Search

Background StandingTall uses eHealth to deliver evidence-based balance and functional strength exercises. Clinical trials have demonstrated improved balance, reduced falls and fall-related injuries and high adherence. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of StandingTall into health services in Australia and the UK. Methods Two hundred and forty-six participants (Australia, n =  184; UK, n =  62) were recruited and encouraged to use StandingTall for 2 h/week for 6-months. A mixed-methods process evaluation assessed uptake and acceptability of StandingTall. Adherence, measured as % of prescribed dose completed, was the primary outcome. Results The study, conducted October 2019 to September 2021 in Australia and November 2020 to April 2022 in the UK, was affected by COVID-19. Participants' mean age was 73 ± 7 years, and 196 (81%) were female. Of 129 implementation partners (e.g. private practice clinicians, community exercise providers, community service agencies) approached, 34% (n =  44) agreed to be implementation partners. Of 41 implementation partners who referred participants, 15 (37%) referred ≥5. Participant uptake was 42% (198/469) with mean adherence over 6 months being 41 ± 39% of the prescribed dose (i.e. 39 ± 41 min/week) of exercise. At 6 months, 120 (76%) participants indicated they liked using StandingTall , 89 (56%) reported their balance improved (moderately to a great deal better) and 125 (80%) rated StandingTall as good to excellent. For ongoing sustainability, health service managers highlighted the need for additional resources. Conclusions StandingTall faced challenges in uptake, adoption and sustainability due to COVID-19 and a lack of ongoing funding. Adherence levels were lower than the effectiveness trial, but were higher than other exercise studies. Acceptance was high, indicating promise for future implementation, provided sufficient resources and support are made available. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619001329156. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background the individually delivered Lifestyle-integrated Functional Exercise (LiFE) was shown to improve physical activity (PA) and reduce fall incidence, however being rather resource-consuming due to one-to-one delivery. A potentially less resource-intensive group format (gLiFE) was developed and compared against the original program, considering higher risk of falling due to possible PA enhancement. Objective to investigate non-inferiority in terms of PA-adjusted fall risk and cost-effectiveness of gLiFE at 12-month follow-up. Design single-blinded, randomised, multi-centre non-inferiority trial. Setting community. Subjects in total, 309 adults aged 70+ years at risk of or with history of falling; n  = 153 in gLiFE, n  = 156 in LiFE. Methods LiFE was delivered one-to-one at the participants' homes, gLiFE in a group. PA-adjusted fall risk was analysed using negative binomial regression to compare incidence rate ratios (IRR). Cost-effectiveness was presented by incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves, considering quality-adjusted life years, PA and falls as effect measures. Secondary analyses included PA (steps/day) and fall outcomes. Results non-inferiority was inconclusive (IRR 0.96; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.67; 1.37); intervention costs were lower for gLiFE, but cost-effectiveness was uncertain. gLiFE participants significantly increased PA (+1,090 steps/day; 95% CI 345 and 1.835) versus insignificant increase in LiFE (+569, 95% CI −31; 1,168). Number of falls and fallers were reduced in both formats. Conclusion non-inferiority of gLiFE compared with LiFE was inconclusive after 12 months. Increases in PA were clinically relevant in both groups, although nearly twice as high in gLiFE. Despite lower intervention costs of gLiFE, it was not clearly superior in terms of cost-effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Falls and fall-related health service use among older adults continue to increase. The New South Wales Health Department, Australia, is delivering the Stepping On fall prevention programme at scale. We compared fall-related health service use in Stepping On participants and matched controls. Methods A non-randomised observational trial was undertaken using 45 and Up Study data. 45 and Up Study participants who did and did not participate in Stepping On were extracted in a 1:4 ratio. Rates of fall-related health service use from linked routinely collected data were compared between participants and controls over time using multilevel Poisson regression models with adjustment for the minimally sufficient set of confounders identified from a directed acyclic graph. Results Data from 1,452 Stepping On participants and 5,799 controls were analysed. Health service use increased over time and was greater in Stepping On participants (rate ratios (RRs) 1.47–1.82) with a spike in use in the 6 months prior to programme participation. Significant interactions indicated differential patterns of health service use in participants and controls: stratified analyses revealed less fall-related health service use in participants post-programme compared to pre-programme (RRs 0.32–0.48), but no change in controls' health service use (RRs 1.00–1.25). Gender was identified to be a significant effect modifier for health service use (P  < 0.05 for interaction). Discussion Stepping On appeared to mitigate participants' rising fall-related health service use. Best practice methods were used to maximise this study's validity, but cautious interpretation of results is required given its non-randomised nature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background falls and fall-related injuries are common in older adults, have negative effects on functional independence and quality of life and are associated with increased morbidity, mortality and health related costs. Current guidelines are inconsistent, with no up-to-date, globally applicable ones present. Objectives to create a set of evidence- and expert consensus-based falls prevention and management recommendations applicable to older adults for use by healthcare and other professionals that consider: (i) a person-centred approach that includes the perspectives of older adults with lived experience, caregivers and other stakeholders; (ii) gaps in previous guidelines; (iii) recent developments in e-health and (iv) implementation across locations with limited access to resources such as low- and middle-income countries. Methods a steering committee and a worldwide multidisciplinary group of experts and stakeholders, including older adults, were assembled. Geriatrics and gerontological societies were represented. Using a modified Delphi process, recommendations from 11 topic-specific working groups (WGs), 10 ad-hoc WGs and a WG dealing with the perspectives of older adults were reviewed and refined. The final recommendations were determined by voting. Recommendations all older adults should be advised on falls prevention and physical activity. Opportunistic case finding for falls risk is recommended for community-dwelling older adults. Those considered at high risk should be offered a comprehensive multifactorial falls risk assessment with a view to co-design and implement personalised multidomain interventions. Other recommendations cover details of assessment and intervention components and combinations, and recommendations for specific settings and populations. Conclusions the core set of recommendations provided will require flexible implementation strategies that consider both local context and resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background globally, falls and fall-related injuries are the leading cause of injury-related morbidity and mortality in older people. In our ageing society healthcare costs are increasing, therefore programmes that reduce falls and are considered value for money are needed. Objective to complete an economic evaluation of an e-Health balance exercise programme that reduced falls and injurious falls in community-dwelling older people compared to usual care from a health and community-care funder perspective. Design a within-trial economic evaluation of an assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial with 2 years of follow-up. Setting StandingTall was delivered via tablet-computer at home to older community-dwelling people in Sydney, Australia. Participants five hundred and three individuals aged 70+ years who were independent in activities of daily living, without cognitive impairment, progressive neurological disease or any other unstable or acute medical condition precluding exercise. Main outcome measures cost-effectiveness was measured as the incremental cost per fall and per injurious fall prevented. Cost-utility was measured as the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Main results the total average cost per patient for programme delivery and care resource cost was $8,321 (standard deviation [SD] 18,958) for intervention participants and $6,829 (SD 15,019) for control participants. The incremental cost per fall prevented was $4,785 and per injurious fall prevented was $6,585. The incremental cost per QALY gained was $58,039 (EQ5D-5L) and $110,698 (AQoL-6D). Conclusion this evaluation found that StandingTall has the potential to be cost-effective in specific subpopulations of older people, but not necessarily the whole older population. Trial registration ACTRN12615000138583. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: participation restriction, defined as ‘problems an individual may experience in involvement in life situations' (e.g. work and leisure), reflects difficulty functioning at a societal level and is a key component of disability. Our objective was to describe changes in participation in older men over a 2-year period and to identify baseline variables associated with participation and change in participation over the 2-year period.Methods: one thousand and three hundred and twenty-seven community-dwelling men aged 70 years or over who completed the baseline and 2-year follow-up phases of the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project, a population-based cohort study in Sydney, Australia, were studied. Participation restriction and a range of other variables were measured using self-report and performance measures. Regression analyses were conducted to examine factors associated with participation and change in participation.Results: over the 2-year period, participation in life roles deteriorated in 47.3% (627/1,327) of men, stayed the same in 20.7% (275/1,327) and improved in the remainder (32.0%). Overall, there was a significant deterioration in participation (P < 0.001). Reduced participation at 2-year follow-up was significantly associated with the following baseline factors: age, more comorbidities, mild cognitive impairment or dementia, lower mood, weakness, slower gait, worse activities of daily living performance, driving and baseline participation score. These variables explained 56% of the variance in participation at 2 years.Conclusion: participation in life roles worsened over a 2-year period in some community-dwelling older men. A number of associated factors were identified, which may provide targets for intervention to improve participation among older men. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Focuses on a study that deals with the danger in the home involving falls and fractures to the elderly. Introduction; Methods; Results; Discussion.