Search

Nitrogenase is a complicated two-component enzyme system that uses ATP binding and hydrolysis energy to achieve one of the most difficult chemical reactions in nature, the reduction of N 2 to NH 3 . One component of the Mo-based nitrogenase system, Fe protein, delivers electrons one at a time to the second component, the catalytic MoFe protein. This process occurs through a series of synchronized events collectively called the "Fe protein cycle". Elucidating details of the events associated with this cycle has constituted an important challenge in understanding the nitrogenase mechanism. Electron delivery is a multistep process involving three metal clusters with intra- and interprotein events. It is proposed that the first electron transfer event is a gated intraprotein transfer of one electron from the MoFe protein P-cluster to the FeMo cofactor. Measurement of the effect of osmotic pressure on the rate of this electron transfer process revealed that it is gated by protein conformational changes. This first electron transfer is activated by binding of the Fe protein containing two bound ATP molecules. The mechanism of how this protein-protein association triggers electron transfer remains unknown. The second electron transfer event is proposed to be a rapid interprotein "backfill" with transfer of one electron from the reduced Fe protein 4Fe-4S cluster to the oxidized P-cluster. In this way, electron delivery can be viewed as a case of "deficit spending". Such a deficit-spending electron transfer process can be envisioned as a way to achieve one-direction electron flow, limiting the potential for back electron flow. Hydrolysis of two ATP molecules associated with the Fe protein occurs after the electron transfer and therefore is not used to directly drive the electron transfer. Rather, ATP hydrolysis is proposed to contribute to relaxation of the "activated" conformational state associated with the ATP form of the complex, with the free energy from ATP hydrolysis being used to pay back energy associated with component protein association and electron transfer. Release of inorganic phosphate (Pi) and protein-protein dissociation follow electron transfer and ATP hydrolysis. The rate-limiting step for the Fe protein cycle is not dissociation of the two proteins, as previously believed, but rather is release of Pi after ATP hydrolysis, which is then followed by rapid protein-protein complex dissociation. Nitrogenase is composed of two catalytic halves that do not function independently but rather exhibit anticooperative nuclear motion in which electron transfer in one-half of the complex partially inhibits electron transfer and ATP hydrolysis in the other half. Calculations indicated the existence of anticooperative interactions across the entire nitrogenase complex, suggesting a mechanism for the control of events on opposite ends of this large complex. The mechanistic necessity for this anticooperative process remains unknown. This Account presents a working model for how all of these processes work together in the nitrogenase "machine" to transduce the energy from ATP binding and hydrolysis to drive N 2 reduction.

Biological nitrogen fixation, the reduction of N(2) to two NH(3) molecules, supports more than half the human population. The predominant form of the enzyme nitrogenase, which catalyzes this reaction, comprises an electron-delivery Fe protein and a catalytic MoFe protein. Although nitrogenase has been studied extensively, the catalytic mechanism has remained unknown. At a minimum, a mechanism must identify and characterize each intermediate formed during catalysis and embed these intermediates within a kinetic framework that explains their dynamic interconversion. The Lowe-Thorneley (LT) model describes nitrogenase kinetics and provides rate constants for transformations among intermediates (denoted E(n), where n is the number of electrons (and protons), that have accumulated within the MoFe protein). Until recently, however, research on purified nitrogenase had not characterized any E(n) state beyond E(0). In this Account, we summarize the recent characterization of three freeze-trapped intermediate states formed during nitrogenase catalysis and place them within the LT kinetic scheme. First we discuss the key E(4) state, which is primed for N(2) binding and reduction and which we refer to as the "Janus intermediate" because it lies halfway through the reaction cycle. This state has accumulated four reducing equivalents stored as two [Fe-H-Fe] bridging hydrides bound to the active-site iron-molybdenum cofactor ([7Fe-9S-Mo-C-homocitrate]; FeMo-co) at its resting oxidation level. The other two trapped intermediates contain reduced forms of N(2). One, intermediate, designated I, has S = 1/2 FeMo-co. Electron nuclear double resonance/hyperfine sublevel correlation (ENDOR/HYSCORE) measurements indicate that I is the final catalytic state, E(8), with NH(3) product bound to FeMo-co at its resting redox level. The other characterized intermediate, designated H, has integer-spin FeMo-co (non-Kramers; S ≥ 2). Electron spin echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) measurements indicate that H contains the [-NH(2)] fragment bound to FeMo-co and therefore corresponds to E(7). These assignments in the context of previous studies imply a pathway in which (i) N(2) binds at E(4) with liberation of H(2), (ii) N(2) is promptly reduced to N(2)H(2), (iii) the two N's are reduced in two steps to form hydrazine-bound FeMo-co, and (iv) two NH(3) are liberated in two further steps of reduction. This proposal identifies nitrogenase as following a "prompt-alternating (P-A)" reaction pathway and unifies the catalytic pathway with the LT kinetic framework. However, the proposal does not incorporate one of the most puzzling aspects of nitrogenase catalysis: obligatory generation of H(2) upon N(2) binding that apparently "wastes" two reducing equivalents and thus 25% of the total energy supplied by the hydrolysis of ATP. Because E(4) stores its four accumulated reducing equivalents as two bridging hydrides, we propose an answer to this puzzle based on the organometallic chemistry of hydrides and dihydrogen. We propose that H(2) release upon N(2) binding involves reductive elimination of two hydrides to yield N(2) bound to doubly reduced FeMo-co. Delivery of the two available electrons and two activating protons yields cofactor-bound diazene, in agreement with the P-A scheme. This keystone completes a draft mechanism for nitrogenase that both organizes the vast body of data on which it is founded and serves as a basis for future experiments.

"Nitrogen fixation", the reduction of dinitrogen (N2) to two ammonia (NH3) molecules, by the Mo-dependent nitrogenase is essential for all life. Despite four decades of research, a daunting number of unanswered questions about the mechanism of nitrogenase activity make it the "Everest of enzymes". This Account describes our efforts to climb one "face" of this mountain by meeting two interdependent challenges central to determining the mechanism of biological N2 reduction. The first challenge is to determine the reaction pathway: the composition and structure of each of the substrate-derived moieties bound to the catalytic FeMo cofactor (FeMo-co) of the molybdenum-iron (MoFe) protein of nitrogenase. To overcome this challenge, it is necessary to discriminate between the two classes of potential reaction pathways: (1) a "distal" (D) pathway, in which H atoms add sequentially at a single N or (2) an "alternating" (A) pathway, in which H atoms add alternately to the two N atoms of N2. Second, it is necessary to characterize the dynamics of conversion among intermediates within the accepted Lowe-Thorneley kinetic scheme for N2 reduction. That goal requires an experimental determination of the number of electrons and protons delivered to the MoFe protein as well as their "inventory", a partition into those residing on each of the reaction components and released as H2 or NH3. The principal obstacle to this "climb" has been the inability to generate N2 reduction intermediates for characterization. A combination of genetic, biochemical, and spectroscopic approaches recently overcame this obstacle. These experiments identified one of the four-iron Fe-S faces of the active-site FeMo-co as the specific site of reactivity, indicated that the side chain of residue alpha70V controls access to this face, and supported the involvement of the side chain of residue alpha195H in proton delivery. We can now freeze-quench trap N2 reduction pathway intermediates and use electron-nuclear double resonance (ENDOR) and electron spin-echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) spectroscopies to characterize them. However, even successful trapping of a N2 reduction intermediate occurs without synchronous electron delivery to the MoFe protein. As a result, the number of electrons and protons, n, delivered to MoFe during its formation is unknown. To determine n and the electron inventory, we initially employed ENDOR spectroscopy to analyze the substrate moiety bound to the FeMo-co and 57Fe within the cofactor. Difficulties in using that approach led us to devise a robust kinetic protocol for determining n of a trapped intermediate. This Account describes strategies that we have formulated to bring this "face" of the nitrogenase mechanism into view and afford approaches to its climb. Although the summit remains distant, we look forward to continued progress in the ascent.

The chemical mechanism for biological cleavage of the N(2) triple bond at ambient pressure and temperature has been the subject of intense study for many years. The site of substrate activation and reduction has been localized to a complex cofactor, called FeMo cofactor, yet until now the complexity of the system has denied information concerning exactly where and how substrates interact with the metal-sulfur framework of the active site. In this Account, we describe a combined genetic, biophysical, and biochemical approach that was used to provide direct and detailed information concerning where alternative alkyne substrates interact with FeMo cofactor during catalysis. The relevance and limitations of this work with respect to N(2) binding and reduction also are discussed.