1. Impact of unusually wet permafrost soil on understory vegetation and CO2 exchange in a larch forest in eastern Siberia
- Author
-
Atsushi Saito, T. C. Maximov, Yoshihiro Iijima, Takeshi Ohta, Alexander V. Kononov, Ayumi Kotani, and Roman E. Petrov
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Atmospheric Science ,Global and Planetary Change ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,biology ,Primary production ,Forestry ,Understory ,Atmospheric sciences ,Permafrost ,biology.organism_classification ,01 natural sciences ,Forest ecology ,Soil water ,Environmental science ,Larch ,Ecosystem respiration ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,Water content ,010606 plant biology & botany ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
This study investigated the CO2 exchange over a 10-year period (2005–2014) inside and above a larch-dominant forest in the central Lena river basin, eastern Siberia. A wet-soil condition, such as that found in the active layer (seasonally thawed soil layer of upper permafrost), containing unusually high soil water close to saturation and partial surface waterlogging, was prolonged during the warm season of 2005–2009. In later years, the soil layer closer to the ground surface became dry (∼10% volumetric water content), although the deeper part remained relatively wet (∼30%). We quantitatively compared the whole forest and the understory CO2 exchanges to detect the separate effects of excessive soil waters on the overstory and understory vegetation. The conventional light and temperature response functions for half-hourly CO2 fluxes, that is, the net ecosystem exchange of daytime and night-time, respectively, were applicable to the understory observations. Comparison of the fitting parameters of the light response function at two levels revealed a smaller maximum net ecosystem exchange (NEE) under light saturation with a steep response under weak light conditions for the understory. The CO2 exchanges at the understory increased from the wet-soil period to the drying soil period by 46% (1.3 g C m−2 d−1) of gross primary production (GPP) and 29% (1.2 g C m−2 d−1) of ecosystem respiration (ER), while no trend was found in the ecosystem scale fluxes. These increases were due to an increasing understory biomass, changes in plentiful light and soil water in the inside-canopy environments, and enhanced turbulent mixing. The decline in the larch contribution could be compensated for by the understory growth and the remaining wetness of the active layer, which indicated that the interactions between the larch and the understory supported the stability of carbon cycles in this forest ecosystem.
- Published
- 2019