Search

Rationale and Objectives To analyze the performances of diameter-based measurements, either using diameters, or by calculating diameter-based volumes, as compared to volume measurements in assessing growth of pulmonary adenocarcinomas manifesting as subsolid nodules on CT. Materials and Methods In this IRB-approved, retrospective study, 74 pulmonary adenocarcinomas presenting as subsolid nodules and resected in 69 patients (21 men, 48 women, mean age 70 ± 9 years) were included. Three CTs were available for each patient. Nodule size on each CT was assessed with diameter measurements, calculated volume based on diameter measurements, and measured volume. Nodule growth was defined as an increase of measured volume ≥25% between two sequential CTs. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of diameter-based measurements for growth assessment were calculated. Nodule characteristics were compared with nonparametric tests and analysis of variance. Results There were fewer growing nodules during CT1-CT2 interval (n = 22, 30%) than during CT2-CT3 interval (n = 33, 45%, p =.060). Specificity and negative predictive value of diameter-based measurements for growth assessment ranged respectively from 52 to 77% and 81 to 83% between CT1 and CT2, and from 66 to 76% and 79 to 90% between CT2 and CT3. Nongrowing nodules tended to be larger, regardless how size was measured, and some of these differences in size were statistically significant (p =.002 to .046). Conclusion For pulmonary adenocarcinomas presenting as subsolid nodules on CT, diameter-based assessment of nodule volume is reasonably accurate at confirming a lack of nodule growth but may overestimate actual growth, as compared to growth assessment based on measured volume.

Rationale and Objectives To analyze the pattern and longitudinal evolution of honorary authorship in major radiology journals. Materials and Methods In this Institutional Review Board-approved study, an electronic survey was sent to first authors of original research articles published in the American Journal of Roentgenology, European Radiology, the Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Radiology during 2 years (July 2014 through June 2016). Questions addressed the perception of honorary authorship and contributing factors, as well as demographic information. Univariate analysis was performed by using χ2 tests. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess independent factors associated with the perception of honorary authorship. Results Of 1839 first authors, 315 (17.3%) responded. Of these, 31.4% (97/309) perceived that at least one coauthor did not make sufficient contributions to merit authorship and 54.3% (159/293) stated that one or more coauthors performed only “nonauthor” tasks according to International Committee of Medical Journal Editors criteria. Of eight factors significantly associated with the perception of honorary authorship on univariate analysis, two were retained by the stepwise multivariate model: having someone suggest adding an author and a coauthor performing only a nonauthorship task. Conclusion There has been little variation in the perception of honorary authorship among first authors of original research articles in radiology. The suggestion of adding an author and having coauthors performing only nonauthorship tasks are the two most important risk factors for honorary authorship. Our findings indicate that a prolonged course of transformation of current cultural norms is required to decrease honorary authorship.

Rationale and Objectives The objective of this study was to quantify the impact of different rounding methods on size measurements of pulmonary nodules and to determine the number of nodules that change management categories as a result of rounding. Materials and Methods For this retrospective institutional review board-approved study, we included 503 incidental pulmonary nodules (308 solid and 195 subsolid) from a data repository. Long and short axes were measured. Average diameters were calculated using four different rounding methods (method 1: no rounding; method 2: rounding only the average diameter to the closest millimeter; method 3: rounding only short and long axes; and method 4: rounding short and long axes and the average diameter to the closest millimeter). Nodules were classified for each rounding method according to the 2017 Fleischner Society guideline management categories. Measurements were compared among the four rounding methods using analysis of variance. Results Without rounding, the average nodule diameter was 15.67 ± 5.97 mm. This increased between 0.03 and 0.29 mm using rounding methods 2–4 (range: P Conclusions Rounding methods have a small absolute but statically significant effect on nodule size, impacting management category in less than 3% of the nodules. This suggests that, in clinical practice, any rounding method can be used for determining nodule size without substantially biasing individual nodules toward given management categories.

Rationale and Objectives This study aims to assess the use of skeletal muscle mass measurements at two thoracic levels to diagnose sarcopenia on computed tomography (CT) chest examinations and to analyze the impact of these measurements on clinical outcome parameters following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Materials and Methods This study retrospectively included 157 patients who underwent preoperative CT examinations. The total muscle area was measured on transverse CT images at the 3rd lumbar and 7th and 12th thoracic levels with skeletal muscle indices (SMIs) calculated at each level. SMIs were then compared to clinical outcome parameters, and thoracic cutoff values for sarcopenia at the 7th and 12th thoracic levels were calculated. Results Correlation between SMIs at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) and the 12th thoracic vertebra (T12) was stronger (r = 0.724, P

Rationale and Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency and spectrum of abnormalities on routine screening chest radiographs among inpatients and outpatients with “positive purified protein derivative (PPD)” in a large tertiary care academic medical center in a country with low prevalence of tuberculosis (TB). Materials and Methods The reports of all chest radiographs of general inpatients and outpatients referred for positive PPD (2010–2014) were evaluated for the frequency of evidence of active or latent TB and the spectrum of imaging findings. The results of additional chest radiographs and computed tomography scans were recorded, as were additional relevant clinical histories and symptoms. Results Of the 2518 patients who underwent chest radiography for positive PPD, the radiographs were normal in 91.3%. The vast majority of the abnormal radiographs demonstrated findings consistent with old tuberculous disease. There were three cases (0.1%) of active TB, all of which were either recent immigrants from an endemic area or had other relevant histories or clinical symptoms suggestive of the disease. Conclusions Universal chest radiography in general inpatient and outpatient populations referred for positive PPD is of low yield for detecting active disease in a country with low prevalence of TB.

Rationale and Objectives This study aimed to compare long-axis diameter to average computed tomography (CT) diameter measurements of lung adenocarcinomas manifesting as solid lung nodules ≤30 mm on CT, as referenced to pathologic measurements, and to determine the impact of the two CT measurement approaches on tumor (T)-staging of nodules. Materials and Methods This institutional review board-approved study included all 274 radiologic solid adenocarcinomas resected at our institution over 10 years. Two observers measured long- and short-axis diameters on pre-resection chest CT in lung and mediastinal windows. T-stages were determined. CT measurements and T-stages were compared to pathology measurements and T-stages using Wilcoxon signed rank test and McNemar test. Inter- and intraobserver variability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. Results For lung and mediastinal windows, nodule size was significantly larger using long-axis diameter rather than average diameter (16.93 vs. 14.92 mm, P .001; and 14.02 vs. 12.17 mm, P .001, respectively). The correlation of CT with pathologic measurements was stronger with long-axis than with average diameter (ICC 0.808 vs. 0.730; and 0.731 vs. 0.621, respectively). Lung window measurements correlated stronger with pathology than mediastinal window measurements. CT T-stages differed from pathology T-stages in more than 20% of nodules ( P .001). Inter- and intraobserver variability was small with long-axis and average diameter (ICC range 0.96–0.991, and 0.970–0.993, respectively), but long-axis diameter showed wider scatter on Bland-Altman plots. Conclusions Long-axis CT diameter is preferable for T-staging because it better reflects the pathology T-stage. Average CT diameter might be used for longitudinal nodule follow-up because it shows less measurement variability and is more conservative in size assessment.

To analyze the pattern and longitudinal evolution of honorary authorship in major radiology journals.In this Institutional Review Board-approved study, an electronic survey was sent to first authors of original research articles published in the American Journal of Roentgenology, European Radiology, the Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Radiology during 2 years (July 2014 through June 2016). Questions addressed the perception of honorary authorship and contributing factors, as well as demographic information. Univariate analysis was performed by using χ2 tests. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess independent factors associated with the perception of honorary authorship.Of 1839 first authors, 315 (17.3%) responded. Of these, 31.4% (97/309) perceived that at least one coauthor did not make sufficient contributions to merit authorship and 54.3% (159/293) stated that one or more coauthors performed only "nonauthor" tasks according to International Committee of Medical Journal Editors criteria. Of eight factors significantly associated with the perception of honorary authorship on univariate analysis, two were retained by the stepwise multivariate model: having someone suggest adding an author and a coauthor performing only a nonauthorship task.There has been little variation in the perception of honorary authorship among first authors of original research articles in radiology. The suggestion of adding an author and having coauthors performing only nonauthorship tasks are the two most important risk factors for honorary authorship. Our findings indicate that a prolonged course of transformation of current cultural norms is required to decrease honorary authorship.

The objective of this study was to quantify the impact of different rounding methods on size measurements of pulmonary nodules and to determine the number of nodules that change management categories as a result of rounding.For this retrospective institutional review board-approved study, we included 503 incidental pulmonary nodules (308 solid and 195 subsolid) from a data repository. Long and short axes were measured. Average diameters were calculated using four different rounding methods (method 1: no rounding; method 2: rounding only the average diameter to the closest millimeter; method 3: rounding only short and long axes; and method 4: rounding short and long axes and the average diameter to the closest millimeter). Nodules were classified for each rounding method according to the 2017 Fleischner Society guideline management categories. Measurements were compared among the four rounding methods using analysis of variance.Without rounding, the average nodule diameter was 15.67 ± 5.97 mm. This increased between 0.03 and 0.29 mm using rounding methods 2-4 (range: P 0.001-0.017). The nodule size was more frequently rounded up (range: 52.1%-77.5%) than rounded down (range: 17.7%-42.5%) using rounding methods 2-4, as compared to no rounding. In the 308 solid nodules, up to 2.9% of the nodules changed management category, whereas none of the 195 subsolid nodules changed category.Rounding methods have a small absolute but statically significant effect on nodule size, impacting management category in less than 3% of the nodules. This suggests that, in clinical practice, any rounding method can be used for determining nodule size without substantially biasing individual nodules toward given management categories.

This study aimed to compare long-axis diameter to average computed tomography (CT) diameter measurements of lung adenocarcinomas manifesting as solid lung nodules ≤30 mm on CT, as referenced to pathologic measurements, and to determine the impact of the two CT measurement approaches on tumor (T)-staging of nodules.This institutional review board-approved study included all 274 radiologic solid adenocarcinomas resected at our institution over 10 years. Two observers measured long- and short-axis diameters on pre-resection chest CT in lung and mediastinal windows. T-stages were determined. CT measurements and T-stages were compared to pathology measurements and T-stages using Wilcoxon signed rank test and McNemar test. Inter- and intraobserver variability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots.For lung and mediastinal windows, nodule size was significantly larger using long-axis diameter rather than average diameter (16.93 vs. 14.92 mm, P .001; and 14.02 vs. 12.17 mm, P .001, respectively). The correlation of CT with pathologic measurements was stronger with long-axis than with average diameter (ICC 0.808 vs. 0.730; and 0.731 vs. 0.621, respectively). Lung window measurements correlated stronger with pathology than mediastinal window measurements. CT T-stages differed from pathology T-stages in more than 20% of nodules (P .001). Inter- and intraobserver variability was small with long-axis and average diameter (ICC range 0.96-0.991, and 0.970-0.993, respectively), but long-axis diameter showed wider scatter on Bland-Altman plots.Long-axis CT diameter is preferable for T-staging because it better reflects the pathology T-stage. Average CT diameter might be used for longitudinal nodule follow-up because it shows less measurement variability and is more conservative in size assessment.