Search

Introduction: Trauma deaths account for 8% of all deaths in Egypt. Patients with multiple injuries are at high risk but may be saved with a good triage system and a well-trained trauma team in dedicated institutions. The incidence of missed injuries in the Emergency Centre (EC) of Suez Canal University Hospital (SCUH) was found to be 9.0% after applying Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines. However, this rate is still high compared with many trauma centers. Aim: Improve the quality of management of polytrauma patients by decreasing the incidence of missed injuries by implementing the Sequential Trauma Education Programs (STEPs) course in the EC at SCUH. Methods: This interventional training study was conducted in the SCUH EC that adheres to CONSORT guidelines. The study was conducted during the one month precourse and for 6 months after the implementation of the STEPs course for EC physicians. Overall, 458 polytrauma patients were randomly selected, of which 45 were found to have missed injuries after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We assessed the clinical relevance of these cases for missed injuries before and after the STEPs course. Results: Overall, 45 patients were found to have missed injuries, of which 15 (12%) were pre-STEPs and 30 (9%) were post-STEPs course. The STEPs course significantly increased adherence to vital data recording, but the reduction of missed injuries (3.0%) was not statistically significant in relation to demographic and trauma findings. However, the decrease in missed injuries in the post-STEPs course group was an essential clinically significant finding. Conclusion: STEPs course implementation decreased the incidence of missed injuries in polytrauma patients. Thus, the STEPs course can be considered at the same level of other advanced trauma courses as a training skills program or possibly better in dealing with trauma patients. Repetition of this course by physicians should be mandatory to prevent more missed injuries. Therefore, the validation of STEPs course certification should be completed at least every two years to help decrease the number of missed injuries, especially in low-income countries and low-resource settings.

Introduction: “Delayed discharge” is defined as patients who remain hospitalised beyond the time of being fit for discharge after a decision of discharge has been made by the managing team. There is no standardised amount of time defining delayed discharge documented in the literature, and there is a lack of evidence about this topic in Egypt. This study is a quality improvement project aiming to identify the factors associated with discharge delays at a single centre in Egypt in order to address this issue. Methods: A prospective observational study included all trauma patients admitted to a University Hospital in Egypt over two months. The time of the decision of discharge and actual discharge time were recorded by reviewing patients' medical records. The patients and their caregivers were asked to fill in a questionnaire about the reasons for delayed discharge. Potential reasons for the delayed discharge were classified into system-related, medical and family-related factors. Results: The study included 498 patients with a median age of 41 years (9–72). The median time from discharge decision until actual discharge was 3 h. System-related factors were documented in 48.8% of cases, followed by medical factors (36.3%), and family-related factors (28.1%). When controlling for age, gender and injury severity score using a logistic regression analysis, longer time to discharge (≥3 h) showed a stronger association with medical factors [adjusted OR (95% CI) = 5.44 (2.73–10.85)] and family-related factors [adjusted OR (95% CI) = 7.94 (3.40–18.54)] compared to system-related factors [adjusted OR (95% CI) = 2.20 (1.12–4.29)]. Discussion: Although system-related factors were more prevalent, medical and family-related factors appear to be associated with longer discharge delays compared to system-related factors.