Search

• Build single-vehicle crash severity prediction models with different tree-based and other non-parametric models. • Identified the intrinsic mechanism of how contributing factors determine single-vehicle crash severity. • Utilized Grid-Search method to obtain the best performances based on five crash severity sub-datasets. • Compared the performances of different non-parametric models with training, cross-validation and test datasets. Single-vehicle crashes are more fatality-concentrated and have posed increasing challenges in traffic safety, which is of great research necessity. Tremendous previous studies have conducted relevant analysis with econometric modeling approaches, whereas the ability of non-parametric methods to predict crash severity is still smattering of knowledge. Consequently, the main objective of this paper is to conduct single-vehicle crash severity prediction with different tree-based and non-parameter models. An alternate aim is to identify the intrinsic mechanism of how contributing factors determine single-vehicle crash severity. By virtue of Grid-Search method, this paper conducted fine-tuning of different models to obtain the best performances based on five crash severity sub-datasets. For model evaluation, the accuracy indicators were calculated in training, validation and test sets, respectively. Besides, feature importance extraction was undertaken based on the results of model comparison. The finding indicated that these models didn't exhibit a huge performance difference for crash severity prediction in the same severity level; however, the performances of the models did vary among different datasets, with an average training accuracy of 99.27 %, 96.4 %, 86.98 %, 86.84 %, 71.76 % in fatal injury, severe injury, visible injury, complaint of pain, PDO crash datasets, respectively. Additionally, it was found that in each severity dataset, the indicator urban freeways is a determinant factor that leads to the occurrence of crashes while rural freeways is more related to more severe crashes (i.e., fatal and severe crashes). This paper can provide valuable information for model selection and tuning in accident severity prediction. Future research could consider the influences that temporal instability of contributing features has on the model performances. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Factors affecting injury severity in rollover crashes were explored. • Random parameters logit model with unobserved heterogeneity in means and variances. • Findings reveal temporal instability of model specifications across individual years. • Aggregate-to-component shift quantified using out-of-sample prediction. • Implications for mitigating the associated driver injury severity. Single-vehicle rollover crashes have been acknowledged as a predominant highway crash type resulting in serious casualties. To investigate the heterogeneous impact of factors determining different injury severity levels in single-vehicle rollover crashes, the random parameters logit model with unobserved heterogeneity in means and variances was employed in this paper. A five-year dataset on single-vehicle rollover crashes, gathered in California from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2017, was utilized. Driver injury severities that were determined to be outcome variables include no injury, minor injury, and severe injury. Characteristics pertaining to the crash, driver, temporal, vehicle, roadway, and environment were acknowledged as potential determinants. The results showed that the gender indicator specified to minor injury was consistently identified as a significant random parameter in four years' models and the joint five-year model, excluding the 2016 crash model where the night indicator associated with no injury was observed to produce the random effect. Additionally, two series of likelihood ratio tests were conducted to assess the year-to-year and aggregate-to-component temporal stability of model estimation results. Marginal effects of explanatory variables were also calculated and compared to analyze the temporal stability and interpret the results. The findings revealed an overall temporal instability of model specifications across individual years, while there is no significant aggregate-to-component variation. Injury severities were observed to be stably affected by several variables, including improper turn indicator, under the influence of alcohol indicator, old driver indicator, seatbelt indicator, insurance indicator, and airbag indicator. Furthermore, the year-to-year and aggregate-to-component shift was quantified and characterized by calculating the differences in probabilities between within-sample observations and out-of-sample predictions. The overall results imply that continuing to expand and refine the model to incorporate more comprehensive datasets can result in more robust and stable injury severity prediction, thus benefiting in mitigating the associated driver injury severity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Investigated the influence mechanisms of toll way crashes involving distracted and non-distracted driving. • Random parameters logit models with heterogeneity in the means and variances are estimated. • Differences between distracted and non-distracted driving injury severities are compared. • Temporal shifts and non-transferability in parameter estimations are explored. Distracted driving is a prominent cause of traffic crashes and may increase the severity of collisions. Due to the larger speeds on toll ways, distracted driving crashes are more severe than on other types of roads, making it worthwhile to investigate. This study examined the variation in the influence of factors affecting injury severity in crashes involving distracted and non-distracted driving, as well as the change over time, using crash data from Florida toll ways from the 2017 to 2019. A series of random parameters logit models with heterogeneity in the means and variances were developed to analyze different driver-injury severities (no injury, minor injury, and severe injury) in crashes involving distracted and non-distracted driving. In addition, likelihood ratio tests were conducted to determine whether model parameters differed between different driver behaviors (distracted/non-distracted driving) and among years. Several factors potentially impacting injury severities were studied, including driver, crash, vehicle, roadway, environment, temporal, and others. Significant disparities were observed between the contributing factors of the severity of crashes involving distracted and non-distracted driving. Results showed that considerable differences were also observed in the severity of injuries caused by two types of crashes and distracted driving resulted in more serious crashes than non-distracted driving. Despite model results indicated that factors influencing injury severity altered over time, several factors, such as motorcycle involvement and commercial car involvement, still exhibited relative temporal stability in non-distracted driving crashes over the three years. Temporal instability and non-transferability were also captured by out-of-sample predictions to verify the temporal shifts of contributing variables from year to year. This study is useful for distinguishing the influence mechanisms between the two types of crashes involving distracted and non-distracted driving, and the results can be applied for safety countermeasures development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Three counting models are used to build violation performance functions, and NB-2 is better suited. • DUI violations present temporal instability varying months and day of the week. • Violations frequently occur on pleasing weather days with clear visibility, slight breeze, and good air quality. • The worst-case scenarios for DUI violations are sunny holidays and Friday with lower temperatures. • More speeding violations occur on sunny holidays with improved visibility. Traffic violations and crashes are inherently associated. Analysis of traffic violation frequency is a prerequisite for improvements in crash prevention and corresponding countermeasures. One of the essential works in the field of traffic violations relates to the exploration of the correlations between a certain violation type (e.g., speeding or safety belt use) and its causal factors (e.g., demographics and road types). Till now, the effects of spatiotemporal and meteorological factors on severe traffic violations, a general term for dangerous driving behaviors, have not been fully considered. Using the dataset consisting of daily severe traffic violations and meteorological conditions during 12 months in Jiangsu Province, China, violation performance functions were developed for three violation types (total violations, driving under the influence, and speeding) based on three models (Poisson regression, zero-inflated Poisson regression, and negative binomial model). The findings indicate that the negative binomial model has a better performance for traffic violation frequency estimation. Additionally, elastic analysis for three violation types relying on the negative binomial model was conducted to present the relationships between the explanatory variables and the expected violation frequency. The effects of spatiotemporal factors have revealed that the violation situations are significantly different in varying cities and the frequency of drunk driving shows a significant time instability. It is also found that rainy days will generate a decrease in the possibility of violation occurrence. With regard to temperature, a significant negative effect is found and the decrease in temperature will bring about an increase in violation frequency. Besides, traffic violation frequency is significantly increased during holidays with comfortable weather conditions. The conclusion of this study can provide insightful suggestions for the department of traffic enforcement to adjust the patrol plans according to the specified periods (weeks, months, or holidays) and weather conditions. Special rectification actions and targeted educational activities are also advised to be put forward simultaneously. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• The remarkable relationship between the kinetic data and the crash risk was proved. • Kinetic data is generated by the vehicle in real time while normal driving. • A new method for high crash risk identification based on kinetic parameters was proposed. • It can be effectively used to identify road design defects related to crash risk. • Investigated the feasibility of kinetic parameters as crash surrogate events. With the development and maturation of vehicle-based data acquisition technology, in-vehicle data is increasingly being used to explore road safety. This paper reports on research that analyzed the real-time tire force data (kinetic response) obtained from vehicle kinetic experiments, and constructed a new approach for identifying the high-risk of crashes on freeway segments with horizontal curvature. First, the road was divided into 1km units. Then, taking into account the characteristics of freeway alignment, each segment with horizontal curve was selected as the object of subsequent analysis. Automotive instrumentation was used to obtain a measure of tire force in the course of normal driving. The entire data set was preprocessed according to rate of change and the density of the data was reduced. By defining the outliers of the kinetic data and conducting factor analysis, two representative crash risk indicators of longitudinal and lateral stability were obtained. Negative binomial regression model (NBR model) and random effects negative binomial regression model (RENBR model) were constructed and jointly applied based on the new indicators to predict the risk value of horizontal curve segments. The method showed good prediction performance (71.8 %) for high-risk road segments with design flaws, but the predicted effect for low-risk road segments was not ideal. This study not only illustrated the effectiveness of in-vehicle data in assessing road crash risk by coupling multiple kinetic parameters, but also provided support for freeway safety research using surrogate measures of risk when there is a lack of crash statistics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]