Search

Extensive craniocervical pneumatization (CCP) refers to an abnormal pneumatization extended from the temporal bone into adjacent bone structures, especially the skull base and the craniocervical junction. The etiology remains controversial; however several studies reported a correlation with recurrent Valsalva maneuvers or Eustachian tube dysfunction. Although some cases requiring surgical treatment have been reported, conservative treatment remains the gold standard. The authors aimed to describe a case of CCP, complicated by a spontaneous fracture of a pneumatized left occipital condyle. Furthermore, they reviewed all previously reported cases of fractures in CCP in order to propose a standardized approach to this pathology. A total of 148 studies were retrieved. Of those, 23 studies (including 26 patients in addition to our case) were included in the review. These studies consisted of case reports or small case series (up to 3 patients). In 3 patients (11.1%), bone pneumatization involved C0; all remaining patients had both C0 and C1 pneumatization, while in 7 cases (25.9%), an extension to C2 and/or C3 was reported. Radiological follow-up was performed in 20 patients (74.1%), showing in all of the cases either stability (6 patients, 22.2%), improvement, or complete resolution (6 patients, 22.2% vs 8 patients, 29.7%). Two patients underwent surgical intervention. This review suggests that fractures secondary to CCP are extremely rare and are associated to a good clinical and radiological outcome with conservative treatment. Ear, nose, and throat (ENT) evaluation is recommended to detect cases who need treatment for a subjacent middle ear disease.

First introduced by Pimenta et al. in 2001, the extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF®) approach is a safe and effective alternative to anterior or posterior approaches to lumbar fusion, avoiding the large anterior vessels and posterior structures including the paraspinous muscles, facet joint complexes and tension bands. The authors provide a detailed description of the surgically relevant anatomy focusing on the close relationship among the lumbar plexus, psoas muscle and lateral spinal column. The surgical technique is detailed step by step, stressing how to avoid complications. A video clip of an XLIF is provided, and important perioperative considerations are listed in detail. The XLIF® approach is a safe procedure allowing an approach to the lateral lumbar spine. Nevertheless, the surgeon’s knowledge of anatomical landmarks, response to visual and tactile cues, and intraoperative decision-making skills remain of paramount importance. • Correct lateral positioning with an orthogonal orientation of the corresponding lumbar vertebral body is of key importance. • Subsequent table repositioning for every level is advised in multilevel cases. • Posterior structures including the paraspinous muscles, facet joint complexes and tension bands are mostly preserved. • Meticulous preoperative planning of the psoas docking point, considering all level-specific vascular and neuronal elements, is of paramount importance. • In general, concavity is recommended for the selection of the approach side. • A careful endplate and contralateral preparation and release are mandatory in order to allow bony fusion and maximum indirect foraminal decompression. • Using a perioperative dexamethasone bolus seems to be effective at the L4/5 level to reduce postoperative plexopathy. • Overdistraction should be avoided in order to prevent cage subsidence. • A major disadvantage is the relatively high, but mostly only transient, incidence of psoas weakness as well as hip-groin-thigh pain, dysaesthesia and/or numbness. • Major advantages include indirect neurological decompression, minimal blood loss, shorter operation times, decreased overall infection rates and more surface for bony fusion.

Background: Although it is generally accepted that incidental durotomies (ID) should be primarily repaired, the current literature shows no consensus regarding the peri- and postoperative management in case of ID during lumbar spine surgery. Because ID is a rather frequent complication and may be associated with significant disability, we were interested to analyze the current handling of ID in three European countries. Methods: In March 2014, members of the Swiss, German, and Austrian neurosurgical and spine societies were asked to complete an online questionnaire regarding the management of ID during and after lumbar spine surgery. Two, respectively 4weeks after the first invitation, reminder requests were sent to all invitees, who had not already responded at that time. Results: There were 175 responses from 397 requests (44.1%). Responders were predominantly neurosurgeons (89.7%; 10.3% were orthopedic surgeons), of which 45.7, 40.0, and 17.8% work in a non-university hospital, university hospital, and private clinic, respectively. As for the perioperative management of ID, 19.4% of the responders suggest only bed rest, while, depending on the extent of the ID, 84.0% suggest additional actions, TachoSil/Spongostan with fibrin glue or a similar product and single suture repair being the most mentioned. Concerning epidural wound drainage in case of ID, 37.2% desist from placing an epidural wound drainage with or without aspiration, 30.9% place it sometimes, and 33.7% place it regularly, but only without aspiration. Most responders prescribe bed rest for 24 (34.9%) or 48h (28.0%), with much fewer prescribing bed rest for 72h (6.3%) and none more than 72h, and 14.9% of participants never prescribe bed rest. The vast majority of physicians (82.9%, n = 145) always inform their patients after the operation in case of ID. Conclusions: There is substantial heterogeneity in the management of incidental durotomies. The majority of spine surgeons today aim at complete/sufficient primary repair of the ID with varying recommendations concerning postoperative bed rest. Still, there is a trend towards early mobilization if the incidental durotomy has been closed completely/sufficiently with no participant favoring bed rest for more than 72h.

Background: The C1 lateral mass and C2 isthmic stabilization, as introduced by Goel and Laheri and by Harms and Melcher, is a well-known fixation technique. We present the clinical and radiographic results with freehand fluoroscopy guided C1 lateral mass and C2 isthmic fixation in a consecutive series of 28 patients, evaluating the accuracy of screw placement. Methods: Twenty-eight consecutive patients suffering from post-traumatic and other C1-C2 instability were operated on between 2001 and 2010. Indications for surgery were: trauma (n = 21 cases), os odontoideum (n = 1), cranio-verterbal malformation (n = 1), and arthritis (n = 3) and idiopathic instability (n = 2). C1 lateral mass and C2 isthmic screws were placed according to the usual anatomical landmarks with lateral fluoroscopy guidance. All patients underwent a postoperative CT scan. The extent of cortical lateral or medial breach was determined and classified as follows: no breach (grade A), 0-2mm (grade B), 2-4mm (grade C), 4-6mm (grade D), more than 6mm (grade E). Grade A and B screws were considered well positioned. Results: A total of 56C1 lateral mass and 55C2 isthmic screws were placed. Accuracy of screw placement was as follows: 107 grade A (96.4%), four grade B (3.6%), and no grade C, D or E. Clinical and radiological follow-up showed improvement in symptoms (mainly pain) and stability of the implants at the end of the follow-up. Conclusions: Freehand fluoroscopy-guided insertion of C1 lateral mass and C2 isthmic screws can be safely and effectively performed

Background: We report our surgical experience in the treatment of fifteen consecutive patients with benign craniovertebral junction tumors, observed from 1993 to 2000 at our department. Method: We treated 7 meningiomas, 3 epidermoids, 3 C1 neurinomas and 2 neurinomas of the lower cranial nerves. Clinical results were evaluated by Karnofsky Performance Scale and all patients underwent preoperative neuroradiological evaluation with CT, MRI and MRA; angiography was not routinely performed and was considered for each individual case. Findings: 11 partial transcondilar and 4 retrocondilar approaches were performed. Total removal was achieved in 11 cases (73,3%) and subtotal removal in 4 patients (26,7%). None of the patients required occipitocervical fusion. Patients were followed for an average period of 24±31 months. Clinical and radiological follow-up showed no recurrence in cases with total removal. In all patients a statistically significant postoperative increase of KPS scores was recorded. The treatment of epidermoid tumors presented particular issues: debulking the lesion, we obtained a surgical window, avoiding a large removal of bone. In Nakasu grade 1 or 2 meningiomas, we carried out total removal by piecemeal resection and without complete condylectomy and bone fixation. Interpretation: The choice of these approaches and the extent of bone resection should be defined according to the tumor's location and size. Moreover we emphasize that preoperative neuroradiological evaluations on presumptive tumor type could be helpful to the surgeon in order to tailor the technique to different lesions, providing the required exposure, without unnecessary surgical steps.

Korrektur zu 10.1007/s00701-013-1956-x