Search

The outcome of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) years after onset is largely unknown. The objective of our study was to describe our clinical experience and long-term outcomes in a case series of patients with SIH. From March 2007 to March 2022, demographic variables, clinical symptoms, neuroimaging findings, and response to treatment were retrospectively analyzed in patients with confirmed SIH and in a subgroup of patients with clinical symptoms but not confirmed by MR or LP, probable SIH (pSIH). We have included 37 SIH and 13 pSIH patients. The average age at onset was 44 years, and 59% (pSIH 46%) were women. All patients presented with a new-onset orthostatic headache. In the SIH group, brain MRI showed signs of intracranial hypotension in all patients, spinal MR was performed in 70%, and pathological findings were identified in 73%. The range of EBP was 1-8 (average 2.2). Good outcome after single or 2 EBPs had 42% (pSIH 46%) of patients. At follow-up, 81% (pSIH 54%) of patients had a favorable outcome. Relapse occurred in 16% of patients in the SIH group and none in the pSIH group. The mean follow-up time was 60 months. EBP is an effective and minimally invasive treatment, and efficacy seems independent of disease duration. The long-term prognosis is favorable in 80% of SIH patients and in half of pSIH patients. Despite the lack of MRI signs of low intracranial pressure on neuroimaging, pSIH patients should also be offered EBP, and more awareness of SIH is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Small subsets of patients who fail to respond to pharmacological treatment may benefit from alternative treatment methods. In the last decade, neurostimulation is being explored as a potential treatment option for the patients with chronic, severely disabling refractory primary headaches. To alleviate pain, specific nerves and brain areas have been stimulated, and various methods have been explored: deep brain stimulation, occipital nerve stimulation, and sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation are among the more invasive ones, whereas transcranial magnetic stimulation and supraorbital nerve stimulation are noninvasive. Vagal nerve stimulation can be invasive or noninvasive, though this review included only data for noninvasive VNS. Most of these methods have been tested in small open‐label patient series; recently, more data from randomized, controlled, and blinded studies are available. Although neurostimulation treatments have demonstrated good efficacy in many studies, it still has not been established as a standard treatment in refractory patients. This review analyzes the available evidence regarding efficacy and safety of different neurostimulation modalities for the treatment of chronic migraine and cluster headache. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]