Search

Background: The association between high-risk serotypes of human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) and cervical cancer is well-established., Summary: In order to improve the sensitivity of cervical cytology testing, hr-HPV testing has rapidly become part of routine cervical cancer screening, either in conjunction with cytology or as primary testing. In this review, we discuss the overall utility and strategies of hr-HPV testing, as well as the advantages and limitations of potential triage strategies for hr-HPV-positive women, including HPV genotyping, p16/Ki-67 dual staining, and methylation assays., Key Message: hr-HPV testing is discussed as primary screening and HPV genotyping, p16/Ki-67 dual staining, and methylation assays are discussed as ancillary techniques to cytology in the triage of hr-HPV-positive women undergoing cervical cancer screening., (© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Evaluation of peritoneal fluid cytology, either from ascitic fluids or as a result of peritoneal washings, is a fundamental aspect in the evaluation of women presenting with clinically concerning or histologically confirmed gynecologic neoplasms., Summary: Ascitic fluid samples are often the initial and only source of diagnostic material in women presenting with gynecologic malignancies, and important therapeutic decisions will result from the information provided in the cytology report. On the other hand, cytologic evaluation of peritoneal washing specimens obtained during surgical excision of a presumed gynecologic neoplasm provides crucial information to the clinical team regarding tumor staging, often with significant therapeutic implications. While recognition of high-grade tumors in either of these samples is generally straightforward, low-grade tumors and unusual neoplasms can prove to be more difficult to recognize, differentiate from benign mimics, and correctly diagnose, particularly in low-cellularity specimens. Even with high-grade tumors, a mere diagnosis of "positive for malignancy" in diagnostic ascitic fluid specimens might not suffice to guide clinical management, and the use of ancillary techniques to further and more definitively characterize the lesional cells is required., Key Messages: This review will focus on the clinically relevant issues surrounding interpretation of peritoneal fluid cytology specimens in the setting of gynecologic neoplasms, making emphasis on the salient cytomorphologic and immunocytochemical features of the various neoplastic processes, in an attempt to provide a practical yet effective guide on how to best evaluate, diagnose, and report these samples., (© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of renal masses can distinguish between benign and malignant neoplasms in 73-94% of cases. Previous studies suggested the correct subclassification of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) by cytomorphology can be achieved in up to 80% of cases. However, as RCCs become increasingly subclassified by molecular signatures, correct subclassification based on cytology alone is increasingly difficult., Design: Two FNA passes (2 stained with Diff-Quik® and 2 with the Papanicolaou method) were performed on all fresh nephrectomy specimens for a 1-year period. There were 30 cases in this study, with 29 primary renal tumors and 1 case of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Each case was assigned a random number and came with 2 slides (1 from each staining method). Eight cytopathologists were asked to provide a diagnosis and the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) grading if applicable. Fleiss' Kappa and Cohen's Kappa equations were used to look at inter-rater variability., Results: When compared to the surgical pathology diagnosis, the average percent correct diagnosis for all cytopathologist was 35%. Chromophobe RCCs had the best average percent accuracy at 72% followed by clearcell RCC at 48%. Average accuracy for grading RCCs was 40%. Inter-rater variability among the cytopathologists for all RCC diagnoses was fair with a Fleiss' Kappa coefficient of 0.28. For the WHO/ISUP grade, the weighted coefficient for each pathologist ranged from 0.11 to 0.45, ranging from fair to moderate, respectively., Conclusions: Renal tumors are difficult to classify on cytopathology alone. Core needle biopsy and ancillary studies are necessary if diagnosis will change management., (© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

The association between high-risk genotypes of human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) and cervical cancer is well established. As hr-HPV testing is rapidly becoming a part of routine cervical cancer screening, either in conjunction with cytology or as primary testing, the management of hr-HPV-positive women has to be tailored in a way that increases the detection of cervical abnormalities while decreasing unnecessary colposcopic biopsies or other invasive procedures. In this review, we discuss the overall utility and strategies of hr-HPV testing, as well as the advantages and limitations of potential triage strategies for hr-HPV-positive women, including HPV genotyping, p16/Ki-67 dual staining, and methylation assays., (© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.)