Search

The VISIONARY study demonstrated statistically significant intraocular pressure (IOP) reductions with the preservative-free fixed-dose combination of tafluprost 0.0015% and timolol 0.5% (PF tafluprost/timolol FC) in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) patients, sub-optimally controlled with topical prostaglandin analogue (PGA) or beta-blocker monotherapy. Current subanalyses have examined these data according to the baseline monotherapy.A European, prospective, observational study included adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with OAG or OHT, who were switched to the PF tafluprost/timolol FC from PGA or beta-blocker monotherapy. Treatment outcomes were reported according to prior monotherapy subgroup: beta-blocker, preserved latanoprost, PF-latanoprost, bimatoprost, tafluprost, and travoprost. Endpoints included the mean change from baseline regarding IOP, conjunctival hyperemia, and corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) at Week 4 and Week 12, and at Month 6.The subanalysis included 577 patients. All prior monotherapy subgroups demonstrated statistically significant IOP reductions from baseline at Week 4, that were maintained through Month 6 (p 0.001). Mean (SD) IOP change at Month 6 was 6.6 (4.16), 6.3 (4.39), 5.6 (3.67), 4.9 (2.97), 4.6 (4.39), and 4.7 (3.64) mmHg for prior beta-blocker, preserved latanoprost, PF-latanoprost, tafluprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost subgroups, respectively. The largest IOP change was observed in the preserved latanoprost subgroup for each of the ≥ 20%, ≥ 25%, ≥ 30%, and ≥ 35% IOP reduction categories at Month 6, demonstrating respective reductions of 8.06, 9.20, 10.64, and 11.55 mmHg. CFS was significantly reduced at Month 6 in the prior bimatoprost subgroup (p = 0.0013). Conjunctival hyperemia severity was significantly reduced at each study visit for prior preserved latanoprost users (p 0.001).PF tafluprost/timolol FC therapy provided statistically and clinically significant IOP reductions from Week 4 over the total 6-month period, in patients with OAG/OHT, regardless of the type of prior PGA or beta-blocker monotherapy used. Conjunctival hyperemia severity and CFS decreased significantly in prior bimatoprost and preserved latanoprost users, respectively.European Union electronic Register of Post-Authorization Studies (EU PAS) register number: EUPAS22204.

Introduction The efficacy of lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) and safety of switching to travoprost/timolol fixed combination ophthalmic solution (Duotrav®, Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma or ocular hypertension undergoing prostaglandin analog (PGA) monotherapy was investigated. Methods Patients treated with travoprost, latanoprost, tafluprost, or bimatoprost for ≥3 months and requiring additional medication were switched to Duotrav without washout. Baseline IOP was calculated from measurements at two visits during PGA monotherapy. IOP reductions at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after switching to Duotrav and adverse events were assessed. Results Of 162 patients enrolled, 157 patients (96.9%) with ≥4 weeks of follow-up after switching to Duotrav were analyzed. The mean IOP decreased significantly (baseline = 16.3 ± 3.1 mmHg; 4 weeks = 14.6 ± 3.1 mmHg, 8 weeks = 14.7 ± 3.3 mmHg, 12 weeks = 14.6 ± 3.2 mmHg; all P

Introduction We examined the sustainability of the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of travoprost (0.004%) ophthalmic solution in subjects with normal tension glaucoma (NTG). Methods Travoprost ophthalmic solution was given once daily at 9 PM to subjects with newly diagnosed NTG or with NTG who had not received any ocular hypotensives within the previous 30 days. IOP was measured at three time points (9 AM, 1 PM, and 5 PM) at baseline and week 12 visits, and at one time point (9 AM) at week 4 and week 8 visits. Conjunctival hyperemia, superficial punctate keratopathy, and other adverse events were evaluated during the observation period. Results Thirty subjects (12 males and 18 females; mean age 65.6 years) from 32 subjects enrolled were included in the efficacy analysis. The mean IOPs (±standard deviation) of 16.6 ± 1.4, 15.7 ± 1.8, and 15.7 ± 2.2 mmHg at 9 AM, 1 PM, and 5 PM, respectively, at baseline reduced significantly to the mean IOPs of 13.0 ± 1.8, 12.7 ± 1.8, and 12.8 ± 1.6 mmHg, respectively, at week 12 (P

Patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension who do not achieve target intraocular pressure (IOP) using one hypotensive agent are often transitioned to combination therapy. Travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination (TTFC) has shown efficacy in patients whose IOP is not controlled with other therapies. The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of transitioning to TTFC in patients whose IOP was uncontrolled on bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5%, administered concomitantly or as a fixed combination.This was a prospective, open-label, multicenter study of patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who transitioned to TTFC from fixed or unfixed bimatoprost/timolol. Patients self-administered TTFC once daily for 8 weeks, and efficacy and safety were assessed at baseline, Week 4, and Week 8. A symptom survey was administered at baseline and Week 8. Both patients and investigators reported their medication preference at Week 8.A total of 105 patients were enrolled in the study. Mean IOP decreased by 16.5% from baseline after 8 weeks of TTFC therapy in the total population, 15.0% in patients transitioning from fixed-combination therapy, and 20.8% in patients transitioning from unfixed therapy (P0.001 for all groups). The percentage of patients reaching target IOP (≤18 mmHg) after treatment with TTFC was 69.2% (P0.001). Patients judged stinging/burning to be less severe with TTFC than with prior therapy (P=0.029); all other symptom frequencies and severities were similar for both treatments. Patients preferred TTFC over bimatoprost/timolol (fixed and unfixed) at a ratio of more than 4:1 (81.4% vs. 18.6%; P0.001), and investigators reported a nearly five-fold preference for TTFC (83.3% vs. 16.7%; P0.001). No unexpected safety concerns with TTFC were observed.Travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination produced a significant reduction in IOP, with favorable safety and tolerability profiles. Both patients and investigators strongly preferred TTFC to prior bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% therapy.

Two prospective, controlled, multicenter, double-masked studies--one lasting 6 months (n=594) and the other, 12 months (n=787)--examined the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of travoprost in 1381 black and nonblack patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Investigated regimens were travoprost 0.004% once daily, latanoprost 0.005% once daily, and timolol 0:5% twice daily. In both studies, mean IOP was significantly lower in blacks treated with travoprost. The IOP reduction was also significantly greater in blacks after adjustments for age, sex, iris color, diagnosis, and corneal thickness. Timolol lowered mean IOP to a greater extent in nonblack patients. The significantly larger IOP reduction with travoprost compared with timolol in both racial groups was more pronounced in blacks. Travoprost also was superior to latanoprost in blacks. Mean changes from baseline generally were greater for black than for nonblack patients, although the differences did not achieve statistical significance. The response rate to travoprost was higher in blacks. The most common adverse effect was hyperemia.

This randomized, investigator-masked, multicenter, parallel-design trial compared the IOP-lowering efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03% and travoprost 0.004% in African Americans with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. After a washout of all ocular hypotensive agents, patients were assigned to bimatoprost once daily (n=16) or travoprost once daily (n=15) for 3 months. Study visits were at baseline and at months 1, 2, and 3. Primary outcome measures were the percentage of patients who achieved selected target pressures and the mean reduction in IOP from baseline at month 3. Both drugs comparably lowered IOP, but bimatoprost was more likely than travoprost to allow achievement of every target pressure from 12 to 19 mm Hg at month 3. After 3 months, the mean IOP reduction from baseline was 8.4 mm Hg (34%) in the bimatoprost group and 7.9 mm Hg (30%) in the travoprost group. These results are being evaluated further in a larger clinical trial.

To compare the 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) control and tolerability of travoprost/timolol benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-free (TTFC) vs. latanoprost/timolol fixed combination preserved with BAK (LTFC) in open-angle glaucoma patients insufficiently controlled with latanoprost 0.005% monotherapy given once in the evening. The authors have conducted a prospective, observer-masked, active-controlled, cross-over, comparison study. Qualified open-angle glaucoma patients who demonstrated a latanoprost-treated morning IOP (10:00 ± 1 h) greater than 20 mmHg on two separate visits were randomized for 3 months to receive either TTFC or LTFC. Patients were then crossed over to the opposite treatment for another 3 months. At the end of the latanoprost run-in and after each 3-month therapy period patients underwent 24-h IOP monitoring in the habitual position using Goldmann applanation tonometry in the sitting position during the day (10:00, 14:00, 18:00 and 22:00) and Perkins tonometry in the supine position at night (02:00 and 06:00). Selected ocular surface parameters were evaluated after each therapy period. Forty-two open-angle glaucoma patients completed the study. The mean 24-h baseline IOP on latanoprost was 21.5 ± 1.6 mmHg. Both fixed combinations significantly reduced the IOP at each time point, for the mean, peak and fluctuation of 24-h IOP compared with latanoprost monotherapy (P

This in-vitro study compared the toxicity of bimatoprost 0.01% containing benzalkonium chloride (BAK) 0.02% with other commercial BAK-free or BAK-containing prostaglandin analogs.Six test solutions were evaluated: travoprost 0.004% with polyquaternium-1 0.001% (PQ), PQ, bimatoprost 0.01% with BAK 0.02%, latanoprost 0.005% with BAK 0.02%, tafluprost 0.0015% preservative free (PF), and BAK 0.02%. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was the live control and 70% methanol was the dead control. Confluent human corneal epithelial cells were incubated with test solutions (diluted 1:5 or 1:10 with PBS) or control solutions for 10 or 25 min, after which cells were fluorescently labeled to distinguish live and dead cells. Data were expressed as a percentage of PBS live-cell fluorescence for automated readouts. Live and dead cells were manually counted for numeric analyses.For 1:5 and 1:10 dilutions using automated readout, cells exposed to bimatoprost with BAK, latanoprost with BAK, and BAK alone demonstrated significant reductions in the live cell signal compared with PBS, travoprost with PQ, and PQ alone (all P0.001). They also demonstrated significantly greater toxicity than tafluprost PF for 1:5 dilutions (all P0.001) and 1:10 dilutions (P ≤ 0.02), except for 1:10-diluted bimatoprost with BAK (P = 0.41). For 1:5 dilutions using manual cell count, cells exposed to bimatoprost with BAK demonstrated significant reductions in the percentage of live cells compared with PBS (P = 0.02). For 1:10 dilutions using manual cell count, cells exposed to bimatoprost with BAK, latanoprost with BAK, and BAK alone demonstrated significantly greater toxicity than PBS, travoprost with PQ, PQ alone, and tafluprost PF (all P ≤ 0.03). No significant differences were observed among PBS, travoprost with PQ, and PQ alone under any test conditions (P ≤ 0.63).This study demonstrated that BAKcontaining solutions, including bimatoprost 0.01% with BAK, were toxic to human corneal epithelial cells, whereas BAK-free solutions showed little to no evidence of toxicity.

INTRODUCTION|: To investigate potentially adverse effects of different topical glaucoma medications and preservatives on cultured ocular epithelial cells. METHODS|: Confluent cultures of human corneal (10.014 pRSV-T) and conjunctival cells (1-5c-4) were assayed with 100 μL of different glaucoma medications for 25 minutes at 37°C and 5% CO₂. We also tested the preservative sofZia® (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA), as well as a range of concentrations of the preservative benzalkonium chloride (BAK; 0.001% to 0.050%). Balanced salt solution was used as the "live" control and a solution containing 70% methanol and 0.2% saponin was used as a "dead" control. The LIVE/DEAD viability/cytotoxicity kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to determine the percentage of dead and live cells via ethidium homodimer and calcein fluorescence, respectively. RESULTS|: The toxicity of the prostaglandin analogs latanoprost, tafluprost and travoprost preserved with BAK was similar to the toxicity observed in their respective BAK concentrations. The prostaglandin analog travoprost (0.004%) preserved with the oxidizing preservative sofZia had much greater corneal and conjunctival cell survival than travoprost preserved with BAK. Travoprost (0.004%) containing polyquad also performed statistically better than its BAK-preserved formulation. CONCLUSION|: Ocular surface side effects have previously been demonstrated with chronic, long-term exposure to intraocular pressure-lowering medications containing the common preservative BAK. BAK alone has significant in-vitro cytotoxicity to cultured ocular epithelial cells. Substitution of BAK with polyquad or sofZia resulted in significantly higher percentages of live conjunctival and corneal cells. Further studies are needed to understand the- clinical implications of these findings.

Chronic topical glaucoma therapy has been reported to cause deleterious changes to the ocular surface epithelial layers. We compare changes in the number of goblet cells after chronic exposure to latanoprost preserved with 0.02% benzalkonium chloride (BAK) eye drops (Xalatan; Pfizer, NY, USA), travoprost preserved with sofZia eye drops (Travatan Z; Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA), or preservative-free artificial tears (Refresh Plus; Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA).Fifteen New Zealand white rabbits were randomised into groups of five (one eye was randomised for treatment) and received once-daily topical application of one of the three treatments for 30 days. Enucleation was performed at the end of the study followed by histologic analysis using mucin stains to identify goblet cells. Goblet cells were quantified and analysed using Student t tests to compare means between groups.Goblet cells per high-power field were 2.21 (+/-0.40) in the latanoprost with BAK group, 6.02 (+/-1.20) in the travoprost with sofZia group, and 7.03 (+/-1.33) in the preservative-free artificial tear group. The number of goblet cells in the latanoprost with BAK group was significantly lower than the other two groups (P=0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in goblet cell numbers between the travoprost with sofZia and preservative-free artificial tear group (P=0.24).Our study illustrates that, in this animal model, once-daily dosing of latanoprost with 0.02% BAK resulted in goblet cell loss compared with dosing with either travoprost with sofZia or preservative-free artificial tears.

The corneal toxicity of 2 intraocular pressure-lowering agents was compared in a rabbit cornea model with New Zealand White rabbits. Corneal epithelial morphology and cell size were assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy. Baseline microscopic examinations were performed on 1 eye of each animal. Two weeks later, the eyes were bathed for 3 min in travoprost 0.004% preserved without benzalkonium chloride (BAK( or latanoprost 0.005% preserved with 0.02% BAK; the eyes were then rinsed with balanced salt solution, and the corneas were again examined by confocal microscopy (n=4/group). A second group of animals was exposed to the medications through a dosing regimen of 1 drop/min (lpar3 drops total) (n=4/group). In eyes treated with travoprost without BAK (3-min bath), superficial epithelial cells were similar to baseline, as indicated by their visible cell borders and bright nuclei. In contrast, the surface cells in eyes treated with latanoprost were significantly smaller and brighter and had less distinct borders. Surface cell size was significantly smaller as compared with baseline size and as compared with rabbits treated with travoprost without BAK for 3 min. Similar effects on corneal epithelial cell morphology were observed with the 1-drop/min dosing regimen. In this rabbit model, travoprost 0.004% preserved without BAK did not cause corneal epithelial toxicity; latanoprost 0.005% induced superficial cell loss, most likely caused by the presence of a relatively high concentration of BAK (0.02%).

The purpose of this study was to compare the relative toxicity of a new topical ophthalmic glaucoma medication, travoprost 0.004% without benzalkonium chloride (BAK), with that of commercially available latanoprost 0.005% (preserved with 0.02% BAK) in immortalized human corneal epithelial cells (HCEs). Tissue culture plates (96 well) containing HCEs were divided into 6 groups. Two groups served as negative controls (70% methanol and gentamicin). Another 2 groups--1 in corneal epithelial culture media and the other in a hydroxypropyl (HP)-Guargellable lubricant eyedrop--served as live controls. The travoprost 0.004% without BAK and latanoprost 0.005% groups were exposed to 100 microL of the undiluted solutions. Cells were incubated for 25 min at 37 degree C. A live/dead assay was used to measure the effects of travoprost without BAK and of latanoprost on HCEs compared to 70% methanol and culture medium. Between the 2 glaucoma medications tested, travoprost 0.004% preserved without BAK showed significantly less toxicity on HCEs than did latanoprost 0.005%. This difference may have ramifications in terms of tolerability for patients who use these topical glaucoma drugs on a long-term basis.

There has been increased attention on the potential impact of the preservative benzalkonium chloride (BAK) on the ocular surface. This study compared the ocular surface tolerability of once-daily bimatoprost 0.01% and latanoprost 0.005% (both preserved with 0.02% BAK), and travoprost 0.004% preserved with sofZia™.A randomized, multicenter (15 sites), investigator-masked study enrolled patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who had received latanoprost monotherapy for at least 1 month. Patients were randomized to oncedaily bimatoprost (n = 56), travoprost (n = 53), or latanoprost (n = 55) monotherapy for 3 months. Follow-up visits were at weeks 1, 4, and 12. The primary outcome measure was physician-graded conjunctival hyperemia (scale 0 to 3) at week 12. Secondary outcomes included corneal staining (scale 0 to 3) and tear break-up time (TBUT).There were no significant differences in mean (standard deviation [SD]) outcome measures including conjunctival hyperemia (bimatoprost: 0.48 [0.52], travoprost: 0.49 [0.52], latanoprost: 0.51 [0.54]), corneal staining (bimatoprost: 0.31 [0.49], travoprost: 0.25 [0.46], latanoprost: 0.24 [0.45]), or TBUT (bimatoprost: 9.7 s [6.1], travoprost: 9.5 s [5.8], latanoprost: 9.8 s [5.0]) among subjects at latanoprost-treated baseline (P ≥ 0.664). At week 12, there were no significant differences in conjunctival hyperemia (bimatoprost: 0.42 [0.48], travoprost: 0.46 [0.44], latanoprost: 0.44 [0.57]), corneal staining (bimatoprost: 0.31 [0.45], travoprost: 0.32 [0.48], latanoprost: 0.22 [0.30]), or TBUT (bimatoprost: 9.7 s [5.7], travoprost 9.7 s [5.0], latanoprost: 9.3 s [4.0]) among the treatment groups (P ≥ 0.379). At week 1, there was a statistically significant among-group difference in mean change from baseline in hyperemia (+0.04, bimatoprost; +0.20, travoprost; 0.00, latanoprost; P = 0.018). There were no statistically significant among-group differences in mean corneal staining, mean TBUT, or change from baseline at any visit.Despite preservative differences, there were no significant differences in objective clinical measures of ocular surface tolerability after 3 months of treatment with bimatoprost (with 0.02% BAK), travoprost (with sofZia), and latanoprost (with 0.02% BAK).