Search

Background Sláintecare advocates for right care, in the right place at the right time. ANPs for Older Persons in the community are uniquely placed to deliver care as close as possible to the older person’s home and to lead a holistic, flexible model of care minimising admission to acute care and maximising existing local resources. A pilot programme aimed at providing ANP led comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) (with Geriatrician support) to older people in a defined area commenced in June 2019. This pilot was part of a larger Hub and Spoke model funded by Sláintecare which gave additional MDT support. Methods A referral template was designed. Criteria for referral included; age > 75 years, Rockwood Frailty Scale 4–6 (focusing on Falls, Cognitive Impairment and Complex Frailty). Older people on the cusp of requiring long term care (LTC) were also prioritised. A prospective database of patients was maintained by the ANP to evaluate the service. Results From June 2019 to August 2021, 156 patients received an ANP led CGA, mostly conducted in the home. 247 reviews were conducted at the local spoke clinic and 46 joint ANP/Geriatrician home visits. Majority of referrals were from GP (n = 69), hospital (n = 30), LTC reviews (n = 22) and Community Nursing Units (CNUs) (n = 19). 449 outpatient appointments have been removed from the tertiary referral centre. Independent case load management from the ANP includes further appointments, telephone follow up/advice and she is a point of contact where crises arise before referral to acute services. 99% of patients surveyed reported satisfaction with the service especially the ease of local access and home visits. Conclusion Older Persons’ ANP can provide longitudinal care pathways for older adults in the community in conjunction with ICPOP and local CNUs, intervening before crises emerge and providing continuity of care and an alternative to acute care.

Background In September 2019 Sláintecare helped establish an Integrated Care team for Older People. The aim of this service was to provide a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) to older people within a community network. Service user experience/feedback are critically important for development of a team and a service. To give service users a platform to evaluate the service a patient experience survey was conducted. Methods The survey was designed by the multidisciplinary team, consisting of 13 closed/3 open questions. A Likert scale was utilised for closed questions and thematic analysis for open questions. A question on impact of COVID-19 was also included. 150 of the 950 service users who received a CGA from June 2020 to June 2021 were selected randomly and invited to participate in the postal survey. All participants received a covering letter, questionnaire and a stamped address envelope to return their completed surveys. Results 47% response rate (71/150). 77% were aged ≥75. 52% completed the survey themselves, 48% required assistance. 61% attended more than twice and most would prefer to attend a local spoke clinic. 96% agreed/strongly agreed that they were satisfied with the service. 99% felt they were treated with dignity/respect and had confidence in the service. 93% agreed that they were involved in care decisions. 82% reported their carers had the opportunity to discuss concerns. Themes emerging included importance of care close to home, avoiding acute hospital, difficulty parking at tertiary centres. 42% highlighted isolation and loneliness due to COVID-19 as a major issue. Conclusion Service users had an overwhelmingly positive experience especially when care was delivered in clinics close to their homes. Development of the hub and spoke model is acceptable and feasible to older people and their carers’ in this region and will be the focus for expansion of this service.

Background Lifestyle modifications, in older at risk populations, may prevent or slow the rate of cognitive decline. Promotion of brain health has been recommended by the WHO and other governing bodies. Supporting patients in making these lifestyle changes, however, can be complex. Generic guidance may not apply to all in a heterogenous and frail patient cohort, when physical mobility may be limited and weight loss/nutrition a concern. We sought to review current practices and barriers to brain health guidance in a regional integrated care outreach programme (ICOP). Methods From March–June’21 the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) of consecutive patients were reviewed. Those presenting with cognitive complaints, for their first assessment, were included. Demographic data and data on screening for hearing impairment and sleep disturbance were collected, in addition to information on physical activity and nutritional risk. Whether information and guidance on aspects of brain health was given was also assessed. Results 30 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 80.3 and the mean clinical frailty scale (CFS) was 4.4. Hearing impairment was present in 20% (n = 6), with no information available in 10% (n = 3). All patients were screened for sleep disturbance, with 13% (n = 4) not fully satisfied with their sleep. Mobility aids, assistance or supervision were required in 40% (n = 12), and 23% (n = 7) were at medium or high malnutrition risk. Only 30% (n = 9) cooked their own meals. Generic brain health advice, or advice about sleep was documented in 30 (n = 9), without hearing impairment advice documented in any patient. Conclusion There are several barriers to brain health advice in the ICOP setting, with only 30% of patients having brain health advice documented. We are currently developing patient information leaflets on brain health, that will take potential barriers into account. Dedicated and specific information on local hearing services is also in development, as part of an ongoing quality improvement project.

Background Sleep disturbance is common in the older patient, and has been associated with many common comorbidities, falls, impaired quality of life, and mortality. Sleep disturbance screening and management are important elements of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). There are few sleep disturbance assessment tools, however, that have been validated for use in older patients, or in those with cognitive impairment. We sought to review the assessment and management of sleep disturbance within a regional integrated care outreach programme (ICOP), where the RU-SATED tool had been used. Methods From March–June’21 the notes of 30 consecutive patients, presenting to ICOP with cognitive complaints, were reviewed. Demographic and sleep disturbance data were collected, in addition to whether advice, treatment or further assessment for sleep disturbance was documented. Feedback from staff on the utility of the RU-SATED tool was also sought. Results Of those reviewed, the mean age was 80.3 (SD = 7.8), and the mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (MOCA) was 17.7 (SD = 5.9). Where data was available, the mean RU-SATED score was 7.6 (SD = 1.9), and 42% were frail (n = 11). The most commonly endorsed sleep symptom was sleep onset latency/sleep maintenance issues (n = 16). RU-SATED score did not significantly predict age, MOCA or frailty (p > 0.1 for all). Advice, treatment or further assessment of sleep disturbance was offered to 23% of patients (n = 7), and this was not predicted by overall RU-SATED score or by individual question responses (p > 0.1 for all). Staff also stated that they found elements of the tool difficult to explain and interpret. Conclusion Although the numbers are small, we have not found the RU-SATED tool to be helpful in guiding the management of sleep disturbance in our cohort. A more practical CGA tool is currently in development by the ICOP service.

Background Home support services aim to support older people to remain at home. Despite substantial investment in home support hours (€600 million), this has not translated into increased carers on the ground for older people. We aimed to report patterns of home support service utilisation in older patients with memory problems, and identify any mis-matches between allocated and received hours, and the impact on patients and caregivers. Methods Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients referred to community geriatric clinic from January 2021 to May 2022. 95/104 patients who were identified were suitable for inclusion. Results Participants had a median age of 82 (IQR 78-86) of whom 57% were female (n=54). 80% (n=76) were frail (CFS ≥4), with 82% dependent for IADLs (Lawton-Brody IADL Scale ≤6). Median MOCA score was 18, with 44% having moderate to severe cognitive impairment (MOCA ≤17). 40% of patients lived with alone (n=38). 52% (n=49) received formal home supports while 80% (n=76) had an informal carer. 37% (n=18) had a mismatch between hours allocated and hours received. There was a significant difference between median hours of care allocated (7) and median hours of care received (5), p Conclusion In this vulnerable population with cognitive and functional decline, just over half received formal home support hours. A large proportion experienced significant mismatch between allocated and received hours. Family and informal caregivers often have to fill gaps, adding to existing carer strain. Future models of home support should prioritise early intervention for people with IADL loss to remain independent at home and broaden of the scope of practice of carers to facilitate this.

Background The Frailty at the Front Door service is a novel service that provides comprehensive geriatric assessment in the emergency department for older adults who have an unplanned emergency presentation to hospital. It is important to monitor outcomes of patients discharged by the service to ensure appropriate patient selection. Methods Patients over the age of 75 with a Manchester Triage Score of between three and five and a possible frailty syndrome are eligible for review by the service. After initial review patients are either discharged directly or recommended for admission. We reviewed the outcomes of patients who were discharged directly after Emergency Department (ED) assessment by the service. Results Discharge disposition was available for review in 413 (95%) of patients since initiation of the service in October 2021. 30% (n= 122) of patients were discharged directly after initial ED review. Elevated 4AT score (p = 0.002) but not frailty (p = 0.80) was associated with decreased chances of direct discharge. Of patients discharged directly from ED 13% were reviewed post discharge by the community integrated care team (GICOP), with 43% of these reviews taking place within 30 days. Overall, 16% of patients discharged directly represented to ED within 30 days. There was a trend towards lower rates of representation to ED among patients who were seen by GICOP after discharge from ED (p = 0.12). Conclusion There was a high rate of direct discharge after review by the service, with low rates of representation to hospital. While limited by low numbers there was a trend towards lower representation rates in patients reviewed post-discharge by the integrated care team. Future quality improvement initiatives will aim to improve the integration between the services and highlighting patients who would benefit from more timely reviews.

Background Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a cornerstone in geriatric care. Objective findings from CGA may differ to patient and carer reported symptoms. This study compared patient reported symptoms with objective metrics collected during CGA and explored the relationship with carer burnout. Methods Cross-sectional study of patients attending an Advanced Nurse Practitioner (ANP)-led integrated care clinic. Patient-reported geriatric syndromes included low mood, memory concerns, incontinence, falls or dizziness. CGA metrics collected included Barthel Index, Lawton IADLs, MOCA scores, Geriatric depression scale scores, Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) scores and presence or absence of carer burnout. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the relationship between these variables and logistic regression explored the magnitude of association with carer burnout. Results We reviewed 99 CGAs over three months. Median age was 81 (IQR 75–86) with 62% female. Cognitive impairment was present in 96% of patients. Self-reported memory trouble was associated with lower MOCA scores (9 vs 23, p < 0.001) and the presence of dizziness was associated with an increased prevalence of falls (89% vs 24%, < 0.001). The presence of incontinence and functional dependency on IADL were both associated with carer strain and a larger magnitude of association with carer strain was seen with increasing frailty (OR 13.7, 95% CI 3.8-58.8 for moderate to severe frailty) than moderate to severe cognitive impairment (OR 8, 95% CI 3.0–24.1) Conclusion Older people reported a wide range of symptoms often subtle, some of which are unmasked during CGA. The resultant frailty syndromes often represent increasing degrees of functional impairment impacting on patient and carer quality of life. Striking the balance between patient reported symptoms and objective measurement is important to allow individualised care pathways to be developed as well as highlighting patients at risk of functional and cognitive decline.