Search

The commercially available coated tablets containing either racemic form of ofloxacin (Tarivid 200 mg, OfloHexal 200 mg and Ofloxacin-Ratiopharm 200 mg) or only levofloxacin S-(-)-isomer (Tavanic 250 mg) were examined. The aim of our study was to establish the kinetics of dissolution rate process of ofloxacin optical isomers (S-(-) and R-(+)-ofloxacin) from solid oral dosage forms using flow-through cell method (USP 4 method). The concentrations of analytes (racemic ofloxacin and its enantiomers) in the samples of tablet extracts as well as in dissolution media (0.1 M/L HCl and phosphate buffer pH 6.8) were determined by validated high performance capillary electrophoresis method. The fraction of the average dose of the individual optical isomers of ofloxacin released from the examined tablets was calculated. In the case of the OfloHexal, Ofloxacin-Ratiopharm and Tavanic it was found to be around 100% for both S-(-) and R-(+)-ofloxacin in 0.1 M/L HCI after 30 min of dissolution test. The fraction of the average dose for the Tarivid tablets was approximately 50% at the same time. A similar results were observed for the Ofloxacin-Ratiopharm and Tavanic tablets examined in phosphate buffer (average fraction about 100% after 30 min), while in the case of Tarivid and OfloHexal the averige fraction of the dose determined in a buffer pH 6.8 was 14% and 44%, respectively. There were not found any differences in the kinetics of dissolution of the S-(-)-ofloxacin and R-(+)-ofloxacin isomers within the same formulation. However, statistically significant differences were found in the dissolution of ofloxacin enantiomers between different preparations.

Resistance to an anti-platelet agent clopidogrel (CLP) and the growing number of products with the drug cause the need for comparison of their quality to assure patients safe and effective treatment. Therefore, the aim of the study was to compare in vitro dissolution kinetics of CLP immediate-release tablets, commonly used in anti-platelet therapy in Poland. For analysis of CLP in samples obtained from dissolution test a capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) method was elaborated and validated. Separation of CLP and ticlopidine, used as an internal standard, was performed in silica capillary filled with phosphate buffer of pH 2.5, at the applied voltage of 20 kV. The CZE method fulfilled the validation requirements for determination of drugs in pharmaceutical matrices and was successfully applied for analysis of CLP dissolved from the tablets. Dissolution profiles were prepared for each product and mean dose fractions of CLP dissolved from tablets at 30 min were calculated. Kinetic parameters of the CLP dissolution from the studied products were compared. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) did not reveal differences between CLP fractions dissolved at 30 min time point from the tested drug products. However, ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparison test revealed significant differences in first-order dissolution rate constants and t₀.₅ values (times at which 50% of drug is dissolved) of CLP among tested tablets. It was concluded that the studied CLP products met the acceptance criteria regarding dissolution test but differed with each other in dissolution kinetics.