Search

Whether SARS-CoV-2 accelerates diabetes in a genetically predisposed child with ongoing pancreatic autoimmunity or triggers new-onset diabetes in a child who may have progressed to clinically overt T1DM later, or not at all, if they had not been infected by SARS-CoV-2 is not known. What does SARS-CoV-2 tell us about the aetiology of environmental triggers for diabetes in children and young people? Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is caused by the autoimmune destruction of cells in the pancreatic islets and accounts for over 90% of childhood diabetes. [Extracted from the article]

Aim: Triage is key to effective management of major incidents, yet there is scarce evidence surrounding the optimal method of paediatric major incident triage (MIT). This study aimed to derive consensus on key components of paediatric MIT among healthcare professionals responsible for triage during paediatric major incidents. Methods: Two‐round online Delphi consensus study delivered July 2021–October 2021, including participants from pre‐hospital and hospital specialities responsible for triage during paediatric major incidents. A 5‐point Likert scale was used to determine consensus, set a priori at 70%. Results: 111 clinicians completed both rounds; 13 of 17 statements reached consensus. Positive consensus was reached on rescue breaths in mechanisms associated with hypoxia or asphyxiation, mobility assessment as a crude discriminator and use of adult physiology for older children. Whilst positive consensus was reached on the benefits of a single MIT tool across all adult and paediatric age ranges, there was negative consensus in relation to clinical implementation. Conclusions: This Delphi study has established consensus among a large group of clinicians involved in the management of major incidents on several key elements of paediatric major incident triage. Further work is required to develop a triage tool that can be implemented based on emerging and ongoing research and which is acceptable to clinicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Attendances to emergency departments (EDs) in the UK are increasing, particularly for younger children. Community services are under increasing pressure and parents may preferentially bring their babies to the ED, even for non-urgent problems. This study aimed to characterise the presenting features, management and disposition of neonatal attendances to a children's ED (CED).Methods: Retrospective observational review of neonatal attendances (≤28 days) to the CED at Bristol Royal Hospital for Children (BRHC) from 01/01/2016 to 31/12/2016. Further information was obtained from investigation results and discharge summaries. Data abstracted included sex, age, referral method, presenting complaint, diagnosis, investigations and treatments.Results: Neonatal attendances increased from 655 to 1,205 from 2008 to 2016. The most common presenting complaints were breathing difficulty (18.1%) and vomiting (8.3%). The most common diagnoses were 'no significant medical problem' (41.9%) and bronchiolitis (10.5%). Half of neonatal attendances to the CED had no investigations performed and most (77.7%) needed advice or observation only.Conclusion: Many neonates presenting to the CED were well and discharged with observation only. This suggests potential for improving community management and in supporting new parents. Drivers of health policy should consider developing enhanced models of out of hospital care which are acceptable to clinicians and families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]