1. Witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest- effects of emergency dispatch recognition
- Author
-
Markku Kuisma, Ari Uusaro, Sakari Syväoja, Helena Jäntti, and Ari Salo
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Emergency Medical Services ,medicine.medical_treatment ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Return of spontaneous circulation ,Out of hospital cardiac arrest ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Emergency medical services ,Chain of survival ,Medicine ,Humans ,Cardiopulmonary resuscitation ,Aged ,business.industry ,Communication ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,University hospital ,EMS response ,medicine.disease ,Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,Emergency medicine ,Ventricular fibrillation ,Practice Guidelines as Topic ,Female ,business ,Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - Abstract
Background Survival from an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) depends on the sequence of interventions in "the chain of survival". If OHCA is recognized in the emergency medical communication centre (EMCC), the proper emergency medical service (EMS) should be dispatched and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instructions should be given to a bystander. The study aimed to examine the impact of OHCA recognition in the EMCC on survival rates and the main elements of the chain of survival. Methods Data from the Helsinki University Hospital's registry of OHCA patients between 1997 and 2013 were studied. Altogether, 2054 EMCC-handled and bystander-witnessed OHCA proven events of cardiac origin were analysed. Results In 80.5% of the victims, two EMS units were correctly dispatched and the OHCA was classified as recognized. Achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to hospital discharge were 49% and 23%, respectively, if cardiac arrest was recognized by the EMCC and 40% and 16% when it was not (P = 0.003 and 0.002). Dispatchers gave CPR instructions in 60% of the recognized OHCA cases. Bystander-performed CPR increased over time and was given in 58% of the recognized OHCAs and also in 17% of the unrecognized events. EMS delays were shorter if OHCA was recognized as opposed to unrecognized (8 min with an IQR 6.5-10 min vs. 9 min with an IQR 6.5-11 min; P = 0.001). Conclusions Recognition of OHCA by the EMCC was significantly associated with an increased rate of bystander-performed CPR, reduced EMS response time, and increased OHCA patient ROSC and survival rates.
- Published
- 2017