Search

A seroepidemiologic survey was conducted among 773 male soldiers living in five urban locations in Sudan to study the prevalence of and risk factors for HIV-1 and hepatitis B transmission. Twenty-eight per cent of the study population were born and raised in southern Sudan, an area bordering Kenya, Zaire and Uganda, whilst 72% of the study subjects were from northern Sudan. Seventy-eight per cent of the study population had serologic evidence of past hepatitis B infection, and 13 soldiers were confirmed positive for HIV-1 antibody. All 13 HIV-positive soldiers had recently been deployed in southern Sudan. Multivariate analysis indicated an association between living in southern Sudan and both hepatitis B (odds ratio 8.2) and HIV-1 infection (odds ratio 14). Additionally, sexual relations with prostitutes (odds ratio 1.5) and medical injections for schistosomiasis (odds ratio 2.72) were independent predictors of hepatitis B markers in this military population. The findings of this study suggest that sexual promiscuity is a risk factor for hepatitis B transmission in Sudan. They also indicate one possible route for the spread of HIV-1 from central to northern Africa.

Five commercial screening assays for HIV-1, evaluated for their usefulness in detecting infection in high-risk groups in the East African country of Djibouti, produced varying degrees of performance when compared to Western blot and immunofluorescence confirmatory assays. In this population with a low prevalence of HIV infection (16/599), two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA; Abbott and Elavia) and two rapid assays (cambridge latex agglutination and Du Pont's HIV-CHEK) exhibited less than optimal sensitivities. However, with the exception of Elavia, these assays displayed excellent specificities. The fifth test (Serodia gelatin agglutination) produced the highest sensitivity (0.938) and negative predictive value but the lowest specificity and positive predictive value of all five tests. False positive reactions, which occurred only with the Elavia and Serodia tests, could not be explained on the basis of early infection in patients or cross-reactions with the related retroviruses HIV-2 and HTLV-I. We conclude that none of the five tests alone is sufficient in this testing situation, but that a combination of tests could satisfy most requirements for identifying HIV-1 reactive and non-reactive sera.