1. Effectiveness of a daytime rapid response system in hospitalized surgical ward patients
- Author
-
Yang, Eunjin, Lee, Hannah, Lee, Sang-Min, Kim, Sulhee, Ryu, Ho Geol, Lee, Hyun Joo, Lee, Jinwoo, and Oh, Seung-Young
- Subjects
hospital mortality ,Rapid Response System ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Do not resuscitate ,lcsh:Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid ,Retrospective cohort study ,lcsh:RC86-88.9 ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,Critical Care Nursing ,cardiopulmonary resuscitation ,Confidence interval ,Relative risk ,Emergency medicine ,patient safety ,Medicine ,Original Article ,Cardiopulmonary resuscitation ,hospital rapid response team ,business ,Survival rate ,Rapid response system ,heart arrest - Abstract
Background Clinical deteriorations during hospitalization are often preventable with a rapid response system (RRS). We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a daytime RRS for surgical hospitalized patients. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 20 general surgical wards at a 1,779-bed University hospital from August 2013 to July 2017 (August 2013 to July 2015, pre-RRS-period; August 2015 to July 2017, post-RRS-period). The primary outcome was incidence of cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) when the RRS was operating. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of total and preventable cardiopulmonary arrest, in-hospital mortality, the percentage of “do not resuscitate” orders, and the survival of discharged CPA patients. Results The relative risk (RR) of CPA per 1,000 admissions during RRS operational hours (weekdays from 7 AM to 7 PM) in the post-RRS-period compared to the pre-RRS-period was 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 1.13; P=0.099) and the RR of total CPA regardless of RRS operating hours was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.46 to 1.28; P=0.301). The preventable CPA after RRS implementation was significantly lower than that before RRS implementation (RR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.88; P=0.028). There were no statistical differences in in-hospital mortality and the survival rate of patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest. Do-not-resuscitate decisions significantly increased during after RRS implementation periods compared to pre-RRS periods (RR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.40 to 2.59; P
- Published
- 2020