Search

Background and Purpose: Perioperative 5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) is recommended in resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma based on randomised trials. However, the effectiveness of FLOT in routine clinical practice remains unknown as randomised trials are subject to selection bias limiting their generalisability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of FLOT in real-world patients., Methods: Retrospectively collected data were analysed in consecutive patients treated before or after the implementation of FLOT. The primary endpoint was complete pathological response (pCR) and secondary endpoints were margin-free resection (R0), overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) tolerability of chemotherapy and surgical complications., Results: Mean follow-up time for patients treated with FLOT (n = 205) was 37.7 versus 47.0 months for epirubicin, cis- or oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (ECX/EOX, n = 186). Surgical resection was performed in 88.0% versus 92.0%; pCR were observed in 3.8% versus 2.4%; and R0 resections were achieved in 78.0% versus 86.0% (p = 0.03) in the ECX/EOX and FLOT cohorts, respectively. Survival analysis indicated no significant difference in RFS (p = 0.17) or OS (p = 0.37) between the cohorts with a trend towards increased OS in performance status 0 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-1.04). More patients treated with ECX/EOX completed chemotherapy (39% vs. 28%, p = 0.02). Febrile neutropenia was more common in the FLOT cohort (3.8% vs. 11%, p = 0.0086). 90-days mortality (1.2% vs. 0%) and frequency of anastomotic leakage (8% vs. 6%) were equal and low., Interpretation: Patients receiving FLOT did not demonstrate improved pCR, RFS or OS. However, R0 rate was improved and patients in good PS trended towards improved OS.

Background: Decisions regarding tumor staging, operability, resectability, and treatment strategy in patients with esophageal cancer are made at multidisciplinary team (MDT) conferences. We aimed to assess interobserver agreement from four national MDT conferences and whether this would have a clinical impact., Methods: A total of 20 patients with esophageal cancer were included across all four upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer centers. Fully anonymized patient data were distributed among the MDT conferences which decided on TNM category, resectability, operability, curability, and treatment strategy blinded to each other's decisions. The interobserver agreement was expressed as both the raw observer agreement and with Krippendorff's α values. Finally, a case-by-case evaluation was performed to determine if disagreement would have had a clinical impact., Results: A total of 80 MDT evaluations were available for analysis. A moderate to near-perfect observer agreement of 79.2%, 55.8%, and 82.5% for TNM category was observed, respectively. Substantial agreement for resectability and moderate agreement for curability were found. However, an only fair agreement was observed for the operability category. The treatment strategies had a slight agreement which corresponded to disagreement having a clinical impact in 12 patients., Conclusions: Esophageal cancer MDT conferences had an acceptable interobserver agreement on resectability and TM categories; however, the operability assessment had a high level of disagreement. Consequently, the agreement on treatment strategy was reduced with a potential clinical impact. In future MDT conferences, emphasis should be on prioritizing the relevant information being readily available (operability, T & M categories) to minimize the risk of disagreement in the assessments and treatment strategies, and thus, delayed or suboptimal treatment.

Background: No preferred first-line chemotherapy regimen exists for advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Addition of docetaxel to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) has been shown to improve survival but is associated with increased toxicity. In this randomized, non-comparative phase 2 trial, we tested carboplatin, docetaxel, and capecitabine (CTX), a potentially useful modification of DCF (NCT02177552)., Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced HER2-negative esophagogastric adenocarcinoma not previously treated in the first-line setting were randomized to intravenous docetaxel 60 mg/m 2 and carboplatin AUC5 plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m 2 bd days 1-14, q4w (CTX) or intravenous epirubicin 50 mg/m 2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m 2 on day 1 plus oral capecitabine 625 mg/m 2 bd days 1-21, q3w (epirubicin, oxaliplatin and capecitabine [EOX]). Treatment continued until progression, intolerance or for a maximum of nine cycles. The primary endpoint was 1-year survival for patients treated with CTX., Results: Between June 2014 and January 2019, a total of 98 eligible patients were randomized. The 1-year survival rate was 34.7% (95% CI 21.8 - 47.9) with CTX and 36.7% (95% CI 23.6 - 50.0) with EOX. Progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.1 months (95% CI 5.5 - 7.1) and 9.8 months (95% CI 8.2 - 11.0) with CTX and 5.1 months (95% CI 4.3 - 7.0) and 10.2 months (95% CI 8.0 - 11.9) with EOX, respectively. Related grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 86% of patients on CTX and 69% on EOX. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 31.4% of patients on CTX and 13.7% on EOX., Conclusions: First-line CTX showed insufficient efficacy and caused a high rate of febrile neutropenia. CTX could not, therefore, be recommended for further study. This trial adds to current knowledge of docetaxel combined with platinum and 5-FU: that the combination is associated with increased toxicity and its use should be limited to fit patients in need of a response.

Background: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been associated with prognosis in esophageal cancer, suggesting a role for miRNAs to help guide treatment decisions. Especially, miR-21 and miR-375 have been investigated as prognostic biomarkers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic potential of miR-21 and miR-375 in primary esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC) and esophagogastric adenocarcinomas (EAC)., Material and Methods: Pre-therapeutic tumor specimens from 195 patients with loco-regional esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant or definitive chemoradiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy were analyzed. Expression levels of miR-21 and miR-375 were quantified using Affymetrix GeneChip miRNA 1.0 Array. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the correlation of miR-21 and miR-375 with disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). Forest plots were performed to evaluate the prognostic impact of miR-21 and miR-375 in the present study and previously published reports., Results: In ESCC, patients with miR-21 expression levels above median showed a trend towards poorer DSS and OS. When dividing miR-21 expression by tertiles, high levels of miR-21 significantly correlated with shortened DSS [HR 1.76 (95% CI 1.05-2.97) but not OS. Similarly for EAC, a significant association between miR-21 expression above median and DSS was observed [HR 3.37 (95% CI 1.41-8.05)], in addition to a trend towards poorer OS for patients with miR-21 expression above median. Multivariate analyses identified miR-21 as an independent prognostic marker for DSS in EAC [HR 3.52 (95% CI 1.06-11.69)]. High miR-375 was not correlated with improved prognosis in either histology. However, Forest plots demonstrated that both miR-21 and miR-375 were of prognostic impact in ESCC., Conclusion: In this study, miR-21 was identified as an independent prognostic biomarker for DSS in patients with EAC whereas miR-21 failed to show independent prognostic significance in ESCC. High miR-375 was not associated with enhanced survival in either histology.