Search

Silvoarable agroforestry systems have the potential to combat the negative effects of climate change while also enhancing productivity per unit land. Although the growth rate of large-spaced trees remains poorly investigated and the yield of annual intercrops uncertain, silvoarable agroforestry systems with poplar are receiving an ever-growing interest. This study assessed the growth of the new HES (High Environmental Sustainability) poplar clone, Moncalvo, arranged in 40-m spaced parallel alleys with a density of 35 trees ha−1 (SA, silvoarable). Their growth was compared to those cultivated in a specialized poplar plantation (C, control) with 277 trees ha−1, and the agronomic impact on wheat and soybean as intercrops was explored. Measurements took place between 2018 and 2021 during the first 4 years, which represents the midpoint of the expected poplar rotation. Here it was demonstrated that at the end of the investigated period, diameter at breast height was significantly greater (23.8 vs. 20.5 cm, +16%) and the plant height lower (14.3 vs. 15.5 m, −8%) in poplar grown in SA as compared to those in C, likely due to reduced intraspecific competition for environmental resources. In SA, seasonal tree phenology was delayed by approximately two weeks in spring, possibly due to the high sensitivity of poplar to low soil water content and cooler night air temperatures in springtime. The grain yield of wheat was not impaired by tree shading but instead occasionally improved when neighboring the poplar alley (e.g., year 2021: +28% at 12 m from the tree row vs. full sun conditions), while soybean yield was generally reduced (maximum −38% at 6 m from the tree row). This study innovatively studied the growth response of HES poplar clones in silvoarable systems by providing valuable insights into the growth dynamics of trees grown in combination with field crops. It is concluded that poplars in wide spaced alleys of silvoarable systems in temperate climates grow faster than poplars in plantations of high population density due to enhanced access to resources, while future investigations will allow for the identification of clone-specific rotation durations. In the arable tree interrow, winter crops more readily benefit from such agroforestry system than summer crops due to reduced cycle overlap and light competition with the tree canopy. • Stem diameter of poplars was greater in the silvoarable system vs. poplar plantation. • Tree phenology was delayed in the silvoarable system due to lower soil moisture. • Tree shading reduced the yield of soybean but improved that of winter wheat. • Tree vicinity was associated with higher grain protein content in winter wheat. • Positive effects of trees on intercrops were more relevant in dry and hot years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Agroforestry has been proposed as a sustainable agricultural system over conventional agriculture and forestry, conserving biodiversity and enhancing ecosystem service provision while not compromising productivity. However, the available evidence for the societal benefits of agroforestry is fragmented and does often not integrate diverse ecosystem services into the assessment. To upscale existing case-study insights to the European level, we conducted a meta-analysis on the effects of agroforestry on ecosystem service provision and on biodiversity levels. From 53 publications we extracted a total of 365 comparisons that were selected for the meta-analysis. Results revealed an overall positive effect of agroforestry (effect size = 0.454, p < 0.01) over conventional agriculture and forestry. However, results were heterogeneous, with differences among the types of agroforestry practices and ecosystem services assessed. Erosion control, biodiversity, and soil fertility are enhanced by agroforestry while there is no clear effect on provisioning services. The effect of agroforestry on biomass production is negative. Comparisons between agroforestry types and reference land-uses showed that both silvopastoral and silvoarable systems increase ecosystem service provision and biodiversity, especially when compared with forestry land. Mediterranean tree plantation systems should be especially targeted as soil erosion could be highly reduced while soil fertility increased. We conclude that agroforestry can enhance biodiversity and ecosystem service provision relative to conventional agriculture and forestry in Europe and could be a strategically beneficial land use in rural planning if its inherent complexity is considered in policy measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]