Search

Informed consent has historically been a cornerstone to ensuring autonomy during HIV testing. However, recent changes to global guidance on HIV testing have led to substantial debate on what policy provisions are necessary to ensure that consent remains meaningful in the context of testing. Despite disproportionate rates of testing during pregnancy, pregnant women's perspectives on the HIV testing process are underrepresented in the testing discourse. This study explores women's experiences with HIV testing and the consent process in a public antenatal clinic in South Africa. Qualitative interviews with 25 women were conducted at the clinic at either an antenatal visit or an infant immunization visit that followed HIV testing. Interviews were transcribed, translated, and coded for analysis. Women were categorized into one of the three groups based on their perceptions of choice in consenting for an HIV test. Matrices were used to allow for cross-category and cross-case comparison. Half of the women described having a clear choice in their decision to test. Others were less clear about their choice. Some women felt they had no choice in testing for HIV. None of the women stated that they were tested without having signed a consent form. We found that half of the women's narratives illustrated direct and indirect ways in which providers coerced them into taking an HIV test while receiving antenatal care. As the new guidance on HIV testing is implemented in different settings, it is critical to monitor women's testing experiences to ensure that a woman's right to make an informed, voluntary choice is not violated. Furthermore, models of testing that allow us to meet broader public health goals while simultaneously respecting women's autonomy are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

HIV-positive women of reproductive age face challenges in decision making related to pregnancy. Understanding factors influencing repeat pregnancies in women with known HIV status are necessary to guide interventions and counseling strategies to better inform and support them. We compared three groups of women attending a large antenatal clinic in Pune, India. They include: Group A - 63 HIV-positive women comingfor care for a repeat pregnancy after being diagnosed in a previous pregnancy; Group B - 64 HIV-negative (repeat) pregnant women attendingthis antenatal clinic; and Group C - 63 HIV-positive non-pregnant women currently enrolled in an ongoing clinical trial. Comparisons of Group A and B indicate that the likelihood of unplanned repeat pregnancies was significantly higher in HIV-positive (70%) than HIV-negative (36%) women (OR=4.1, CI: 2.0-8.7). Inability to terminate the pregnancy (31%) and familial obligations (40%) appear to be important for continuing the unplanned repeat pregnancy. Despite high reported contraceptive use by HIV-positive women, pregnancies still occurred. Death of their youngest child is an important factor as 21% of HIV-positive pregnant women lost their youngest child compared with 3% of HIV-negative women and 3% of HIV-positive non-pregnant women (p<0.001). Repeat pregnancies were more likely to occur for women who did not disclose their HIV status to their spouse. Thus the majority of the repeat pregnancies for HIV-positive women were both unplanned and unwanted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study reports the results of a cross-sectional questionnaire survey undertaken in the Kassena-Nankana district of Ghana to assess the perception and attitude of 270 antenatal clinic attendants towards voluntary counseling and HIV testing. It was found that although 9 2.6% (95% CI 88.8- 95.4) of respondents indicated a willingness to get tested, only 51% (95% CI 45.0-57.2) considered HIV testing for pregnant women to be useful. Most (9 3.6%) indicated they would like their husbands (partners) to know the result of the test and 5 2.2% indicated that their husbands would be willing to accompany them to antenatal clinic (ANC) at least once during the pregnancy. The perception of the usefulness of HIV testing (OR = 8.5, 95% CI 1.8-40.0), the willingness to disclose test result to the husband (OR =13.3, 95% CI 4.0-44.5) and perceived willingness of husband to accompany wife to antenatal clinic (OR = 5.2, 95% CI 1.4-19.8) were found to be independent predictors of a woman's willingness to get tested. The willingness to disclose test result to husband (OR 3.2, 95% CII. 1- 10.5) and knowledge of at least one mode of MTCT HIV transmission (OR =2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.6) were found to be independent predictors of a woman's perception that getting tested was useful. The results suggest that for pregnant women in this district, the willingness to get tested for HIV does not equate with the perception of the test's usefulness, and that spouses are likely to exert strong influence on the attitude of pregnant women towards VCT. Couple counseling facilitated through couple-friendly ANC services should be explored as strategy for the intended VCT program in this district. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Identification of HIV-infected pregnant women by antenatal screening is crucial to prevent mother-to-child transmission. In Hong Kong, little is known about women's opinions about the screening test. This cross-sectional study examines the decisions of Hong Kong Chinese pregnant women to undergo antenatal HIV screening and the reasons for their choices. Among 191 pregnant women studied, 147 (77.0%) indicated that they would opt for antenatal HIV screening if offered. Of those, 113 (76.9%) would do so for 'the health of their newborns' and 93 (63.3%) for 'their own health'. Fourteen (7.3%) would decline the test, because they have 'one stable sexual partner' ( n =9, 64.3%) and believe that 'HIV infection was not their concern' ( n =8, 57.1%). Women with a lower educational attainment (adjusted OR=3.77; 95% C.I., 1.12-12.67, p =0.03) were likely to choose antenatal HIV screening. Results of this study are predictive of pregnant women's responses to Hong Kong's newly enacted antenatal HIV screening programme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The object of this study was to assess the resource use, feasibility, uptake and consumers' perspective of introducing routine named human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing into an inner city hospital antenatal clinic (St Thomas Hospital, part of Guy's and St Thomas Hospital Trust). Following the introduction of a new service offering routine named HIV testing at booking appointments, the length of the appointments were recorded over a three-month period and compared with appointment lengths in the previously existing service. Women being offered routine named HIV testing were asked to complete a questionnaire before and after their appointment to assess knowledge, attitudes and acceptability of HIV testing. Subjects were three-hundred-and-eighty-one pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic for their booking appointment. There was no significant difference in the length of the booking appointments following the introduction of offering routine named HIV testing. One-hundred-and-fifty-eight women (42%) consented to testing with no positive results detected. There was a significant rise in the uptake of the test over the three-month period. No other variables (demographics, perceived risk, having read the leaflet) were predictive of uptake. Anxiety scores were significantly less after the booking appointment. Routine named HIV testing was feasibly introduced into a hospital antenatal clinic with minimum resource implications. Further study is needed to monitor the ongoing uptake rate and identification of HIV-positive women before a decision can be made as to the long-term benefit of this new service. Women considered it acceptable to be offered the HIV test and were less anxious after their appointments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Investigates the effectiveness of the British Department of Health's directive to make HIV antibody testing available to antenatal clinics. Cost of the directive; Need to provide specialized counselling to pregnant women.

Antenatal HIV screening policies throughout the British Isles surveyed and results linked to data on HlV-infected pregnant women notified through the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Units offering HIV testing to all pregnant women were compared with those offering it only to women considered to be at risk, and in both situations fewer than 50% of infected women were identified as HIV infected for the first time in antenatal clinics. Based on laboratory reports of HIV infection in women of childbearing age, paediatric reports of children born to HIV positive women and unlinked anonymous neonatal screening programmes there was evidence of under-recognition of HIV infection in pregnancy, particularly in England and Wales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]