with a single-shot fast spin-echo sequence of the fetal chest and abdomen were included in the study. Images from a total of 82 fetal MRI examinations were evaluated. Gestational age ranged from 20 weeks to 39 weeks 3 days. Two board-certified subspecialty-trained radiologists with 11 and 17 years of experience blinded to estimated gestational age (EGA) reviewed the images independently. The regions of interest (ROIs) of the fetal lung and liver were drawn in the same plane and on the same image in each case. Fetal EGA was determined either by first-trimester ultrasound when available or by last menstrual period. Linear regression analysis was used to analyze the relation between the lung-to-liver signal-intensity ratio (LLSIR) in the ROIs and fetal EGA for both readers. The association between the LLSIRs estimated by the two readers was assessed by Bland-Altman plot.Summary statistics for LLSIR showed a median value of 2.29 for reader 1 and 2.21 for reader 2. The mean value for reader 1 was 2.4 and for reader 2 was 2.5. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the LLSIR and EGA variables were 0.44 for reader 1 and 0.45 for reader 2. Linear regression analysis showed a statistically significant association between LLSIR and EGA for both readers (p0.0004). This ratio increased in a linear manner as EGA progressed.Fetal LLSIR at single-shot fast spin-echo MRI is associated with fetal gestational age.

Older legacy bariatric surgical procedures, including jejunocolic bypass, jejunoileal bypass, vertical banded gastroplasty, and biliopancreatic diversion, are no longer performed. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch is still performed in select centers. Although the legacy procedures are no longer performed, there are still patients who have undergone these surgeries in the past who are currently either under continuous surveillance or are being evaluated for surgical conversion or revision because of complications or weight regain. The purpose of this article is to describe the evolutionary development of various bariatric surgical techniques and the associated surgical anatomy. Because these procedures are no longer performed, only limited imaging of legacy bariatric surgeries is available for radiologic demonstration.Although earlier bariatric surgical techniques are no longer favored, there are still patients who underwent these procedures who require imaging evaluation for clinical follow-up or surgical revision. Understanding the radiologic-surgical anatomy of these older bariatric procedures can help in the prompt and appropriate management of these patients.