Search

Background: Since 2015, we prescribed dolutegravir (DTG)-based two drug regimens (DTG-2DR) for 620 people [total cohort 3133 (19.8%)]., Method: Clinic database search 1 January 15 to 31 October 21. Demographic, tolerability and HIV related data analysed., Results: In total, 620 people identified; 561 had complete data. 446 male (79.5%); median age 54 years (interquartile range 46, 59). 343 (61.1%) MSM. Nine people who initiated naïvely achieved viral suppression (100%). 546/552 (99.0%) switched or continued and were suppressed at data censor. 460/552 (83.3%) received DTG-lamivudine (DTG/3TC), 74/552 (13.4%) received DTG-rilpivirine (DTG/RPV) and 18/552 (3.3%) received DTG-emtricitabine (DTG/FTC). 70 (12.5%) switched off DTG-2DR (55 DTG/3TC, 13 DTG/RPV, two DTG/FTC) due to side-effects. 41 episodes of blip (1 off >50 copies/ml) occurred in 30 people (5.3%). 11/41 on DTG-RPV [ n  = 7 multi-tablet regimen (MTR), n  = 4 single tablet regimen (STR)]. 27/41 DTG-3TC, 3/41 DTG/FTC ( n  = 26 MTR, n  = 4 STR). Six people (1.1%) failed (confirmed viral load >200 copies/ml or persistent low level viraemia) ( n  = 4 DTG-3TC STR, n  = 1 DTG-3TC MTR, n  = 1 DTG-RPV MTR). Four failures due to low level viraemia, one due to non-adherence and one due to high viral load. Resistance tests performed for 5/6 - mutations detected only in latter person with high viral load failure (on DTG-3TC MTR) who developed triple class resistance., Conclusion: Majority of experience is in DTG/3TC stable switch. Minority of patients developed side-effects. Low number of virological failures, one developed integrase inhibitor resistance. Viral failure associated with MTR, commensurate with trial data showing no failure with resistance if DTG/3TC STR used. Overall DTG-2DR demonstrates high efficacy in real-world setting., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Renal toxicity in a 73-year-old male, using tenofovir/emtricitabine as preexposure prophylaxis, is described. Reduced renal reserve, a higher exposure to comedications and comorbidities can present a challenge when assessing the risks and benefits of tenofovir-based preexposure prophylaxis in the ageing population.

Abacavir is metabolized primarily by two enzymes: alcohol dehydrogenase and gluconyl transferase. Under normal conditions, alcohol is hepatically cleared via alcohol dehydrogenase to acetaldehyde, and subsequently by acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (ACD) to acetic acid. Disulfiram acts as an ACD blocker. Abacavir may also act as an inhibitor of alcohol dehydrogenase, which raises the possibility of disulfiram-like reactions (if complete inhibition occurs) or reduced alcohol tolerance (if partial inhibition occurs) occurring with abacavir therapy.