Search

By contrasting the older 5*5 dipole array antenna with the more recent 2*2 dipole array antenna, this study aims to enhance the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) and thereby investigate the potential radiation health risks to humans. In order to conduct statistical analysis, samples were collected from two groups. Forty samples are provided by two organizations. Unlike Group 1, which used a 5*5 dipole array, Group 2 opted for a 2*2 dipole array antenna. When determining the sample size using G-power 0.8, a 95% confidence interval, an alpha of 0.05, and a beta of 0.2 were all thought about. The antenna works admirably, as shown by a significance level of p<0.05. The Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of a 2*2 dipole array antenna is 0.633 times higher than that of a 5*5 dipole array antenna (0.4188). Because p<0.05, the value of significance is 0.0334. In comparison to a 5*5 dipole array antenna, a 2*2 dipole array produces greater Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) values (0.6338) while investigating the effects of radiation on humans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Examining the effects of radiation on humans, this study contrasts an older 5*5 dipole array antenna with a modern 4*4 antenna that increases the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR). Two sets of samples were used for the statistical analysis. Forty tissue samples were provided by researchers from two separate organizations. Two groups of dipole arrays were employed to build the antennas: one group used 5X5 arrays and the other group used the more modern 4*4 arrays. We use G-power 0.8, an alpha of 0.05, a beta of 0.2, and a 95% confidence interval to estimate the sample size. Antennas are deemed effective when the significance level is lower than 0.05. Consequently, a 4*4 dipole array antenna has a SAR that is 0.4328 times higher than a 5*5 models. A statistically significant influence (p<0.05) was shown by the research, with a p-value of 0.0735. Instead of 5*5 arrays, researchers now employ 4*4 dipole array antennas to monitor Specific Absorption Rates (SARs), which helps them understand radiation's effects on humans better. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study compares the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of a 5*5 dipole array antenna with that of a brand new 3*3 dipole array antenna in an effort to learn how various kinds of dipole array antennas impact live organisms. Approach and Materials: Two groups were sampled for the purpose of statistical analysis. Two different sets of people contributed forty samples. A 5X5 dipole array antenna was used by Group 1, whereas an Innovative 3*3 dipole arrays were employed by Group 2. Researchers used an enhanced body. The forty-person sample consisted of twenty from Group 1 and twenty from Group 2. When utilizing G-power 0.8, the calculations were done using a 95% confidence interval, alpha = 0.05, and beta = 0.2. With an enhanced Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) and a 3*3 dipole array antenna, researchers may analyze radiation impacts on the human body with a sample size of 20. A 5*a 5 dipole array antenna may likewise be effectively used with twenty samples. According to the findings, the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of the 3*3 dipole array antenna is 0.5935% more than that of the 5*5 dipole array antenna, which is 0.4188. The research could be legitimate if the p-value is less than 0.05, which is 0.0300. If you want to know how radiation affects living things, the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) shows that 3*3 dipole array antennas are better than 5*5 dipole arrays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this research work is to design an Innovative Dipole array antenna by utilizing RtDuroid substrate and compare the gain of Dipole array antenna with Rectangular Microstrip patch antenna. For comparative analysis, two groups namely Innovative Dipole Array antenna and Microstrip patch antenna are considered. The total sample size is 20. Pretest power for the samples is 80 %. The gain valves are taken from 3.2 - 4.1 GHz from both the antennas. Results are obtained in the post feko. The gain of dipole array antenna at 4.1GHzis 10.24 dbi and for the rectangular mipcrostrip patch antenna is 7.15 dbi at the same frequency. The statistical significance value is 0.012 (p < 0.05). From all the results obtained it is clear that the Dipole array antenna has higher gain than the Rectangular Microstrip patch antenna for Wireless communication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) study of Radiation Exposure from a Dipole array antenna on spherical muscle tissue is discussed in this article. Materials and methods: The dipole antenna with Two-element and three-element groups is used with 20 samples to analyse SAR. A dielectric called muscle parallel fiber ovine is used as a muscle tissue. Results: By using FEKO Simulation the SAR values are lesser for three element dipole array antennas positioned at distance from muscle fiber. Attained insignificance ratio (0.084) in statistical software. NovelThree-Element dipole array antenna has lesser SAR values in comparison to two element dipole array antenna. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]