1. Short Communication: False Recent Ratio of the Limiting-Antigen Avidity Assay and Viral Load Testing Algorithm Among Cameroonians with Long-Term HIV Infection
- Author
-
Colleen R. Courtney, Issa Eid, Eshan U. Patel, Xiao-Hong Wang, Phillipe N. Nyambi, Ralf Duerr, Andrew D. Redd, Briana A. Lynch, Thomas C. Quinn, Jude S. Bimela, Aubin Nanfack, and Oliver Laeyendecker
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Adult ,Male ,Epidemiology ,030106 microbiology ,Immunology ,HIV Infections ,Biology ,Serology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Antigen ,Virology ,medicine ,Humans ,Avidity ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Cameroon ,Diagnostic Errors ,Aged ,Immunoassay ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Diagnostic Tests, Routine ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Incidence ,Middle Aged ,Viral Load ,Confidence interval ,Chronic infection ,Infectious Diseases ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Female ,Viral load ,Algorithm - Abstract
Current serological assays that are used for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation have been shown to misclassify individuals with chronic infection. Limited information exists on the performance of cross-sectional incidence assays in Central Africa. HIV-positive individuals from Cameroon who were infected for at least 1 or 2 years were evaluated to determine the false recent ratio (FRR) of a two-assay algorithm, which includes the Limiting Antigen Avidity (LAg-Avidity) assay (normalized optical density units, ODn 1000 copies/ml). The subject-level FRR was 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1–10.5) for individuals infected for ≥1 year and 3.9% (95% CI, 0.8–11.0) for individuals infected for ≥2 years. These data suggest that the LAg-Avidity plus viral load incidence algorithm may overestimate HIV incidence rates in Central Africa.
- Published
- 2017