Search

Introduction: The treatment of spinal chordomas presents a significant challenge due to their resistance to both radiotherapy and chemotherapy as well as the complexity of the surgical procedures required. This study presents a series of cases of primary spinal chordomas, focusing on the development of a personalized therapeutic strategy that is tailored to each patient's unique clinical status. This approach aims to ensure that treatments are optimally aligned with the patient's overall prognosis and surgical eligibility. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 14 patients with primary spinal chordomas treated at our institution. We evaluated surgical strategies, clinical outcomes, and survival rates, The therapeutic strategy was formulated after interdisciplinary conferences with sarcoma management specialists. Data were collected on patient demographics, surgical details, postoperative outcomes, and follow-up status. Results: All patients presented with neurological deficits preoperatively, which generally improved post-surgery. The study included a detailed analysis of two distinct surgical approaches: five patients underwent en bloc resection with dorsal stabilization and nine received decompression only. Patients undergoing en bloc resection showed a reduced need for additional surgery due to the comprehensive removal of the tumor. As anticipated, 40% of the patients who underwent decompression experienced tumor progression within the first three months. However, given the poor overall prognosis, the objective of maintaining neurological function was achieved. Conclusions: Surgical en bloc resection offers a viable and effective intervention for spinal chordomas, enhancing neurological function. It is imperative to tailor treatment strategies to individual prognoses, integrating insights from multidisciplinary discussions that meticulously evaluate surgical risks. This collaborative approach aids in selecting the most appropriate surgical technique tailored to each patient's specific condition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The management of spinal sarcomas is complex, given their widespread involvement and high recurrence rates. Despite consensus on the need for a multidisciplinary approach with surgery at its core, there is a lack of definitive guidelines for clinical decision-making. This study examines a case series of primary spinal sarcomas, focusing on the surgical strategies, clinical results, and survival data to inform and guide therapeutic practices. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent surgical resection for primary spinal sarcomas between 2005 and 2022. The study focused on gathering data on patient demographics, surgical details, postoperative complications, overall hospital stay, and mortality within 90 days post-surgery. Results: The study included 14 patients with a primary diagnosis of spinal sarcoma, with an average age of 48.6 ± 12.6 years. Chondrosarcoma emerged as the most common tumor type, representing 57.1% of cases, followed by Ewing sarcoma at 35.7%, and synovial sarcoma at 7.1%. Patients with chondrosarcoma were treated with en-bloc resection, while the patient with synovial sarcoma underwent intra-lesional excision and those with Ewing sarcoma received decompression and tumor debulking. Postoperative assessments revealed significant improvements in neurological conditions. Notably, functional status as measured by the Karnofski Performance Index (KPI), improved substantially post-surgery (from 61.4 to 80.0%) The mean follow-up was 34.9 ± 9.2 months. During this time period one patient experienced fatal bleeding after en-bloc resection complications involving the vena cava. None of the patient needed further surgery. Conclusions: Our 16-year study offers vital insights into managing primary spinal sarcomas, showcasing the effectiveness of surgical intervention, particularly en-bloc resection. Despite their rarity and complexity, our multidisciplinary treatment approach yields improved outcomes and highlights the potential for refined surgical strategies to become standardized care in this challenging domain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]