1. Orthogonally spherical objects and spherical fibrations
- Author
-
Timothy Logvinenko and Rina Anno
- Subjects
Pure mathematics ,Derived category ,Functor ,General Mathematics ,010102 general mathematics ,14F05 (Primary), 14E99, 18E30 ,Fibered knot ,Object (computer science) ,01 natural sciences ,Mathematics - Algebraic Geometry ,If and only if ,Mathematics::Category Theory ,0103 physical sciences ,FOS: Mathematics ,010307 mathematical physics ,0101 mathematics ,QA ,Mirror symmetry ,Algebraic Geometry (math.AG) ,Mathematics - Abstract
We introduce a relative version of the spherical objects of Seidel and Thomas. Define an object E in the derived category D(Z x X) to be spherical over Z if the corresponding functor from D(Z) to D(X) gives rise to autoequivalences of D(Z) and D(X) in a certain natural way. Most known examples come from subschemes of X fibred over Z. This categorifies to the notion of an object of D(Z x X) orthogonal over Z. We prove that such an object is spherical over Z if and only if it has certain cohomological properties similar to those in the original definition of a spherical object. We then interpret this geometrically in the case when our objects are actual flat fibrations in X over Z., 29 pages; v2: A missing assumption reinstated in Prop. 3.7, some notation cleaned up. The final version to appear in Adv. in Math
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF