Search

Metastasic priapism is a rare entity produced by tumor cell implantation or direct infiltration of corpora cavernousum of the penis. In up to 80% of cases the primary tumor has an urological origen like prostate or bladder cancers. Treatment depends on syntomatology and patient's prognosis. Generally, average survival in these patients is poor due to metastasic progression, among 1 to 1 and a half years. We present a case report of secondary priapism for direct bladder carcinoma's invasion of the corpora cavernousum. A total penectomy due to a penile infected necrosis was required.

Metastasic priapism is a rare entity produced by tumor cell implantation or direct infiltration of corpora cavernousum of the penis. In up to 80% of cases the primary tumor has an urological origen like prostate or bladder cancers. Treatment depends on syntomatology and patient's prognosis. Generally, average survival in these patients is poor due to metastasic progression, among 1 to 1 and a half years. We present a case report of secondary priapism for direct invasion of the corpora cavernousum of the penis for bladder carcinoma.

Introduction: Paratesticular tumours are rare but generally benign neoplasms, usually treated by local excission. Adenomatoid tumours of epididymis are the most common of these tumours., Objectives: Analyze paratesticular tumours treated in our center and describe dyagnosis and treatment of adenomatoid tumours of epididymis., Material and Methods: We retrospectively review 8 patients with paratesticular tumours treated from July 1997 to July 2007. We analyze clinical presentation, dyagnostic suspicion given by image technique, treatment followed and final dyagnosis., Results: Patients median age was 44.1 years (22-69), presenting most of them subacute scrotal tumour with median size by ultrasound of 2.8 cm (1.5-7). All of them were locally extirpated except one with suspicion of a malignant polyorchidism and another one with an apparently intratesticular lesion of great size. Just in two cases peroperatory biopsy was performed. Dyagnosis was in 4 cases adenomatoid tumour of epididymis, in two cases fibrous pseudotumour of epididymis, in one case leiomyoma of epididymis and in one case angiolipoma of spermatic cord. Just in one case diagnosed of adenomatoid tumour of epididymis ultrasound confirmed solid tumour suggesting the final dyagnosis., Conclusions: Adenomatoid tumors of epididymis are rare tumours which may present at any age. Ultrasound may help in dyagnosis, but its capacity to distinguish this lesions is low. Benignity of adenomatoid tumour of epididymis as well as most of the other paratesticular tumours should make local excission the treatment of choice and, when any doubt existed, peroperatory biopsy should be performed.

Introduction: To evaluate the differences between laparoscopic (LRP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP)., Material and Methods: From 2004 to 2005 180 Radical prostatectomies (RP) were performed, 105 laparoscopical and 75 by an open approach. Different urologists have acted as first surgeon; 51% of them, fully experienced ones in OPR, and 56% in LRP. Differences in operative time, estimated blood loss (difference of pre and post operative hematocrite), and duration of hospitalization were compared. Additionally, we have also analysed surgical and oncologic control of the specimen defined by the following variables: Malignant margins (MM) (positive margin in a pT3 specimen), and benign/malign surgical incision (BSI/MSI)., Results: Groups were similar concerning age, clinical stage and Gleason score, and there are only differences in PSA. Mean operative time was significantly higher in LRP (172 minutes) versus ORP (145 minutes) (p < 0.001). Difference of pre and post operative hematocrite was also higher in the open group (10.7 vs 9.2) (p = 0.03), together with hospital stay, which was one day longer in the ORP group (p = 0.001). ORP group had a higher rate of benign surgical incisions (48.7% vs 26.7%) (p = 0.001). Regarding oncologic results, LRP presented a 5.4% of positive margins, which compared significantly with a 16.9% rate in the open group (p = 0.023). However, no differences concerning malignant surgical incisions were observed., Conclusion: With no differences in clinical and pathological stage, LRP offers a significant reduction of surgical aggressiveness on the specimen, together with a better MM control. We also observe a clear decrease in blood loss and hospital stay. Therefore, we conclude that LRP in our environment is a valid approach of surgical prostate cancer treatment in spite of a longer operative time (27 minutes) and a steep learning curve.

Lymphoma involving the prostate is rare, wether presenting as primary extranodal lymphoma or as a secondary spread to the prostate from other sites. There are less than 100 cases reported in the literature and accounts for 0.09-0.1%. The clinical presentation can be attributed to nodular hyperplasia or prostatic carcinoma. Criteria for primary prostatic lymphoma include: 1) tumor limited to the prostate and adjacent soft tissues. 2) the absence of lymph node involvement. 3) a lymphoma free interval of at least 1 month. The evolution is rapid and the prognosis remains poor regardless of the patient age, histologic type, treatment, or clinical stage of disease at presentation. We report a case of a 65 years old male in which the incidental diagnosis of lymphoma of the prostate was performed in the adenomectomy. The clinico-pathological criteria and the histogenesis of this entity are described.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of routine biopsy of the transitional area in patients undergoing early systematic sextant biopsy., Patients and Methods: Two biopsies were taken from the transitional area further to a sextant biopsy in 164 consecutive patients. 98 cases had serum PSA levels higher than 4 ng/mL and 66 suspicious rectal digital examination., Results: Cancer was detected in 77 patients (46.9%). In 28 (36.4%) cases cancer was found only in the peripheral area, in 2 (2.6%) in the transitional area and in 47 (61%) in both areas., Conclusion: Routine biopsy of the transitional area in early systematic prostate biopsy appears to be little effective. This would probably be indicated for patients undergoing rebiopsy.

Objective: To analyze the incidence of pathoanatomical lesions seen in systematic prostate biopsies and to evaluate their influence on PSA serum levels., Material and Methods: 495 consecutive prostate biopsies, indicated by a suspicion digital rectal examination in 194 patients (39.2%) and raised serum PSA in 301 (60.8%), were evaluated. Biopsy was performed by sextant and hypoechoic nodes, and PSA serum measurements by dual monoclonal antibody radioimmunoassay, Tandem PSA., Results: Cancer was diagnosed in 42.6% biopsies and BPH in 67.4%; additionally, other associated lesions were detected in 74.6% cases, the most frequent ones being chronic prostatitis (47.3%), glandular atrophy (35.9%) and acute prostatitis (23%). All lesions were significantly related to the primary BPH diagnosis in 74.2% to 85% cases. High grade PIN (14.1%) was related to primary cancer diagnosis in 87.1% cases. The multivariate analysis showed that the main diagnosis (BPH vs cancer) was the only variable that had a significant influence on PSA serum levels. When BPH patients were considered separately, the only variable with significant influence on PSA serum levels was the prostatic volume. The univariate analysis showed a nonsignificant increase in association with acute prostatitis and high grade PIN, and a decrease in association with chronic prostatitis., Conclusions: BPH or cancer associated damage is very frequent in prostatic biopsies. However, the only factors showing a significant contribution to PSA serum levels appear to be the presence or absence of cancer, or the prostatic volume when the main diagnosis is BPH.

Diagnosis of prostate cancer has increased over the last few years both in localized and in more advanced stages. At present, several groups are working in the search and evaluation of alternative tumoral markers as the current ones do not cover all the Urologist's needs. In this context, a number of studies on the mutation of the tumour suppressor gen p53 in both localized and metastatic prostate cancer are being carried out. When a noxa acts on the DNA, protein p53 inhibits the cell cycle allowing the repair systems to operate and, if the damage is significant enough, cell apoptosis. The loss of this control mechanism secondary to the synthesis of anomalous proteins can result in the proliferation of neoplastic cells. A revision of the most representative papers in the literature is presented here, addressing the surrounding controversy and the resulting future possibilities.

Unlabelled: A series of 7 cases of chromophobe cell carcinoma with clinicopathological correlation is studied. The immunohistochemistry analysis was carried out evaluating in all cases: low and high cytoqueratines (AE1, AE3), membrane epithelial antigen (EMA), vimentin, carcinoembrionary antigen (CEA), proliferative cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and the oncoproteins p53 and focal c-erbB2. In all cases a diffuse positivity for EMA, AE3 and focal for AE1 was observed, while vimentin and CEA were negative. The positivity for PCNA was always less than 25% of tumoral cells. The oncoprotein p53 was in all cases negative and only in one case a mild and focal positivity for c-erbB2 was observed., Conclusions: 1) The negativity for vimentin and positivity for EMA, AE1 and AE3 allows to differentiate this carcinoma from clear cell carcinoma. This corroborate a distinct histogenesis, thus suggesting their origin in the intercalar cells of distal collector tubules. 2) The low values of PCNA and the negativity for both oncoproteins p53 and c-erbB2 supports the low aggresivity of this tumor and a better prognostic than other types of kidney carcinomas.

Presentation of two cases of Leydig cell tumor in adult patients who presented with gynecomastia, and slightly abnormal hormonal profiles. One patient had a non palpable tumor. The pathophysiology of this entity is commented, as well as the importance of the different modalities in its diagnosis.