Search

Background: Hyperpigmented scars, particularly in exposed body areas, can be difficult to conceal and may evoke psychological distress. While the precise causes of scar dyschromia are not fully understood, alterations in melanogenic activity appear to hold more significance than changes in melanocyte quantity. Current treatments encompass laser interventions. However, it is essential to consider their costs and potential complications in relation to their limited proven effectiveness. Fat grafting has gained interest as a scar modulation technique due to its regenerative properties, and its efficacy in reducing scar hyperpigmentation is currently under investigation. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was reported according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were accessed. PROSPERO registration number is CRD42023457778. The primary outcome was a change in scar pigmentation after fat grafting. Pigmentation changes after fat grafting were calculated using the standardized mean difference (SMD) between baseline and postoperative scores according to POSAS and VSS scales. Bias assessment was conducted according to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence quality assessment tool. Results: A total of 8 articles meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified, involving 323 patients with hyperpigmented scars treated with fat grafting. A significant difference in scar pigmentation was noted after treatment with fat grafting according to observers' ratings, with a SMD of − 1.09 [95% CI: − 1.32; − 0.85], p<0.01. The SMD for patient-reported scar pigmentation after treatment with fat grafting was − 0.99 [96% CI: − 1.31; − 0.66], p<0.01. Four studies provided objective measurements of melanin changes after fat grafting and revealed inconsistent findings compared to subjective observations. Conclusions: Fat grafting shows promise in ameliorating hyperpigmented scars based on subjective assessments, but further corroborating evidence from objective measures is required. Level of Evidence IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the past few years, the clinical use of injectable artificial materials in plastic surgery has increased. In addition, autologous lipoimplantation is being performed for volume replacement of soft tissue for aesthetic purposes. In this study, acellular allogenic dermis was utilized as a scaffold for the culturing of preadipocytes, confirming the possibility of three-dimensional proliferation of progenitor cells, the eventual differentiation of stromal cells in adipose tissue into the adipocytes, and the in vivo implantation of such adipocytes to form fat tissue. Preadipocytes, recently called ASCs (adipose tissue-derived stromal/stem cells), were cultured in acellular allogenic dermis, successfully attached to the dermal particles in a three-dimensional structure, and proliferated, differentiated, and eventually formed a cluster. For the in vivo implantation, four groups were formed: the first group was cultured within the dermal scaffold for 24 h before implantation (24-h preconditioned group), the second group was induced for differentiation for 10 days before implantation (10-day preconditioned group), the third group was implanted immediately after cell propagation (nonpreconditioned group), and the control group was implanted with only dermal scaffold. In vivo implanted preadipocytes showed great differentiation into adipocytes within the dermal scaffolds. Also, the 10-day preconditioned group showed a greater volume of fat tissue compared to the 24-h preconditioned group. From these results, we confirmed that after a three-dimensional culture in acellular allogenic dermis, implanted preadipocytes formed a greater amount of fat tissue and that this could be a possible effective method for future soft tissue restoration. No Level Assigned: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]